I have found it interesting that some seem to identify and hold CT exclusive to the view held by the Reformers, ie infant baptism, and yet did not the CT Baptists agree to pretty much all items save for that thing though?As I said I do have problems with Reformed Baptist theology, but I think there is a problem using the word dispensational in this way. As I said dispensationalism as a theological system did not exist prior to the 19 century. It simply did not (the 1689 Baptist confession is a 17 century document). The concept of the covenant itself is defended in the WCF 7:1, and this is the same in the 1689 confession. Further the 1689 confession develops the pactum salutis, the historia salutis and the ordo salutis in 7:2 and 7:3. These are distinct Reformed terms. One may or may not like the way the way the 1689 confession structures its cvenantal framework but this is not the same as calling it dispensational.
Holding to the One people of God, one saved out Body , based upon the election of God will be more the heart of CT it seems to me.