This was on the topic of being impossible from personableness to come from impersonal
Yes, I agree with Schaeffer on that. He had a lot of influence on the moral argument that I use in Apologetics to the Glory of God. Basically: without an absolute-personal God, there can be no morality. Without morality, there can be no thought. With no thought there can be no assertions about causality, etc. On your specific question: personality cannot be reduced to impersonal forces (Schaeffer: matter, motion, time and chance), because personality presupposes morality (above).
what does he mean that if there is no morality, there can be no thought and if no thought then no causation? What does morality have to do with these, is he speaking of morality in a different term?
Thanks
also feel free to give me your thoughts!!!!!
Yes, I agree with Schaeffer on that. He had a lot of influence on the moral argument that I use in Apologetics to the Glory of God. Basically: without an absolute-personal God, there can be no morality. Without morality, there can be no thought. With no thought there can be no assertions about causality, etc. On your specific question: personality cannot be reduced to impersonal forces (Schaeffer: matter, motion, time and chance), because personality presupposes morality (above).
what does he mean that if there is no morality, there can be no thought and if no thought then no causation? What does morality have to do with these, is he speaking of morality in a different term?
Thanks
also feel free to give me your thoughts!!!!!