Heresy vs. Unorthodoxy

[servantofmosthigh]

OK, here's a new discussion topic: what's the difference between "heresy" vs. "unorthodoxy?"

Mormonism used to be considered "heresy." But it seems that today, many Christians veer from that term and prefer to call it "unorthodox."

What do you think?

 

[Mushroom]

I'm just a layman, but they appear to be the same thing to me.

 

[Simply_Nikki]

I think heresy is a damnable error, while unorthodox is not necessarily so. Though something can be unorthodox and a heresy at the same time I'd imagine .

 

[Hippo]

For a start to be unorthodox is not to say that someone is in error, just that you are not in accordance with historicaly accepted church teaching. All new thoughts will go through at least a stage of being unorthodox before either becoming accepted (and hence orthodox), being rejected (and hence heresy) or just being tolerated.

Heresy is a judgment by the church that that a position is actively in opposition to the teaching of the church and unless the pronouncement is in error there can be no change in the status of that position.

 

[ModernPuritan?]

and from what it appears today, we have all but forgotten that pattern. It goes directly from unorthodox immediately into "well, its just their opinions, their understanding, their way" so much so that our "truth claims" that were once "absolute" are now "relative" and no longer truth.

 

[servantofmosthigh]

According to J.I. Packer and Mark Dever, in In My Place Condemned He Stood, they define Orthodoxy as, "right doctrinal belief, viewed as the church's confession of its faith and stated syllabus for teaching." They then define Unorthodoxy as any deviation from that standard.

They believe that the word heresy today "combines maximum fuzziness of meaning with maximum vituperative emotional heat" that cause this word to be "too hot to handle in any sober analysis," whereas unorthodoxy is "more exact and less explosive."

So it appears that Packer & Dever define these words the way Brad understands them: similar but one being more explosive emotionally and less sober cognitively than the other.

 

[Zenas]

Mormonism used to be considered "heresy." But it seems that today, many Christians veer from that term and prefer to call it "unorthodox."

What do you think?

I find what many Christians say today to be heretical.

Claiming that God is a glorified man from another planet is not unorthodox. Unorthodox merely means not orthodox for any of a number of reasons except being wrong or right. When a belief is determined to be wrong or right, then it moves into heresey or orthodoxy, respectively, and out of unorthodoxy.

 

[Mushroom]

Oops! I confused "unorthodoxy" with "heterodoxy". Can someone linguistically define the difference between the terms? And would heterodoxy be heresy?

 

[Poimen]

Mormonism is not heresy. Heresy is defined as something that strikes at the heart of Christian doctrine by a Christian group or person. Mormonism is another religion altogether.

 

[servantofmosthigh]

Mormonism is not heresy. Heresy is defined as something that strikes at the heart of Christian doctrine by a Christian group or person. Mormonism is another religion altogether.

Mormonism denies the diety of Christ. They believe that Christ is "a" Son of God, not "The" Son of God. That's heresy, alright... To reject the divinity of the 2nd Person is to reject the Trinity. And to reject the Trinity is heresy.

But is it too emotionally loaded to call it "heresy," and better to call it "unorthodoxy," as Packer and Dever think is better suited for today's culture?

 

[DMcFadden]

Heresy A belief or teaching that contradicts Scripture and Christian theology.

Heresy, Christological A view that deviates from the orthodox formulation regarding the person and work of Christ.

Heretical Pertaining to any view that has been officially condemned by an authoritative body.

Orthodoxy The body of doctrines taught by Scripture, such as the deity of Christ, the Trinity, and the authority of Scripture; also, the segment of Christianity holding these doctrines.

Unorthodox Pertaining to a departure from the official view. The term does not usually connote as serious a deviation as does “heterodox.”

Erickson, M. J. (2001). The concise dictionary of Christian theology (Rev. ed., 1st Crossway ed.) (211). Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books.

 

[Poimen]

Mormonism is not heresy. Heresy is defined as something that strikes at the heart of Christian doctrine by a Christian group or person. Mormonism is another religion altogether.

Mormonism denies the diety of Christ. They believe that Christ is "a" Son of God, not "The" Son of God. That's heresy, alright... To reject the divinity of the 2nd Person is to reject the Trinity. And to reject the Trinity is heresy.

So does Islam. Is Islam a heresy?

 

[servantofmosthigh]

Mormonism is not heresy. Heresy is defined as something that strikes at the heart of Christian doctrine by a Christian group or person. Mormonism is another religion altogether.

Mormonism denies the diety of Christ. They believe that Christ is "a" Son of God, not "The" Son of God. That's heresy, alright... To reject the divinity of the 2nd Person is to reject the Trinity. And to reject the Trinity is heresy.

So does Islam. Is Islam a heresy?

I'm not going to answer that because it's sooooo obvious...

 

[TimV]

So does Islam. Is Islam a heresy?

There are those who think of Islam as a Christian heresy. Christ born of a virgin, the second greatest prophet, etc..the difference between Mormonism and Islam in that respect isn't that different. The Alawi who run Syria have a trinity, have Christmas and Ascension Day as holidays even on the national level etc...They really like Christ, and have an exceedingly high regard for Him, especially compared to, say, Jews. But it still doesn't cut it.

 

[Poimen]

Mormonism denies the diety of Christ. They believe that Christ is "a" Son of God, not "The" Son of God. That's heresy, alright... To reject the divinity of the 2nd Person is to reject the Trinity. And to reject the Trinity is heresy.

So does Islam. Is Islam a heresy?

I'm not going to answer that because it's sooooo obvious...

There is no need to bait people on the board. If you don't want to answer the question just say so.

Heresy is division; it is schism on doctrinal points. The Mormon church as of its founding was never part of the Christian faith though some of its followers may have left the church.

 

[bookslover]

Are you talking, maybe, in the OP, about the difference between orthodoxy and heterodoxy?

 

[beej6]

The fact that no one likes to use the term "heresy" doesn't make it less valid, nor should "unorthodox," a weaker word, be used to substitute for it.

Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons who represent themselves as Christian yet fail the Trinitarian test are thus heretics.

I'd probably say that semi-Pelagians are unorthodox, but as a confessional Presbyterian, how else could I characterize them?

 

[servantofmosthigh]

So does Islam. Is Islam a heresy?

I'm not going to answer that because it's sooooo obvious...

There is no need to bait people on the board. If you don't want to answer the question just say so.

I thought I did say so... OK, if I didn't, here it is: I'm not going to answer that...

Reason why I'm not going to answer that? Because it's soooooo obvious.

 

[Pergamum]

I am with Poimen here. Other religions are not heresy, but other religions. Heresy is from within the church..i.e. a traitor in the ranks, not a foreign invading army.

Also, I would stress that to call someone a heretic is to call him damned and not a child of God. Therefore it should be reserved only for those that deny the Trinity of the orthodox views of Christ. Other errors may be gross errors, but we only do disservice to erring brothers (like Dispensationalists and most Arminians) if we call them heretics.

 

[py3ak]

I'm not going to answer that because it's sooooo obvious...

There is no need to bait people on the board. If you don't want to answer the question just say so.

I thought I did say so... OK, if I didn't, here it is: I'm not going to answer that...

Reason why I'm not going to answer that? Because it's soooooo obvious.

Pastor Shin, please be careful with the snarkiness. I understand its entertainment value, but it is a form of entertainment rather out of place in conversation among Christian brethren.

Now, back to the regularly scheduled programming.

 

[Ron Henzel]

While I don't necessarily subscribe to it, some time ago I posted one definition of heresy here.

 

[DMcFadden]

While I don't necessarily subscribe to it, some time ago I posted one definition of heresy here.

Ron, if memory serves me, that is EXACTLY the definition of heresy that famed scholar Jaroslav Pelikan used in his 1992 – 1993 Gifford lectures at the University of Aberdeen and in his magnum opus, the five volume The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine (1971-1989). You are to be commended for your use of scholarly tools. Dr. Foxworthy certainly captures the sense. Thanks for contributing it to this thread.

 

[servantofmosthigh]

There is no need to bait people on the board. If you don't want to answer the question just say so.

I thought I did say so... OK, if I didn't, here it is: I'm not going to answer that...

Reason why I'm not going to answer that? Because it's soooooo obvious.

Pastor Shin, please be careful with the snarkiness. I understand its entertainment value, but it is a form of entertainment rather out of place in conversation among Christian brethren.

Now, back to the regularly scheduled programming.

Py3ak, be at peace. There was no snarkiness (whatever that means) on my part.

But this dialogue between myself and Poiman, and with Py3ak assuming some kind of snarkiness was communicated by me that wasn't there perfectly illustrates Packer's and Dever's point that the term "heresy" too easily maximizes emotions and confusion whereas "unorthodoxy" doesn't.

Py3ak, you fell for it. I set the question and situation up. Poiman clued it in earlier with the "bait" being set. You took the bait...

If you don't get it, brother, PM me and I'll explain.

 

[Contra Marcion]

Mormonism is not heresy. Heresy is defined as something that strikes at the heart of Christian doctrine by a Christian group or person. Mormonism is another religion altogether.

Exactly! However, one thought - Mormonism, in the days of Joseph Smith, was indeed a heresy, as he was getting more and more "out there" in his crazy ideas, and splitting off from the Christian faith. As an apostate Christian (objectively, anyway), Joseph Smith was a heretic. Subsequent generations of Mormons, having never been part of the visible Church, are simply practitioners of an different religion altogether, and damned unless they repent and believe the gospel.

 

[Simply_Nikki]

I am with Poimen here. Other religions are not heresy, but other religions. Heresy is from within the church..i.e. a traitor in the ranks, not a foreign invading army.

Also, I would stress that to call someone a heretic is to call him damned and not a child of God. Therefore it should be reserved only for those that deny the Trinity of the orthodox views of Christ. Other errors may be gross errors, but we only do disservice to erring brothers (like Dispensationalists and most Arminians) if we call them heretics.

I agree. Heresy or Heretics are those so far outside the realms of the essential orthodox Christian faith, that they can no longer be considered "Christian".

I've had to be more careful with the terms myself as some like to call Arminians or charismatics, or some other disagreeable detail of Christianity's fine points, "heretics". I concur, heretic should be reserved for those with damnable offenses, like gnosticism = heresy, open theism = heresy, oneness pentecostalism = heresy.

 

[py3ak]

I thought I did say so... OK, if I didn't, here it is: I'm not going to answer that...

Reason why I'm not going to answer that? Because it's soooooo obvious.

Pastor Shin, please be careful with the snarkiness. I understand its entertainment value, but it is a form of entertainment rather out of place in conversation among Christian brethren.

Now, back to the regularly scheduled programming.

Py3ak, be at peace. There was no snarkiness (whatever that means) on my part.

But this dialogue between myself and Poiman, and with Py3ak assuming some kind of snarkiness was communicated by me that wasn't there perfectly illustrates Packer's and Dever's point that the term "heresy" too easily maximizes emotions and confusion whereas "unorthodoxy" doesn't.

Py3ak, you fell for it. I set the question and situation up. Poiman clued it in earlier with the "bait" being set. You took the bait...

If you don't get it, brother, PM me and I'll explain.

So are you saying you pretended to be aggressive and disrespectful in order to illustrate that emotionally charged words do not facilitate communication?

 

[servantofmosthigh]