Commentary on Malachi

Status
Not open for further replies.
Andrew, by now you may have read my post in the Church History forum and wondered what is wrong with me. Well, I posted before I scanned through the rest of that forum and saw your other posts, and it was several minutes later when I found your post here about Moore's work. Thank you for the suggestion. :handshake:
 
Ezekiel3626 said:
Andrew, by now you may have read my post in the Church History forum and wondered what is wrong with me. Well, I posted before I scanned through the rest of that forum and saw your other posts, and it was several minutes later when I found your post here about Moore's work. Thank you for the suggestion. :handshake:
Click to expand...

No prob, brother!
thumbup.gif
 
I am presently preaching through Malachi. For a newer commentary I have found Pieter A. Verhoef in the NICOT helpful. Walter Kaiser had a small book on Malachi, that although it had some unhelpful stuff was a starter in terms of application.
 
brother. King, what text are you currently on? I am currently in what T.V. Moore defines as section II (1:6-2:9). For the last few days I have been meditating on v. 10 of chapter 1.
 
Spurgeon wanted to acquire Thomas Watson's The Great Gain of Godliness, a study on Malachi 3.16-18, but it was not available to him -- it is now available as as Puritan Paperback.

Spurgeon:

WATSON (THOMAS. Puritan). Notes on Malachy III. 8vo. 1682. 'This would be a great find if we could only come at it, for Watson is one of the clearest and liveliest of Puritan authors. We fear we shall never see this commentary, for we have tried to obtain it, and tried in vain.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Ezekiel3626 said:
brother. King, what text are you currently on? I am currently in what T.V. Moore defines as section II (1:6-2:9). For the last few days I have been meditating on v. 10 of chapter 1.
Click to expand...

This past Sabbath I preached on Malachi 1.6-14. I am currently attempting to judge just how much of chapter 2 I will do next.
 
VirginiaHuguenot said:
Spurgeon wanted to acquire Thomas Watson's The Great Gain of Godliness, a study on Malachi 3.16-18, but it was not available to him -- it is now available as as Puritan Paperback.

Spurgeon:
Click to expand...

Thanks for the lead. I still have some time to get the book before I reach that point! There is nothing quite like finding out about a great book that could have helped you with a passage or sermon series the week after one has just preached the text. I will avoid it this time.
 
VirginiaHuguenot said:
Spurgeon wanted to acquire Thomas Watson's The Great Gain of Godliness, a study on Malachi 3.16-18, but it was not available to him -- it is now available as as Puritan Paperback.

Spurgeon:
Click to expand...

Thank you Andrew, I have also acquired this little volume recently. Following is a footnote at the end of the publisher's preface: "Interestingly, there is now a copy in the C.H. Spurgeon collection of the Curry Library, William Jewell College, Liberty, Missouri. The College acquired Spurgeon's private library containing thousands of volumes when it was put up for sale for L500 in 1905." I assume that means 500 pounds. I have not finished reading the book yet, but as other Watson writings, it is very thorough.
 
Ezekiel3626 said:
May I ask what are your thoughts on v. 10?
Click to expand...

Malachi 1:10 (King James Version)


10Who is there even among you that would shut the doors for nought? neither do ye kindle fire on mine altar for nought. I have no pleasure in you, saith the LORD of hosts, neither will I accept an offering at your hand.

What do you want to know? The corrupt worship offered by the priests is worse than no worship at all. The priests were charged with keeping the sanctuary from the profane things but here they are the cause of the profane things being offered. God does not stand in need of our worship. Even as the priests thought that God's worship and name were contemptible and took no pleasure in him, neither will he take any pleasure in them.

The temple was to be that place where sinful man could come and worship God and have fellowship with him through a mediator. God is here declaring he would rather have them shut out of his presence. The church needs to take this seriously. We serve a majestic God who is a great King. We do not desrve to be in his presence as sinners. It is by grace we are enabled to come near and worship him. Some of us need to take worship much more seriously. It is not a mere ritual. It is not a matter of personal choice as to what is right and wrong in worship, it is not something we should take for granted. For we may find that God will take no pleasure in corrupt worship and remove our lampstand all together.

I am not sure if any of this gets at what you are interested in?
 
My reason for asking is simple, brother. King. As I work my way through the text, I stumbled at v. 10. I do not mean to say that the other verses were "easy", it is just that my train of thought was derailed by this verse. I slowed down and have been spending some extra time so that I may be able to understand better what the LORD was saying here through Malachi. I find the first part, concerning the closing of the doors, most troublesome. Calvin interprets this to mean that the priests, even in their doorkeeping duties, have utterly failed. I have no problem with that interpretation. I do, however, struggle to see the implication of the adverb rendered "in vain". Some interpret this to mean that the LORD wonders why no priest rose up in indignation over the blatant disregard and disrespect being shown by the Israelites, and allowed by the complacent priesthood. An example of the attitude considered appropriate may perhaps be found in Numbers 25: 1-13. I simply desired to talk with you since perhaps the text and your expositions were still fresh in your mind. You strike me as a pious and diligent student, and I sought your input only as one seeking advice. Thank you for your comments.
 
Richard Stock wrote THE Puritan commentary on Malachi. It's never been reprinted in a modern format, but would be available through Early English Books Online of you have access to that wonderful program.

Don Kistler
 
Don Kistler said:
Richard Stock wrote THE Puritan commentary on Malachi. It's never been reprinted in a modern format, but would be available through Early English Books Online of you have access to that wonderful program.

Don Kistler
Click to expand...

Thanks for that tip, Dr. Kistler! I'm adding it to my list and look forward to reading it someday, dv.

Richard Stock, English Puritan (c. 1569 - April 20, 1626) -- DNB entry here.
 
I just recently purchased "The Minor Prophets" volume 2 by James M Boice. It has Micah though Malachi. :book2:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

P
  • Locked
Sermon Series on Malachi
Replies
21
Views
5K
DTK
D
Southern Presbyterian
  • Locked
Online Commentaries on Malachi
Replies
7
Views
5K
Pilgrim72
Pilgrim72
chuckd
  • Locked
Fulfillment of Malachi
Replies
3
Views
2K
Contra_Mundum
Contra_Mundum
jjraby
  • Locked
Malachi 4:1-3
Replies
0
Views
2K
jjraby
jjraby
Puritan Sailor
  • Locked
Malachi 2:16 Hebrew help
Replies
1
Views
4K
fredtgreco
fredtgreco
Back
Top