He's a sharp Jesuit. He can say two things at the same time and consistently mean both. On one hand he can court secular favor with these quotes, but on the other, the traditionalist Catholic (the "Rad Trad") can correctly say, "Well, he isn't speaking ex cathedra, so it doesn't officially violate papal infalliblity."
On a more practical level, what does he mean by "judge?" Does "gay" mean you struggle with warped lustful thoughts, or does it mean sodomizing other men? There is so much ambiguity here, which is why a sharp Jesuit can deftly exploit the situation. I think Protestants have woefully underestimated the Jesuits for the last 100 years.