Originally posted by Peter
This is a subject I've been curious about lately. Someone on the PB posted an article by Von Mises and I know Gary North is a regular contributor at Lew Rockwell. Is the Austrian School true/biblical?
The Mises Institute tends to support cultural conservatism and Christianity... I could dig up a few quotes to support this... It depends on which economist it is... Mises himself was an Austrian Jew for example, and I'm not sure about whether he came to faith but he hasn't been with us for thirty plus years. They kind of came together as a school of thought in later twentieth-century, and were desemminated by scholars and eventually earned the appellation of
Austrian economists. Austrian doesn't mean that they are all of Austrian nationality BTW... only that the school of thought had it's luminaries from Austria.
The late Swiss economist Wilhelm Roepke is one of the better ones In my humble opinion, and emphasizes the moral dimension without the sterile utilitarian creed of secular economists. His most renowned work is the
Humane Economy:
In the
Humane Economy, Röpke surmised that: "The market economy, and with social and political freedom, can thrive only as part and under the protection of a bourgeois system. This implies the existence of a society in which certain fundamentals are respected and color the whole network of social relationships: individual effort and responsibility, absolute norms and values, independence based on ownership, prudence and daring, calculating and saving, responsibility for planning one's own life, proper coherence with the community, family feeling, a sense of tradition and the succession of generations combined with an open-minded view of the present and the future, proper tension between individual and community, firm moral discipline, respect for the value of money, the courage to grapple on one's own with life and its uncertainties, a sense of the natural order of things, and a firm scale of values." To answer those who might sneer at this, Röpke nimbly replies, "Whoever turns his nose up at these things... suspects them of being 'reactionary'... may in all seriousness be asked what ideals he intends to defend against Communism without having to borrow from it."
[Edited on 9-6-2005 by Puritanhead]