Is Dancing Lawful?

Is dancing lawful?

  • Yes

    Votes: 69 84.1%
  • No

    Votes: 5 6.1%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 8 9.8%

  • Total voters
    82
Status
Not open for further replies.

AV1611

Puritan Board Senior
Some at the church I attend have been trying to organise a dance on the lines of this. I have spoken out against it and I was wondering what your thoughts were?

Standard Bearer - V.60 - I.2 - Strength of Youth - The Christian and Dancing (1) By Rev. Ronald L. Cammenga
Standard Bearer - V.60 - I.6 - Strength of Youth - The Christian and Dancing (2) By Rev. Ronald L. Cammenga

"1. Concerning "dancing" (or going to Balls), I only ask Christians to judge the amusement by its tendencies and accomplishments. To say there is anything morally wrong in the mere bodily act of dancing would be absurd. David danced before the ark. Solomon said, "There is a time to dance" (Ecclesiastes 3:4). Just as it is natural to lambs and kittens to frisk about, so it seems natural to young people, all over the world, to jump about to a lively tune of music. If dancing were taken up for mere exercise, if dancing took place at early hours, and men only danced with men, and women with women, it would be needless and absurd to object to it. But everybody knows that this is not what is meant by modern dancing (going to Balls and dances). This is an amusement which involves very late hours, extravagant dressing, and an immense amount of frivolity, vanity, jealousy, unhealthy excitement, and vain conversation. Who would like to be found in a modern dance-hall when the Lord Jesus Christ comes the second time? Who that has taken much part in balls and dancing, as I myself once did before I knew better, can deny that they have a most dissipating effect on the mind, like using drugs and the drinking of alcoholic beverages does on the body? I cannot withhold my opinion that dancing and the going to balls is one of those worldly amusements which "war against the soul," and which it is wisest and best to give up. And as for those parents who urge their sons and daughters, against their wills and inclinations, to go to balls and dances, I can only say that they are taking on themselves a most dangerous responsibility, and risking great injury to their children's souls." - J C Ryle
 
I truly believe it depends on the KIND of dancing. In general no; certain kinds yes. And I don't believe such a thing should take place at a church...as a community event in a common arena, yes.
 
I truly believe it depends on the KIND of dancing. In general no; certain kinds yes. And I don't believe such a thing should take place at a church...as a community event in a common arena, yes.

I am refering to mixed dancing.
 
Even "mixed dancing", it depends on the KIND of dancing. There is folk dance (including round, square, and double lined not to be mistaken as line dancing, formal ball room dancing, salsas and other such, R&B, rock & pop, ballet, modern, swing, line dancing.

Certain kinds of dance, and within proper context and restraints of propriety...I have no problem with. I'm pretty strict in my views, but I would not toss out "mixed dancing" altogether. We must look at the context and the purpose of the event as well.
 
I truly believe it depends on the KIND of dancing. In general no; certain kinds yes. And I don't believe such a thing should take place at a church...as a community event in a common arena, yes.[/quote
I am refering to mixed dancing.
*gasp* You mean like if guys and girls are attracted to each other or friendly they should resist dancing? Bumping and grinding fo' sure but a sweet little ball room fox trot, line dance or jitterbug isn't going to fly in the face of decency.
Let 'em dance I say, no harm done.
 
JC Ryle was only writing on the immediate, local variety of dances and events that he saw around him. He made a blanket statement that we cannot make.
 
Dancing is bad when I do it! I have two-left feet.....In retrospect I am glad my Sr. Prom date had a VERY good sense of humor!;)
 
Even "mixed dancing", it depends on the KIND of dancing. There is folk dance (including round, square, and double lined not to be mistaken as line dancing, formal ball room dancing, salsas and other such, R&B, rock & pop, ballet, modern, swing, line dancing.

Certain kinds of dance, and within proper context and restraints of propriety...I have no problem with. I'm pretty strict in my views, but I would not toss out "mixed dancing" altogether. We must look at the context and the purpose of the event as well.

:agree:

It depends on whether or not the type of dancing being engaged in is lust-provoking or not.
 
I suspect that this is one of those things that IS lawful but not always profitable.
Like if you are doing the hustle or the macarena.

A Texas Two step is fine and Cotton Eyed Joe may be done lawfully if you say "whoop whoop."
 
The Virginia Reel was one of my favorites.

[video=youtube;Xx2YYb54cwU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx2YYb54cwU[/video]
 
Last edited:
Just curious. Those of you who are married, did you have dancing at your reception? I regret now that we didn't.
 
Lawful, not always profitable. :up:

That being said, I can't imagine lawfully dancing with anyone but my wife.
 
Lawful, not always beneficial.

We did ballroom dancing in high school. I found it to be not in the least bit erotic or lust evoking, so I don't think it can be ruled out on those grounds. The girls did all wear very low cut dresses though, which did evoke lustful thoughts - but that was not the fault of the dancing per se. Whenever I have been to a nightclub I have found myself bored out of my mind, standing around waiting for something to happen, and wondering how people can really be so excited by bumping up and down on the spot for hours on end in time to incomprehensible music.

Such dancing is probably designed to provoke lust, and as such would normally be prohibited, except where that would be allowable such as with married couples. But given that it isn't I can't find any reason to prohibit it.

The most fun I ever had dancing was when I was 16 at a bush dance* and me and a mate of mine threw each other around the dance floor as hard as we could.

*Bush dancing: An attempt to replicate the kind of entertainment that poor rural Australians in the late 19th century might have engaged in; hence the title. Usually involves fiddles, violins, guitars and other such instruments. Dancing itself is based on Scottish or Irish folk dancing. Sometimes includes a lagerphone, a uniquely Australian contribution to world music, which consists of a stick with beer bottle lids nailed into it being banged against the floor in time with the music. Yes, really.
 
Lawful, not always beneficial.
Whenever I have been to a nightclub I have found myself bored out of my mind, standing around waiting for something to happen, and wondering how people can really be so excited by bumping up and down on the spot for hours on end in time to incomprehensible music.

You kind of have to be drunk to enjoy it . . . :blush: . . .
 
I was actually a bit surprised by how much Durham condemned dancing in his exposition of the ten commandments. I imagine this is typically Puritan. He seemed to indicate in the work that some Church councils actually condemned the practice.

He wasn't just arguing against young unmarried men/women dancing either (that case could be made much easier) but dancing in general.
 
I was actually a bit surprised by how much Durham condemned dancing in his exposition of the ten commandments.

Sounds like a good chap ;)

Matther writes:

The National Synod of Dort, A. 1578. Thus Express themselves.

"Because Dances are for the most part attended with a levity, unbecoming Christians, and are an offence to the Godly; Especially when practised in a Time of Common Danger and Calamity: they that go to Dances shall be Reproved; and if after divers Admonitions they persist therein, they are to be excluded from communion."​

The Discipline of the Reformed Churches in France, has this Article.

"Dancing is to be suppressed; and those that take the Liberty or Custome to Dance, after they have been several times admonished, shall be Excommunicated, when they shew themselves obstinate in their Rebellion. And the consistories are Exhorted well to put this Article into Execution, and to Read the same Publickly in the Name of God, and in the Authority of the Synods: And the said Synods and Colloquies are Exhorted to take heed of, and warn those Consistories that therein do not their Duties, to Censure the offenders for it.​
 
"Because Dances are for the most part attended with a levity, unbecoming Christians, and are an offence to the Godly; Especially when practised in a Time of Common Danger and Calamity:​
This, again, does not apply to all forms of dance.
 
I have no coordination whatsoever on the dance floor. I look like a wounded duck. That aside, nothing wrong with it. If the caveat has to be added, "It's okay so long as it's not vulgar" so be it. You can add the same warning to golf or clipping your toenails.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top