I might become premillennial

Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps that could be so, although I think the force of what I was saying is still valid. Anyway, my argument doesn't hinge on that. Btw, I found a reformed theologian who denied that we live in the new creation because it was "earthy." I might email you the information since I don't want to go public with it.
 
Perhaps that could be so, although I think the force of what I was saying is still valid. Anyway, my argument doesn't hinge on that. Btw, I found a reformed theologian who denied that we live in the new creation because it was "earthy." I might email you the information since I don't want to go public with it.

"A" reformed theologian? Come on. I'd be glad to have the reference but it will take more than that to pin Amils down in a "playing harps on the clouds" view. They simply don't believe that. They believe the historic time/space resolution to sin and death is the Second Coming when all things are made new (not just some things made new for a thousand years then the rest later). :2cents:
 
"A" reformed theologian? Come on. I'd be glad to have the reference but it will take more than that to pin Amils down in a "playing harps on the clouds" view. They simply don't believe that. They believe the historic time/space resolution to sin and death is the Second Coming when all things are made new (not just some things made new for a thousand years then the rest later). :2cents:

Well, you had asked a while back "who" believed that. Strictly speaking, "a" answers that. :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top