Scott Bushey
Puritanboard Commissioner
Originally posted by Dan....
Scott,
As I have clearly stated to Matt today, if doing anything other than singing the Psalms in worship creates the possibility to break the RPW and sin, I am all for doing away with old habits, thus reducing the chance of sinning.
This could go both ways. For example, I will quote you and insert changes for the other side:
if ... singing [only] the Psalms in worship [in exclusion of hymns and spiritual songs] creates the possibility to break the RPW and sin, I am all for doing away with old habits, thus reducing the chance of sinning.
See the point? There may not only be the sin of commission, there may also be the sin of omission. Either the non-EP is sinning by commission, or the EP is sinning by omission.
I hope that made sense.
Dan,
I do see your point; However, I do not feel the conviction of ommission, based upon my studies on the subject. This is not to say that tomorrow I won't, but today I do not!
[Edited on 7-29-2005 by Scott Bushey]
. And this may have already been pointed out; I haven't made it that far through the thread. Has anyone discussed the "hymns" of the NT?
I for one do not believe translations are inspired (in the sense that the original authors were), rather God's Word is preserved providentially through the ages. But that was discussed ad nauseum on other threads.
to Scott. I really do not see what is so hard about the sin issue. Most of us who disagree on baptism have no problem acknowledging that one side is in sin for either going beyond God's command or ignoring part of it. The exact same principle applies here, since we all believe in the RPW. Can it be shown that there is a biblical command, either explicitly or by good and necessary consequence, to sing songs outside the Psalter after its completion? The answer to that question is the crux of which side is in sin, and I fail to understand what is so hard about that.