chbrooking
Puritan Board Junior
Is perichoresis a doctrine with proof-text style support, or is it derived by good and necessary consequence from other doctrines in theology proper?
Would someone be so kind as to lay out either the textual basis or the logical development of the doctrine?
I understand what it means, and at least some implications of the doctrine. I'm simply trying to discover the foundations of the doctrine.
Can you help me out?
---------- Post added at 10:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:40 PM ----------
Oops, should have done a search first. Found a previous thread:
http://www.puritanboard.com/f87/perichoresis-24064/
---------- Post added at 10:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:49 PM ----------
Anyone interested might look into Lane Tipton's The function of perichoresis and the divine incomprehensibility WTJ 64 no 2 Fall 2002, p 289-306.
---------- Post added at 11:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:52 PM ----------
As good as the previous post on the topic is, I'd love a more thorough treatment of how the doctrine is arrived at. The texts offered are relevant, but hardly conclusive without a little 'fleshing out'. Care to flesh them out for me, offer more, or lay out a logical case?
Thanks
Would someone be so kind as to lay out either the textual basis or the logical development of the doctrine?
I understand what it means, and at least some implications of the doctrine. I'm simply trying to discover the foundations of the doctrine.
Can you help me out?
---------- Post added at 10:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:40 PM ----------
Oops, should have done a search first. Found a previous thread:
http://www.puritanboard.com/f87/perichoresis-24064/
---------- Post added at 10:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:49 PM ----------
Anyone interested might look into Lane Tipton's The function of perichoresis and the divine incomprehensibility WTJ 64 no 2 Fall 2002, p 289-306.
---------- Post added at 11:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:52 PM ----------
As good as the previous post on the topic is, I'd love a more thorough treatment of how the doctrine is arrived at. The texts offered are relevant, but hardly conclusive without a little 'fleshing out'. Care to flesh them out for me, offer more, or lay out a logical case?
Thanks