How do we define trinitarian and christological errors as heresy? As damnable? Those who hold them as wolves? As being outside the faith? Are the boundaries strictly theological or also ones of attitude, context, consistency and soteriological implication? How harshly do we define the following...
The late-seventeenth century reformed Dutch theologian Peter van Mastricht wrote Theoretical-Practical Theology (RHB). It is in my opinion the best systematic theology existent in English. Volume 4 is out, on Christ’s Person, filled with wonderful material.
Three topics in the volume...
christ
christ's human nature
communicationofproperties
communion of natures
conception
ensoulment
lutheranism
mary
metaphysics
perpetual virginity of mary
peter van mastricht
romanism
soul
How is it said that God purchased the Church with his blood (Acts 20:28), when God does not have blood? The answer is that it was Christ who bled, who is both God and man.
The attribution of the properties of one of Christ’s natures to the other (such as in Acts 20:28) is called the doctrine...
christ
christ's human nature
christology
communicationofproperties
communion of natures
divinity of christ
hypostatic union
lutheranism
reformed theology
reformedbooksonline
resources available