Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
4-5. Churches without teaching elders ought not to forsake the assembling of themselves together, but should be convened by the Session on the Lord's Day, and at other suitable times, for prayer, praise, the presenting and expounding of the Holy Scriptures, and exhortation, or the reading of a sermon of some approved minister. In like manner, Christians whose lot is cast in destitute regions ought to meet regularly for the worship of God.
This all seems like an artificial division to me. What are the Scriptural justifications we have for dividing up these two things?
It is artificial. It comes from the desire to make a distinction between an ordained preacher and one who is not. The only one that would know for sure if the one speaking was "preaching" or "exhorting" would be the actual one who is "preaching" or "exhorting."If i'm not mistaken, in the PCA any man approved by the Session can exhort but you must be a Teaching Elder to preach.
From the BCO...
4-5. Churches without teaching elders ought not to forsake the assembling of themselves together, but should be convened by the Session on the Lord's Day, and at other suitable times, for prayer, praise, the presenting and expounding of the Holy Scriptures, and exhortation, or the reading of a sermon of some approved minister. In like manner, Christians whose lot is cast in destitute regions ought to meet regularly for the worship of God.
I would think that the distinction is not in the act of preaching/exhorting itself, but rather in the authority that the act is carried out in.
19-1.
[ . . . ]
A ruling elder, a candidate for the ministry, a minister from some other denomination, or some other man may be licensed for the purpose of regularly providing the preaching of the Word upon his giving satisfaction to the Presbytery of his gifts and passing the licensure examination
If i'm not mistaken, in the PCA any man approved by the Session can exhort but you must be a Teaching Elder to preach.
From the BCO...
I would think that the distinction is not in the act of preaching/exhorting itself, but rather in the authority that the act is carried out in.4-5. Churches without teaching elders ought not to forsake the assembling of themselves together, but should be convened by the Session on the Lord's Day, and at other suitable times, for prayer, praise, the presenting and expounding of the Holy Scriptures, and exhortation, or the reading of a sermon of some approved minister. In like manner, Christians whose lot is cast in destitute regions ought to meet regularly for the worship of God.
Not quite.
The PCA's BCO doesn't really make a consistent distinction between "preaching" and "exhorting", and I'm thankful. The bifurcation between them is... stupid semantics, to be frank.19-1.
[ . . . ]
A ruling elder, a candidate for the ministry, a minister from some other denomination, or some other man may be licensed for the purpose of regularly providing the preaching of the Word upon his giving satisfaction to the Presbytery of his gifts and passing the licensure examination

If i'm not mistaken, in the PCA any man approved by the Session can exhort but you must be a Teaching Elder to preach.
From the BCO...
I would think that the distinction is not in the act of preaching/exhorting itself, but rather in the authority that the act is carried out in.
Not quite.
The PCA's BCO doesn't really make a consistent distinction between "preaching" and "exhorting", and I'm thankful. The bifurcation between them is... stupid semantics, to be frank.19-1.
[ . . . ]
A ruling elder, a candidate for the ministry, a minister from some other denomination, or some other man may be licensed for the purpose of regularly providing the preaching of the Word upon his giving satisfaction to the Presbytery of his gifts and passing the licensure examination
Good job, Rae! I was about to post that exact comment until I read your post.
By the way, BCO 19 is a reason why (pace Tim Keller) the "a woman may do anything in worship an unordained man may do" mantra is complete bunk.
I kind of doubt that most guys who say that are including preaching in their "anything", but they need to be more careful with what they say.I agree with Chris and Rae. It is an artificial distinction, and one grounded in church politics. Avoid it. Technically speaking, exhortation is a subset of the preaching (2 Tim. 4:2, Tit. 2:15), and is a term that is used to describe even the fully authoritative proclamation of the apostles (Acts 2:40).
As a dear seminary prof, and former pastor of mine, once said regarding this silly debate, "Call it whatever you want, but if a man gets behind the pulpit and isn't preaching, I don't want to hear it." He knew it was artificial, and that it avoids the heart of the matter (which is not office related).