arapahoepark
Puritan Board Doctor
So reading The Future of Justification by Piper, I am not sure he rebuts enough Wright's notion that we Reformed are somehow confusing justification and effectual calling. In a previous thread I posted, apparently William Dumbrell saying something similar. Now it does not make sense the view that God just declares what already is; after all what's the point?
What other argues are there for justification as seperately as the acceptance/imputation or pardon rather than the declaration that it has happened in calling or regeneration?
What other argues are there for justification as seperately as the acceptance/imputation or pardon rather than the declaration that it has happened in calling or regeneration?