Blood-Bought Pilgrim
Puritan Board Freshman
Are there folks out there who hold a general belief that the TR is the best text we have (even over against the MT) because of a high view of providential preservation, yet acknowledge there may be some places where corrections can be made? I've been growing more and more in the past couple years in a strong preference for the TR on both textual and theological grounds, yet I'm not willing to go as far as many of the prominent TR advocates I've heard in defending every single possible TR reading as beyond correction. Does anyone else hold this type of position? Am I just being illogical and not following all the way through? I'd be curious to hear thoughts on this.
A Note: I know this is an issue that has been played out a lot, so not trying to tire anyone with debate, just curious what views are out there.
A Note: I know this is an issue that has been played out a lot, so not trying to tire anyone with debate, just curious what views are out there.