Government vs. Science

[PuritanCovenanter]

Ryan is at it again.

Here is an interview he has done for LewRockwell.com.
Check it out.
Govenment vs. Science

Go gett'um Puritanhead.

 

[RamistThomist]

But many of the high priests of science have something to hide "“ from blind intolerance of religion to jealous guarding of their federally financed research budgets

That is too good.

 

[Puritanhead]

My next plan is to read, review and interview conservative Congressman J.D. Hayworth of Arizona about his new book, Whatever It Takes: Illegal Immigration, Border Security and the War on Terror, and submit it to the American Spectator magazine, which Tom Bethell incidentally edits. Also, I will be publishing a review on Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William J. Watkins, Jr. within the month hopefully. I will also appear in a magazine this spring/summer having reviewed Complicity : How the North Promoted, Prolonged, and Profited from Slavery which I did on assignment, and I have confirmed its future publication with the editor.

God wiling, I'm gonna make Law Review if I ever go back to law school.

 

[crhoades]

I can't believe Ryan put "the" United States twice in the article instead of "these" United States...LOLOLOL...There's still time to edit it. Of course it is correct to say "the" now. Maybe the other is wishful thinking...

 

[Puritanhead]

Originally posted by crhoades
I can't believe Ryan put "the" United States twice in the article instead of "these" United States...LOLOLOL...There's still time to edit it. Of course it is correct to say "the" now. Maybe the other is wishful thinking...

Heck, the consolidators won-- one might as well let the nostalgia go, and have truth in advertising... if only the other 260,000,000 Americans were like me and Jacob, than this would be a free country.

 

[Puritanhead]

Free chapter preview of the Politically Incorrect Guide to Science

 

[Me Died Blue]

Moving to the Library

 

[Puritanhead]

BTW I hope people here know the difference between microevolution and macroevolution-- and won't think I've got humanist by entertaining notion of the former, which is tantamount to the concept of genetic drift.

 

[Bladestunner316]

Go Get em PatriotHead!!!!

 

[Scott]

Good job, Ryan

 

[ChristianTrader]

Originally posted by Puritanhead
BTW I hope people here know the difference between microevolution and macroevolution-- and won't think I've got humanist by entertaining notion of the former, which is tantamount to the concept of genetic drift.

I dont have an inherent problem with the terms used, however I would personally like to avoid the word evolution in toto. It has the conotation of some organism randomly becoming "better". I however cannot currently think of a word that expresses the idea, "genetic change guided by the inherent character of the organism".

 

[Answerman]

I like to use the term devolution, since it is a more accurate term for what we have actually observe in biological organisms.

Here is how the Webster's New World dictionary defines it:

Devolution: under useage #6 (in Biology) evolution of structures toward greater simplicity or disappearance; degeneration.

 

[Scott]

David: Excellent point.

 

[Puritanhead]

Gentleman, I believe the technical term is Second Law of Thermodynamics or entropy. It might be a law of physics, but it's also the consequence of living in fallen world. It is a monkeywrench in macroevolution.

 

[Puritanhead]

I thought it was cool finding out that Dr. George Gilder of the Discovery Institute referenced my interview in one of his publications.