Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Paul manata
ammunition
Originally posted by Paul manata
Originally posted by Civbert
Try Gordon Clark's Karl Barth's Theological Method.
Have you read this Civbert?
Originally posted by Paul manata
Originally posted by WrittenFromUtopia
Originally posted by Paul manata
ammunition
That's weird. All the Van-Tillians I know (other than you, who are incidentally FV) love Barth..
That's weird. None of the Van Tillians I know are FV and all of them hate Barth.
VT critiques Barth, Bahnsen, Frame, Horton, R. Scott Clark, Poythress, Oliphant, Welty, Anderson, et al are not Barthians and don't care for him either.
Anyway, I guess you saying it's weird is an autobiograqphical remark. That is, it tells me how much you *don't* know about "Van Tillians" or contemporary Van Tillianism.
It may be that manyFV guys are Van Tillian, but they're a minority.
Originally posted by Paul manata
ah! The ole tounge-in-cheek gets me again!
Originally posted by weinhold
... Another thing that must be taken into consideration when talking about Barth is that he wrote an immense amount of material. His Church Dogmatics takes up a bookshelf, and he wrote many other articles and volumes. Any attempt to evaluate the whole of Barth's theology is thus extremely complex. One must take into account the development of Barth's thought over the course of his entire life, and thus evaluate his many nuances with care and charity. Unfortunately, this means that simplistic judgments about Barth will always be inadequate. In an effort to remedy this all too common symptom, I would recommend picking up T&T Clark's one volume abridged version of Church Dogmatics, as well as Dogmatics in Outline.