[quote:ec525c7ebe][i:ec525c7ebe]Originally posted by rembrandt[/i:ec525c7ebe]
[quote:ec525c7ebe][i:ec525c7ebe]Originally posted by Me Died Blue[/i:ec525c7ebe]
Another context in which you may have heard the term is in churches or individuals having a "high doctrine" of the church, the Scriptures, the sacraments, etc. As I've heard it used, having a "high doctrine" of something basically means that you hold [i:ec525c7ebe]utmost[/i:ec525c7ebe] reverence for it, and strongly believe the Bible to have given it an [i:ec525c7ebe]extremely[/i:ec525c7ebe] high, specific place in the Christian's life. For instance, the Roman Catholic Church and the Greek Orthodox Church both have a "higher" doctrine of the Church that do historic Anglican, Lutheran, Methodist and Presbyterian churches, yet those churches have a "higher" doctrine of the church than do the Assemblies of God, the Evangelical Free Churches, the Churches of God, and the Churches of the Nazarene. Furthermore, Reformed Theological Seminary has a "higher" doctrine of the Scriptures than does Fuller Theological Seminary.
Hope this helps clarify.
In Christ,
Chris [/quote:ec525c7ebe]
What is the critera that we use to say that a church has a "higher" doctrine of eccelesiology than another church? Is it in their government and dogmatics etc.? [/quote:ec525c7ebe]
What I basically had in mind was that someone's doctrine of something gets "higher" as they place more binding relevance and authority in our lives upon it.
In Christ,
Chris