U
Username3000
Guest
Greetings,
I have been reading my ESV Study Bible today, and have two questions:
1. Does the Reformation Study Bible take a Sabbatarian stance, as opposed to the ESV Study Bible's anti-Sabbatarian stance? See note on Romans 14:5; notes for Romans by anti-Sabbatarian (I believe) Thomas Schreiner.
2. Does the Reformation SB take a decidedly covenantal stance, as opposed to the ESVSB's propensity to not take a stance at all on many issues, which then leaves the reader to interpret further?
I am finding the ESVSB to be troublesome when it leaves it up to the reader to interpret particular doctrines. It offers multiple views on some things, but doesn't say which is the truth. Useful for some people perhaps, but I would prefer an intentionally Reformed study Bible.
This is particularly frustrating in the area of covenantal vs New Covenant Theology, where I have much to learn.
Thank you.
I have been reading my ESV Study Bible today, and have two questions:
1. Does the Reformation Study Bible take a Sabbatarian stance, as opposed to the ESV Study Bible's anti-Sabbatarian stance? See note on Romans 14:5; notes for Romans by anti-Sabbatarian (I believe) Thomas Schreiner.
2. Does the Reformation SB take a decidedly covenantal stance, as opposed to the ESVSB's propensity to not take a stance at all on many issues, which then leaves the reader to interpret further?
I am finding the ESVSB to be troublesome when it leaves it up to the reader to interpret particular doctrines. It offers multiple views on some things, but doesn't say which is the truth. Useful for some people perhaps, but I would prefer an intentionally Reformed study Bible.
This is particularly frustrating in the area of covenantal vs New Covenant Theology, where I have much to learn.
Thank you.