VirginiaHuguenot
Puritanboard Librarian
Originally posted by joshua
I just to have to ask, "What's up with the huose spelling?"
[Edited on 1-18-2005 by joshua]
Did this question ever get answered??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by joshua
I just to have to ask, "What's up with the huose spelling?"
[Edited on 1-18-2005 by joshua]
Originally posted by VirginiaHuguenot
Originally posted by joshua
I just to have to ask, "What's up with the huose spelling?"
[Edited on 1-18-2005 by joshua]
Did this question ever get answered??
Again I will ask this, when is the last time you or anyone else said anythign during worship? Have you ever asked the pastor to clarify his position? Have you ever asked the pastor where he reached that conclusion? Or do you just stare at the necks of the people in front of you?
Did this question ever get answered??
The house church movement is illicit; hence the intentional erred spelling. "Huose Chruches"
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Your premise is dangerous. It opens up the door to accept the charismatics and their silly notions as possibly a new move of God.
Originally posted by Charismatic Calvinist
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Your premise is dangerous. It opens up the door to accept the charismatics and their silly notions as possibly a new move of God.
In all fairness, your premise is stale, turns a blind eye to Church history, and stinks of Rome.
Originally posted by Charismatic Calvinist
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Your premise is dangerous. It opens up the door to accept the charismatics and their silly notions as possibly a new move of God.
In all fairness, your premise is stale, turns a blind eye to Church history, and stinks of Rome.
Originally posted by fredtgreco
And your view is dangerous, contrary to the principle of Sola Scriptura, and makes God have a Plan B. If God plans something other than the Church, what are we to make of Paul's statements about the eternal nature of the Church, and John's descriptions in Revelation.
Why cannot a body of believers gather togather, worship, pray, teach, exhort each others gifts, and commune on the meal remembering our Lord?
Originally posted by lionovjudah
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Chuck,
The new testament is not silent. It is very clear on what God requires of His people and His church. Our creeds clearly define what the bible has to say about these issues. Question: I would assume you embrace either the WCF or LBC?
Creeds and Confessions do not exhaust the Godhead Scott. Their necessity is limited in that sense. But Chuck is correct, the NT, which certainly does not prescribe the forulation of creeds, presents a picture of a community of believers. Giving the glory to God. being instructed and instructing each other. I doubt it was a starched, stagnent gropu of people with no life for an hour a week. The lived their faith, they were persecuted. they shared what they had with each other. I believe this can be done within the confines of current day Christendumb. We need to get away from the 15 sermon and one man show..... Let us become a priesthood of all believers edifying the body as a whole!!!!!!!
Joe
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Chuck,
The new testament is not silent. It is very clear on what God requires of His people and His church. Our creeds clearly define what the bible has to say about these issues. Question: I would assume you embrace either the WCF or LBC?
Originally posted by Charismatic Calvinist
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Chuck,
The new testament is not silent. It is very clear on what God requires of His people and His church. Our creeds clearly define what the bible has to say about these issues. Question: I would assume you embrace either the WCF or LBC?
They are wonderful. I keep a copy of the WCF in my briefcase and study it in my spare time. But as Joe stated, they don't exhaust the Godhead.
Originally posted by lionovjudah
Originally posted by Charismatic Calvinist
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Chuck,
The new testament is not silent. It is very clear on what God requires of His people and His church. Our creeds clearly define what the bible has to say about these issues. Question: I would assume you embrace either the WCF or LBC?
They are wonderful. I keep a copy of the WCF in my briefcase and study it in my spare time. But as Joe stated, they don't exhaust the Godhead.
Chuck, the irony is that to use an organization that is promoting this spectator worship, to justify their polity as mirroring the early church makes absolutlely no sense.
The fact remains, church polity as practiced by many today is absent from the Holy Writ...
Joe
Originally posted by LadyFlynt
Okay, I'm gonna throw a the can out there for you all to break open...
In the synagogues it is my understanding that the men, after the reading of the Torah and the man (whoever's turn it was) gave his explanation, then the other men (in orderly fashion) could/would question him, adding in things to think on...This caused the congregation to think, to make sure that the one reading understood and was explaning correctly, to make any corrections neccessary, and to bring those whose thinking was wrong back to a unified position.
Go at it, boys!
Not a big point, as I said just doing a drive-by posting
Originally posted by lionovjudah
Chuck, the irony is that to use an organization that is promoting this spectator worship, to justify their polity as mirroring the early church makes absolutlely no sense.