panta dokimazete
Puritan Board Post-Graduate
Ok - I'll bite for a bit - although this really seems to be a complete sidetrack to the overall point and nonsensical in its approach to the argument.
That is to say - you have not proven that the argument is illogical, only that it may not conform to the formal rules of logic or that I am somehow conflating teaching and singing (which I have not) or being deliberately ambiguous or deceitful in my use of language (which I am not).
I am perfectly comfortable changing "teaches" in the second premise to command, since I contend that what the Scripture teaches, God commands us to obey.
P1 New covenant believers are commanded to be taught by as well as sing the Psalms to the Lord
P2 The Psalms command new songs be sung to the Lord
C1 New covenant believers are commanded to sing new songs as well as sing the Psalms to the Lord
Now, please interact with the premises - if one can be conclusively proven false, the conclusion is false. If not, you must reevaluate your dogmatic adherence to an erroneous doctrine.
And with that I say, good night and God bless you!
That is to say - you have not proven that the argument is illogical, only that it may not conform to the formal rules of logic or that I am somehow conflating teaching and singing (which I have not) or being deliberately ambiguous or deceitful in my use of language (which I am not).
I am perfectly comfortable changing "teaches" in the second premise to command, since I contend that what the Scripture teaches, God commands us to obey.
P1 New covenant believers are commanded to be taught by as well as sing the Psalms to the Lord
P2 The Psalms command new songs be sung to the Lord
C1 New covenant believers are commanded to sing new songs as well as sing the Psalms to the Lord
Now, please interact with the premises - if one can be conclusively proven false, the conclusion is false. If not, you must reevaluate your dogmatic adherence to an erroneous doctrine.
And with that I say, good night and God bless you!