A "Good as New" translation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, that was the glaring heresy, of course. I'm OK with the rest of it...;)
Ironically, Calvin taught that "the word 'baptise' means to immerse" (Institutes 4.15.19)! And not all of the 16th century Anabaptists (if I may lump them together - which is not really acceptable) immersed!
Mind you, I didn't know that there are any glaring heresies in Scripture. :wave:
 
Last edited:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!


canterbury.jpg
 
Dieter, though this was posted firmly tongue in cheek, if your post was meant as a rebuke against trivializing scripture, I gladly accept it; I did not mean to offend or break any commandments! :handshake:

If, however, the comment is that "John the Dipper" "dips" and the context is the "Good as New" "translation", then I would, with clean conscience, be able to say that though there are indeed 'no heresies in the Bible', this is NOT a Bible and thus does not fall within the parameters of that statement. I think I can say with 99% surety that this is not the thrust of your comment, but just in case. :)

How people can put this sort of thing up for sale as the Word of God is beyond me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top