Ianterrell
Puritan Board Sophomore
I really think I agree with Van Til's arguements for the presup-apologetic, but I am having a difficult time thinking practically about applying it. Could someone (preferably an adherant to the method) please create a brief sketch of how the Van Tillian apologetic works in contrast to a "classical", or "evidentialist" approach?
I would really appreciate it.
I would really appreciate it.