Justification Controversy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Were it someone else I would be interested in listening to it. Robbins's circle of orthodoxy is too small. Quite a few on this board would not fit in it.
 
The problem is, if so many were not interested in molly-coddling the purveyors of such new and dangerous teachings, no one would even have to listen to Robbins.
 
Originally posted by fredtgreco
The problem is, if so many were not interested in molly-coddling the purveyors of such new and dangerous teachings, no one would even have to listen to Robbins.

That is why I go to Ligon Duncan/Mark Dever any day over Robbins.
 
Originally posted by Draught Horse
Were it someone else I would be interested in listening to it. Robbins's circle of orthodoxy is too small. Quite a few on this board would not fit in it.

None of us would.
 
He was just promoting the Evangelical Presbyterian Church in his last newsletter. I kid you not. I found that a little odd.

[Edited on 5-23-2005 by puritancovenanter]
 
OOPS. I made a mistake. It isn't the EPC. It is theERPC. Sounds like we have a new denomination springing up due to the NPP/Auburn Avenue doctrines.
 
Thanks for the heads up on the posting from Bryan Chapell -- I appreciated how he connected the NPP issues to Federal Vision/Auburn Ave. controversy. I'm starting to get a clue on this issue now...
Reed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top