I thought his historical insights were helpful and apt. I like to see him critiquing the critics, the literati. And, he is obviously a gifted communicator.
I was less taken with his proposals, although he does have a sense of the impending failures of the larger society. In short, I appreciate his descriptions better than his prescriptions.
And where is his confidence that the Calvinist-remnant will continue to do it's Providentially appointed work, regardless of their "size" and apparent power? Is this not the confounding way of our God--always succeeding by losing, so far as the world can see?
Thanks for the article.