V for Vendetta

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plimoth Thom

Puritan Board Freshman
Coming November 5th, Guy Fawkes Day (Pope's Day in the U.S.) is the Wachowski Brothers' (The Matrix) new film V for Vendetta. Interestingly it will be released on the 400th anniversary of the Gunpowder Plot, and stars a masked character which looks like Guy Fawkes. One of the catch phrases for the film is:

"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."

Set against the futuristic landscape of totalitarian Britain, V For Vendetta tells the story of a mild-mannered young woman named Evey (Natalie Portman) who is rescued from a life-and-death situation by a masked vigilante known only as "œV." Incomparably charismatic and ferociously skilled in the art of combat and deception, V ignites a revolution when he detonates two London landmarks and takes over the government-controlled airwaves, urging his fellow citizens to rise up against tyranny and oppression. As Evey uncovers the truth about V´s mysterious background, she also discovers the truth about herself "“ and emerges as his unlikely ally in the culmination of his plot to bring freedom and justice back to a society fraught with cruelty and corruption.
 
I agree, a very interesting connection. I just think it's unfortunate they've turned the memory of a papist terrorist into a hero. Oh well, at least some people might learn a little bit about a very interesting period of history with the Guy Fawkes connection.

How 'bout a PB Pope's Day celebration next month.:pilgrim:

"Remember, remember, the 5th of November...."
 
I did some research on this movie because I liked the tag line about governments being afraid of their people. It turns out that it was a comic originally published as a protest against the horribly repressive Thatcher government! It features a lesbian heroine who inspires the female lead to rise up due to her oppression. The conservative government must be fascist and must be destroyed as it is secretly "a culture of corruption". So this will, disappointingly, most likely be another liberal paen to the evils of conservativism.
 
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Jeff,
Did it have special effects like the Matrix?

Not really (outside your usual blow 'em up/beet 'em up scenes). It didn't have any of the "slow motion" fighting where people move in hyper-mode like the matrix and other movies. I have to say, I thought the cinematography was well done though.

I think the trailer does the movie justice as far as the special effects you would see, but I do think the story line was better than the trailer depicted. And that is really just my :2cents:.
 
I honestly would avoid it like the plague. Maybe I was just having a sensitive evening, or whatever, but honestly it was the only movie that I have ever walked out of for "moral" or "worldview" reasons.

And I'm by no means conservative in that area. Well, conservative like this board is. I mean, I loved Pulp Fiction. I've seen it thirteen times or more, and I think the dialogue is brilliant. I never participate in movie discussions because I don't want to "break rank" and hear how I'm more unregenerate than an Armianian.

But aside from that... I don't know. It was just an exaltation of everything that burdens my mind. The glorification of homosexuality, how the government is eradicating homosexuality and Islam and anyone who disagrees with any of them. Christianity is the only thing that gets a bad rap in the movie; it doesn't once portray it in a positive light. The "motto" of the government is something like "Peace through Unity, Unity through Faith" and I believe there's a cross @ the bottom of the logo.

It was anti-government (in general, it seems; I personally think anarchy is ludicrous, and is usually espoused by weak people who could never survive if the physicall strong and poor were allowed to treat the little poor suburbans any way they wanted...), anti-Christianity, anti-morality...

I thought so. Maybe I'm just weird, or took too much acid back in the day. But I felt mentally raped, like I was receiving an enema courtesy of Hollywood. And it honestly may have been enough to convince me that I might just not go see movies anymore, outside of LOTR, Braveheart, or Narnia "type" movies.

Just my two cents.
 
The homosexual "freedom" was troubling to me as well. Some of the other views regarding government etc. were not biblical either (suprise, suprise).

I found it entertaining, but don't expect it to promote biblical ideas.
 
Yeah. The whole movie is dark, not very much color, showing how bad the world is. Maybe the *only* "lighted" scene in the movie that I can think of that shows nature and everything mentions the beautiful love of two beautiful women, and you get to see a full-on lesbian kiss. You also see two young girls come out to their rather conservative looking white dad only to have him berate them and make his wife cry and throw his daughter's baby picture in the trash.
 
Originally posted by joshua
Jeff's an Arminian. :pray2:

Wow...thanks for the heads up Josh! :handshake:

I guess, at least according to the quote on my signature, I am worse than a pelagian! :banghead:
 
Well I'm named Joshua too. I still think its a valid question. I mean no one cares cuz its not a part of "tradition", but I think its worthy of more consideration than its given. But hey, most of this board probably thinks I'm lame anyway. And sometimes its reciprocal.

:lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top