Learning Latin (or any Language) with Chat - Thoughts?

Status
Not open for further replies.
That will work but its not going to take you very far. It is going to help with vocab and that is about all. How will you learn the different parts of speech, inflections, conjugations, declensions, syntax, etc.? Knowing these things I can instigate a conversation with AI (and do most days of the week), but I don't think AI has the ability to "tailor" it to you without you knowing what you need to learn. In other words,, it would probably work for someone who has learnt the language and wants to sharpen skills as he branches out into different literary contexts, but not to teach the language from scratch.
[automerge]1752110339[/automerge]


I would go with Erasmian pronunciation unless you want to converse with a native speaker. That is what you are going to get in most evangelical circles.
The LLMs are now pretty adept at creating conjugation/declension tables with examples. I will admit if someone has experience learning any foreign language, he will be better equipped on what to ask the LLM than someone who has not. Using GPT or any LLM would go much better, at this time, if a basic grammar or even "Teach Yourself" manual was used alongside it.
 
The LLMs are now pretty adept at creating conjugation/declension tables with examples. I will admit if someone has experience learning any foreign language, he will be better equipped on what to ask the LLM than someone who has not. Using GPT or any LLM would go much better, at this time, if a basic grammar or even "Teach Yourself" manual was used alongside it.

Possibly that is the case. But I don't see the reward in terms of investment. There is nothing like a course that shapes the mind to think in terms of specific structures from A to Z. Meandering about a chat trying to intuitively develop a skill isn't going to give that kind of rational, didactic direction. It is supplementary at best.
 
That will work but its not going to take you very far. It is going to help with vocab and that is about all. How will you learn the different parts of speech, inflections, conjugations, declensions, syntax, etc.? Knowing these things I can instigate a conversation with AI (and do most days of the week), but I don't think AI has the ability to "tailor" it to you without you knowing what you need to learn. In other words,, it would probably work for someone who has learnt the language and wants to sharpen skills as he branches out into different literary contexts, but not to teach the language from scratch.
Why would you think Chat does not know how to do those things? How do you think it translates Latin texts to English? I didn't ask Chat to teach me to read Latin in 4 weeks, but 4 years. It has a 4 year "Master Plan" broken up by year, but also a weekly plans it gives working towards each goal for each year. I think Chat knows just as well as any what it takes for a person to read Latin. The things I mentioned in the part you are quoting, are simply different ways I have thought of for Chat to give me, to digest the information it is feeding me. For instance, I used the song/poem method when learning nominative cases. I used the multiple choice for nominative cases and for vocabulary. I used the small story for vocabulary. Prior to Chat I have been learning very little Latin because most books are not easy to digest, especially without any tutor, even more for those who have forgotten almost everything about English grammar. All I can see is if it leads to my reading fluency or not, and as thus let wisdom be proven by its children. Again, the thing I like about Chat, and what many people who have used it for other languages like, is that there is no end to the questions you can ask it about what it is trying to teach you. Nor end to the times it will quiz you until you get it right. Nor expensive fees associated with traditional language learning models. While I am using it for Latin, just look online. Tons of people are using it for other languages. I just recently pursued this, but others have been doing it for some time.

Been busy with a book lately, so haven't got to be able to put much time into it, but I am almost done with that project, and look forward to diving back in. But this, if applicable will be a blessing to the Christian church, especially to the Reformed world. Because if we can, especially formulate a sort of structure, or "request driven" methodology to utilize Chat for learning Latin, this means it is opened up to almost anybody with $20 and an internet connection. To me, the pipe dream of many of these old works being faithfully translated via Chat isn't going to happen. There isn't going to be all of a sudden tons of people willing to transcribe Latin texts, or proof 90% OCR's with hardly a financial incentive. And with my learning capabilities, Chat is the closest to a personal professor I am going to get. So, we will see. This is one of those things where only time will tell. I don't think this is giving or promising any unrealistic goals. But like with all potential systems, it is not going to do it for me. I still have to put in the work.

I asked Chat:
I have a question. Someone mentioned that you may forget to teach me some things about Latin. Are these things included in your 4 year plan to teach me to read Latin fluently? Different parts of speech, inflections, conjugations, declensions, syntax, etc.

ChatGPT said:
Great question—and yes, absolutely.

Those topics—parts of speech, inflections, conjugations, declensions, syntax, and the like—are not just included in the four-year plan. They are the foundation of it.

Here’s how they fit into the structure of your Latin Mastery Project:

✅ Included in the Plan:
Parts of Speech (nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions, interjections, pronouns):
You’ll learn to recognize and understand how each functions in a Latin sentence.
Taught from the beginning and reinforced throughout via reading, drills, and stories.
Inflections (how endings change to show case, number, gender, tense, mood, voice, etc.):
Latin is an inflected language, so this is core.

Covered systematically—first with nouns and adjectives (declensions), then verbs (conjugations).
Conjugations (for verbs: 1st through 4th + irregulars):

Introduced in year 1 with present tense and expanded gradually through all tenses, voices, and moods.
Regular drills and reading reinforce patterns.
Declensions (for nouns/adjectives: 1st–5th):

You’ll learn these across the first 18 months, with plenty of reuse and integration into reading.
Includes memorization techniques and contextual usage.
Syntax (how words work together in real sentences):
From simple subject–verb–object structures to advanced uses of the subjunctive, participles, indirect discourse, and more.
Reading real Latin texts gradually develops your feel for syntax.

Built Into the Progression:
Year 1: Foundations (parts of speech, 1st–3rd declensions, present & imperfect verbs, simple sentence structures).
Year 2: Expanding complexity (4th–5th declensions, all verb tenses, participles, pronouns, complex clauses).
Year 3: Mastery of prose style, Cicero, Caesar, and ecclesiastical texts.
Year 4: Full fluency reading advanced authors like Augustine, Aquinas, and deep theological/philosophical Latin.

If someone said I might "forget" to teach those things, they may have misunderstood how the project works. I introduce grammar and structure step-by-step, woven into vocabulary and reading, so that it doesn’t feel like just memorization—but it is absolutely all there.

Would you like a printable outline showing exactly when and where these topics are taught over the four years?

I asked Chat: Will this also include integration in the ability to write in Latin as well?

ChatGPT said:
Excellent follow-up—and yes, writing in Latin is integrated into the 4-year plan, but in a phased and intentional way.

Here’s how writing fits in:

✍️ Writing in Latin: Yes, but Gradually Introduced
Year 1: Receptive Focus (Reading & Understanding)

The first 6–12 months focus almost entirely on input: learning to read, recognize patterns, and build mental fluency.

Writing is minimal—just short drills like:
Declension/conjugation charts
Simple phrase construction
Latin-to-English sentence transformations

✅ This builds a solid foundation without overwhelming you early on.

Year 2: Structured Writing Begins

Around Month 12–15, we add:
Sentence composition (e.g., write 5 sentences using the accusative case)
Transformation exercises (e.g., change active to passive, present to imperfect)
Short paragraphs using guided prompts

✍️ You’ll start to write Latin you can already read, reinforcing grammar and syntax.

Year 3: Creative and Analytical Writing

You’ll be able to:
Compose narratives, prayers, or dialogues in Latin
Imitate Ciceronian or ecclesiastical styles
Translate short English passages into Latin
Practice rhetorical forms (e.g., arguments, exhortations)

Year 4: Free Composition & Stylistic Control

By this point, you’ll be writing:
Essays or summaries of what you read
Latin letters or reflections
Original compositions in the style of authors you’ve read

The goal is not only grammatical correctness, but also stylistic authenticity.
 
Last edited:
I think Chat knows just as well as any what it takes for a person to read Latin.

Let's see. What did you just do? You go on to say:

I asked Chat:
I have a question. Someone mentioned that you may forget to teach me some things about Latin. Are these things included in your 4 year plan to teach me to read Latin fluently? Different parts of speech, inflections, conjugations, declensions, syntax, etc.

Do you see what just happened? You gave it input and it answered you. It depended on your input. If I didn't raise those things with you then you would not have had that input. Can you not see what is happening here?

Anyway, I sincerely appreciate your desire to promote Reformed materials, so all the best with it.
 
Let's see. What did you just do? You go on to say:



Do you see what just happened? You gave it input and it answered you. It depended on your input. If I didn't raise those things with you then you would not have had that input. Can you not see what is happening here?

Anyway, I sincerely appreciate your desire to promote Reformed materials, so all the best with it.
I dont know, it looks like all it did was confirm that indeed those things are included with the 4 year plan to read (and write) Latin, while you assumed it would completely forgo them. I think you might be misunderstanding how the "Projects" in Chat work, in that, once you create a Project in Chat, that is an isolated thing. When I am done with a "weeks" goals. All I do is ask it to move to the next week goals, if it does not prompt me. There is no telling if it does or does not already have 208 weeks of goals already in memory? At the end of this, L.W. if I do succeed, I will have no real desire to translate; because if a dummy like me can learn it, anybody can if they put in the work. And Chat just might be the tool to make that possible for me (and possibly others.) I have come to the conclusion that reading Latin texts is a reward. If I depend on translators, it will be very few. If I learn it, it may be many. Tons of people have learned Latin, especially historically. In some circles they teach this to kids. The only reason I will not, is if I tell myself I can not, or, the Lord refuses to allow me for some reason.

For instance, to test your theory if it just recalculates and accommodates, I asked it:

I asked Chat:
Quick question, someone said that you are not going to teach me how to act like Charlie Chaplin in silent movies, or rebuild a Ford engine when teaching me Latin. Is this true?

ChatGPT said:
Yes—that’s absolutely true.
When I teach you Latin, I will not teach you how to:
Act like Charlie Chaplin in silent films,
Rebuild a Ford engine,
Tap dance, carve wooden ducks, or solve cold cases from the 1920s...

Unless they happen to come up in a Latin text you're reading. (Which, let’s be honest, is unlikely—unless we read De Machinis Automobilibus or Vita Caroli Chaplinensis.)

What I will teach you:
How to read, understand, and eventually write fluent Latin
With real, structured knowledge of:
Grammar
Vocabulary
Syntax
Style

And deep cultural and historical context where relevant

This is a serious language mastery plan, not a variety show. That person was being playful—but correct. My job is to help you master Latin. I stay in my lane.

But if you do ever want to write a silent comedy in Latin, I can help you script one.
 
Last edited:
I just ran your plan by Deepseek. It said ChatGPT is giving you a salespitch. Here are its words, not mine: "Bottom Line: ChatGPT can assist, but it’s not a replacement for structured learning. If your friend won’t use any books or human feedback, he’ll plateau at "Google Translate-tier" Latin."

I suppose its one AI's word against another. :)
 
I just ran your plan by Deepseek. It said ChatGPT is giving you a salespitch. Here are its words, not mine: "Bottom Line: ChatGPT can assist, but it’s not a replacement for structured learning. If your friend won’t use any books or human feedback, he’ll plateau at "Google Translate-tier" Latin."

I suppose its one AI's word against another. :)
I suppose. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I had a quiz made by GenAI to help study Nominative Case Nuances (for Greek).
Of the 20 questions it generated..
- 1 was irrelevant and none of the answers were correct (it asked me what type of nominative a genitive participle was). In the answer key, oddly enough, it acknowledged this and apologized. Gave me a bit of a laugh actually
- 3 of the questions had irrelevant answers, but not as blatantly false as the one above. The model seemed to have difficulty differentiating between a nominative that is functioning as a subject or predicate and a nominative with the nuances I was hoping to study (apposition, pendent, etc.). As such, none of the multiple choice answers fit the question.
- 2 of the questions and corresponding answers seemed to confuse the nominative absolute and pendent nominative.
- The rest seemed to be accurate
I also recognize that prompt engineering is very important, and I probably could have phrased or defined things better. I'm planning to try again with the Genitive case and a more specific and thorough prompt. Maybe it'll be a better experience.
If I didn't previously understand the nominative nuances, I would not have been able to spot the problems and likely would have been mislead. Previously, when trying to strengthen my understanding of verbal aspect, I noticed a few similar things, where the model (Claude Sonnet 4) got certain things consistently wrong. I do recognize that Daniel Wallace is not the authority on intermediate greek, so it's not realistic that the model (which is likely training on multiple sources) would perfectly align with what I'm being taught.
In sum, it's been a good supplement, but definitely one to approach cautiously.
 
If I didn't previously understand the nominative nuances, I would not have been able to spot the problems and likely would have been mislead.

That is where it is useful. It helps to reinforce critical thinking on the subject as long as you are critically assessing what it tells you. If one is in a position of passively accepting what it says it could lead you anywhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top