For research purposes, I saw it. It will be part of future articles and so forth.
From a movie perspective, it was exceedingly boring, miscast (Hanks seemed lost) and seemed low budget (even if it did cost 230 million to make.) It was uncharacteristic of Ron Howard. But hey, when the devil puts you up to making a movie like this....what can one expect?
Theologically it was blasphemous, and an attempt to demonstrate Christ's non-divinity. It was everything a God-hater would purport to glorify the fallennes of man and the exaltation of the devil.
The point of the Langhorn character was to show "Christ was just a man, that's all." The whole "Da Vinci" painting fiasco was so stupid, I can't believe people left the theater saying, "good stuff." It was not convincing at all. It really was, for anyone thinking, really idiotic.
In any case, The Wild Boar will have some things to say, as well as some researched articles later on when I am over the flu.