NASB 95 vs NASB 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

Herald

Administrator
Staff member
I admit to a bit of ignorance on the reason why the Lockman Foundation updated the NASB in 2020. I've noticed some pronounced differences between both translations. For instance, NASB 1995 renders John 1:5 as, "The Light shines in the darkness , and the darkness does not comprehend it." The 2020 version changes the word "comprehend" to "grasp".

So, what gives here?
 
I admit to a bit of ignorance on the reason why the Lockman Foundation updated the NASB in 2020. I've noticed some pronounced differences between both translations. For instance, NASB 1995 renders John 1:5 as, "The Light shines in the darkness , and the darkness does not comprehend it." The 2020 version changes the word "comprehend" to "grasp".

So, what gives here?
“Grasp” is the perfect translation in my opinion because the English word captures the same semantic range as the Greek word “katelaben.”
 
I appreciate that while the CSB uses the word "overcome," in its footnotes it says "or grasp or comprehend or overtake; John 12:35"
The NIV uses the word "overcome" but its footnote says, "Or understood"

The NET translates it with the word "mastered" and its note is extensive (BTW - even though I don't use the NET as a translation very often, its notes are often very helpful and should be consulted regularly... and I think that's the case here...): "Or “comprehended it,” or “overcome it.” The verb κατέλαβεν (katelaben) is not easy to translate. “To seize” or “to grasp” is possible, but this also permits “to grasp with the mind” in the sense of “to comprehend” (esp. in the middle voice). This is probably another Johannine double meaning—one does not usually think of darkness as trying to “understand” light. For it to mean this, “darkness” must be understood as meaning “certain people,” or perhaps “humanity” at large, darkened in understanding. But in John’s usage, darkness is not normally used of people or a group of people. Rather it usually signifies the evil environment or ‘sphere’ in which people find themselves: “They loved darkness rather than light” (John 3:19). Those who follow Jesus do not walk in darkness (8:12). They are to walk while they have light, lest the darkness “overtake/overcome” them (12:35, same verb as here). For John, with his set of symbols and imagery, darkness is not something which seeks to “understand (comprehend)” the light, but represents the forces of evil which seek to “overcome (conquer)” it. The English verb “to master” may be used in both sorts of contexts, as “he mastered his lesson” and “he mastered his opponent.”
 
I admit to a bit of ignorance on the reason why the Lockman Foundation updated the NASB in 2020. I've noticed some pronounced differences between both translations. For instance, NASB 1995 renders John 1:5 as, "The Light shines in the darkness , and the darkness does not comprehend it." The 2020 version changes the word "comprehend" to "grasp".

So, what gives here?
I’m not a fan of the 2020 update, but I don’t think that change impacts the meaning at all. Ppl who don’t comprehend something don’t grasp it. So I think it’s no big deal.
 
I appreciate that while the CSB uses the word "overcome," in its footnotes it says "or grasp or comprehend or overtake; John 12:35"
The NIV uses the word "overcome" but its footnote says, "Or understood"

The NET translates it with the word "mastered" and its note is extensive (BTW - even though I don't use the NET as a translation very often, its notes are often very helpful and should be consulted regularly... and I think that's the case here...): "Or “comprehended it,” or “overcome it.” The verb κατέλαβεν (katelaben) is not easy to translate. “To seize” or “to grasp” is possible, but this also permits “to grasp with the mind” in the sense of “to comprehend” (esp. in the middle voice). This is probably another Johannine double meaning—one does not usually think of darkness as trying to “understand” light. For it to mean this, “darkness” must be understood as meaning “certain people,” or perhaps “humanity” at large, darkened in understanding. But in John’s usage, darkness is not normally used of people or a group of people. Rather it usually signifies the evil environment or ‘sphere’ in which people find themselves: “They loved darkness rather than light” (John 3:19). Those who follow Jesus do not walk in darkness (8:12). They are to walk while they have light, lest the darkness “overtake/overcome” them (12:35, same verb as here). For John, with his set of symbols and imagery, darkness is not something which seeks to “understand (comprehend)” the light, but represents the forces of evil which seek to “overcome (conquer)” it. The English verb “to master” may be used in both sorts of contexts, as “he mastered his lesson” and “he mastered his opponent.”

The NET note is helpful, but it frames the verb as if the darkness were attempting something. John's syntax doesn't require that. He does not say the darkness tried to understand the light but failed, or that the darkness attempted to overpower the light but could not. He simply states οὐ κατέλαβεν -- did not comprehend, did not grasp, did not seize. There is no implication of attempted action. It is a pure negation. The double meaning fits because the verb is negated. (Incidentally, the English word "comprehend" originally contained both senses: to grasp with the mind and to encompass, though modern usage tends to favour the first.) John's negation allows both senses to stand without implying that darkness is actively striving in either direction.
 
"comprehend" to "grasp".
I think the scholars on this thread arguing the Greek are making the issue too difficult.

The simpler answer is that 'comprehend' probably has too many letters for current college graduates to comprehend. One needs it simple enough for folks coming out of the current education system to grasp.

Even before the Covid educational interruption "A 2017 study found that only 32% of college freshmen read at a 12th-grade proficiency level. More recently, 54% of U.S. adults were found to read below a 6th-grade proficiency. " https://harvardindependent.com/we-cant-read-and-its-not-because-of-that-phone/

Post Fauci, things have gotten worse. "Average scores for age 9 students in 2022 declined 5 points in reading and 7 points in mathematics compared to 2020." https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=38
 
The NET note is helpful, but it frames the verb as if the darkness were attempting something. John's syntax doesn't require that. He does not say the darkness tried to understand the light but failed, or that the darkness attempted to overpower the light but could not. He simply states οὐ κατέλαβεν -- did not comprehend, did not grasp, did not seize. There is no implication of attempted action. It is a pure negation. The double meaning fits because the verb is negated. (Incidentally, the English word "comprehend" originally contained both senses: to grasp with the mind and to encompass, though modern usage tends to favour the first.) John's negation allows both senses to stand without implying that darkness is actively striving in either direction.
Correct, syntax alone isn't determinative. But for me the contextual argument provided by the NET note is convincing with the thematic overlap with John 12:35 sealing the deal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top