Knox & ‘particular redepmtpion’

[C4MERON]

John Knox the Scottish Reformer, rejected particular redemption/definite(limited) atonement? New one to me. Thoughts on this article anyone?

A Nestorian Heresy?: John Knox & His Rejection of Particular Redemption

Recently I was reading a wonderful scholarly book on Scottish theology and various Scottish theologians by Thomas. F. Torrance called Scottish Theology: From John Knox to John McLead Campbell which…

mcdanell99.wordpress.com

 

[RamistThomist]

More likely that Knox--like Calvin--wasn't addressing the same concerns that Owen was, and so you don't see Knox usually arguing for limited atonement. Moreover, he is probably working with--like Calvin--the Lombardian formula, sufficient for all, efficient for the elect.

I've read the book in question. Torrance never really makes the argument that a) Knox rejected LA, and b) LA is Nestorian. That claim has been floated around a lot, but it is hard to prove