Originally posted by Paul manata
Originally posted by fivepointcalvinist
Anyone familiar with Plantinga's work? Apparently he is a Calvinist, yet he uses the Free Will Defense to answer the problem of evil. Thoughts?
He's not a Calvinist.
His free will argument (though he believes in libertarian free will) is meant to be a response ot the *logical* problem of evil.
As he says, it does not assume that we really have free will. All it seeks to establish is that there is a possible world where God and evil can coexist (i.e., since the *logical* problem implies that God's existence is *impossible* then if it can be shown that there can be a *possible* world where evil and God can co-exist, then he's defeated the charge of contradiction, *even if* libertarian will is false in this world).
This possible world argument is what he developes in his Free Will Defense.
Most atheologians admit that Plantinga has shown that the *logical* problem of evil has no teeth.
Obviously, we don't agree with argument. Also, there's no possible world where God is the sovereign Lord over all amd omniscient in the reformed sense (i.e., the biblical God) and libertarian free will simultaneously exists.