E Nomine
Puritan Board Freshman
Has anyone has seen or read this book? Per AOMIN, Gipp is a notorious, incredible KJV Onlyist with a Doctorate he bought from a now-defunct diploma mill.
2006 Geneva Bible - The Trojan Horse
Description
The author states:
Recently a Bible has been promoted as the "1599 Geneva Bible" when, in fact, it is not. Unsuspecting Bible believers may be deceived into thinking it is safe to read and study from the "Grandfather" of the King James Bible. it isn't.
From the back cover:
Bible believers know the history of their Bible and know that the Geneva Bible was one of the early English translations. It was in the line along with the Wycliff, Tyndale, Camner, Great and Bishops' Bibles which led to the most popular Bible of all time, the King James Bible.
Recently, a Bible has been promoted as the "1599 Geneva Bible" when, in fact, it is not. Unsuspecting Bible believers may be deceived into thinking it is safe to read and study from the "Grandfather" of the King James Bible. It isn't.
I'm curious (but not enough to waste money on the book) what the author's argument is that the Tolle Lege 1599 Geneva Bible is not a faithful or legitimate reproduction of the original. I know there were many versions printed of the Geneva Bible, so I guess Gipp found a copy titled "1599 Geneva Bible" with variations from the Tolle Lege publicaton.
2006 Geneva Bible - The Trojan Horse
Description
The author states:
Recently a Bible has been promoted as the "1599 Geneva Bible" when, in fact, it is not. Unsuspecting Bible believers may be deceived into thinking it is safe to read and study from the "Grandfather" of the King James Bible. it isn't.
From the back cover:
Bible believers know the history of their Bible and know that the Geneva Bible was one of the early English translations. It was in the line along with the Wycliff, Tyndale, Camner, Great and Bishops' Bibles which led to the most popular Bible of all time, the King James Bible.
Recently, a Bible has been promoted as the "1599 Geneva Bible" when, in fact, it is not. Unsuspecting Bible believers may be deceived into thinking it is safe to read and study from the "Grandfather" of the King James Bible. It isn't.
I'm curious (but not enough to waste money on the book) what the author's argument is that the Tolle Lege 1599 Geneva Bible is not a faithful or legitimate reproduction of the original. I know there were many versions printed of the Geneva Bible, so I guess Gipp found a copy titled "1599 Geneva Bible" with variations from the Tolle Lege publicaton.