I do not believe this view to be biblical and the immediate verse that always comes to mind is “narrow is the gate” and “few enter”.
Whether you buy Warfield's thesis or not, you should read it.
It's a little long to paste into a post, so I attached a PDF of his paper. It has been my experience that few download attached files. Maybe this will be an exception. Everyone with interest in the future should read this. (11 pages)
ARE THEY FEW
THAT BE SAVED?
BY
BENJAMIN B. WARFIELD, D. D., LL. D., LITT. D.
Professor in Princeton Theological Seminary
He says, in essence, that [although] there are only about three places in the New Testament relied on for this negative conclusion, [my additions] that the entire momentum of the Bible, Old, and New Testaments, is towards the progressive success of the Gospel through the (future) faithfulness of the Church and the foolishness of preaching.
Most of the following words are mine. Warfield did not develop his thesis beyond discounting the negative verses mentioned above.
Let's be careful that we do not adopt the view of the ten spies in Numbers 13&14. As a result of their negative view of the future and the discouragement it caused to spread through the entire adult population, these three things happened. (Numbers 14)
- God brought judgment on the unbelief (disobedience) of 600,000 men of war. All the adults 20 years old and over were condemned to die in the wilderness. Only the two adults (Joshuah and Calib) believed God's promises were spared and allowed to enter the promised land.
- In the midsts of this judgment, God said, As I live, saith the Lord, the whole world will be full of my glory.
- But turning to the ten spies (teachers) that gave the bad report, God killed them on the spot.
The ratio of those that believe Matt. 28:18-20 has usually been, at least in the modern Church, 10 to 2 in favor of the spies' view. And that's being optimistic. Read the whole Bible from Genesis to Revelation and see if what I say isn't true. There are hundreds, perhaps a thousand times more evidence for a victorious Church than a defeated Christ. But modern Christians usually just spiritualize these passages into what is, in effect, Christ's Great Commission's failure. Go back at least to Gen 3:15.
EDIT: And I do not consider myself a Postmillianialist, in that I see no teaching that there is some future date when the millennium starts. I am with the Amills that we are now in the millennium.
=======
John 1:29 (KJV 1900)
The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
John 3:16,17 (KJV & ESV)
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.
1 John 4:14 (ESV)
14 And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent his Son to be the Savior of the world.
John 4:42 (ESV)
They said to the woman, “It is no longer because of what you said that we believe, for we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this is indeed the Savior of the world.”
[Note: Said by the Samaritans to the woman at the well.]
John 12:47 (KJV 1900)
And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.
John 17:21,23
21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
23 I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.
[Will this prayer of Christ ever be answered? Please, do not tell me that it has been completely fulfilled already.]
1 John 2:2 (ESV)
He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.
1 John 4:14
And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world.