Blood-Bought Pilgrim
Puritan Board Sophomore
This may be a bad question to begin with, so feel free to offer as much correction as you'd like, but here it is: After the Fall, is the creation mandate fulfilled primarily through natural means, and thus it remains distinct from redemption and the spiritual things of the gospel? Or is the creation mandate primarily fulfilled through Christ's redemption of the world and subjection of the world to his rule? Or would you offer a different, more nuanced answer?
I ask because of some discussions I've had recently where the creation mandate seems to be used to more or less justify (or at least potentially justify) worldly ambitions in an unhealthy way. I'm trying to get a better grasp on the way in which the subversive, counter-intuitive ways of taking dominion of the gospel relates to the creation mandate.
Suggested excerpts for reading are welcome too, though at the moment I can't honestly say I have the bandwidth to add many full books to my plate.
I ask because of some discussions I've had recently where the creation mandate seems to be used to more or less justify (or at least potentially justify) worldly ambitions in an unhealthy way. I'm trying to get a better grasp on the way in which the subversive, counter-intuitive ways of taking dominion of the gospel relates to the creation mandate.
Suggested excerpts for reading are welcome too, though at the moment I can't honestly say I have the bandwidth to add many full books to my plate.