arapahoepark
Puritan Board Professor
I am curious as to where 1689 Federalists stand on the issue of baptizing believers that avoids the half way covenant-esque, testimony driven and revivalistic approach. I.e. have to be of a certain age to have faith with a dramatic conversion story or massive sense of sinfulness before conversion, etc. Don't get me wrong, I am not against dramatic conversions but, in many places this seems to be the blueprint.
I was doing some reading of Riddlebarger and Horton on Modern Reformation and they tend to assume the way avoid the revivalistic tendancies is to be paedo-baptists.
What was the Reformed Baptist response to Finney and his minions of the Second Great Awakening? The first Great Awakening?
I was doing some reading of Riddlebarger and Horton on Modern Reformation and they tend to assume the way avoid the revivalistic tendancies is to be paedo-baptists.
What was the Reformed Baptist response to Finney and his minions of the Second Great Awakening? The first Great Awakening?