Justified
Puritan Board Sophomore
I have a couple questions with regard to the proper domain of science. First, is "creation science" a contradiction in terms? Once we allow the supernatural into the natural sciences, doesn't it cease to be what it is?
The next question is, are the historical sciences a valid endeavor? It's difficult to know, despite their usefulness, how well certain models comport with reality.
One last thought, though I haven't worked it out myself: does creation science and intelligent design arise from a conflation of the distinct categories of creation and providence?
Disclaimer: This thread isn't necessarily about the various exegetical merits of various positions on the interpretation of Genesis; this is merely about science as such.
The next question is, are the historical sciences a valid endeavor? It's difficult to know, despite their usefulness, how well certain models comport with reality.
One last thought, though I haven't worked it out myself: does creation science and intelligent design arise from a conflation of the distinct categories of creation and providence?
Disclaimer: This thread isn't necessarily about the various exegetical merits of various positions on the interpretation of Genesis; this is merely about science as such.