Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He went to paradise. Abrahams Bosum during that time...
Our salvation resulted from Him taking our sins at the Cross, and His resurrection...
Question 37. What dost thou understand by the words, "He suffered"?
Answer: That he, all the time that he lived on earth, but especially at the end of his life, sustained in body and soul, the wrath of God against the sins of all mankind: (a) that so by his passion, as the only propitiatory sacrifice, (b) he might redeem our body and soul from everlasting damnation, (c) and obtain for us the favour of God, righteousness and eternal life. (d)
Jesus became the Sin Bearer for our sakes, and when the fullness of sin was "dumped" on Him at the Cross, For that brief period of time, for THE only time, the Father had to break hIS ETERNAL FELLOESHIPWITH THE Son...
This is a great mystery, that really we cannot fully understand at this time...
Jesus became the Sin Bearer for our sakes, and when the fullness of sin was "dumped" on Him at the Cross, For that brief period of time, for THE only time, the Father had to break hIS ETERNAL FELLOESHIPWITH THE Son...
This is a great mystery, that really we cannot fully understand at this time...
"Breaking eternal fellowship" is an infelicitous way of describing the situation as it may lead to many misunderstandings related to the incarnation. Gill is perhaps more helpful:
"When He is said to be "forsaken" of God; the meaning is not, that the hypostatic union was dissolved, which was not even by death itself; the fullness of the Godhead still dwelt bodily in him: nor was Christ separated from the love of God; He had the same interest in his Father's heart and favor, both as his Son, and as mediator, as ever: nor was the principle and habit of joy and comfort lost in his soul, as man, but Christ was now without a sense of the gracious presence of God, and was filled, as the surety of his people, with a sense of divine wrath, which their iniquities Christ now bore, deserved, and which was necessary for Him to endure, in order to make full satisfaction for them; for one part of the punishment of sin is loss of the divine presence. "
I did have a follow up question in connection with the above: in what way/how/chronologically did Jesus' take the full wrath of God? I see above where, from Kaleb's helpful post, he said "Jesus war against the forces of hell came through the abandonment of his disciples; his rejection by the scribes and Pharisees; his false arrest and illegal trial; his mocking and ultimately his crucifixion, where after all this from the world and the devil, God himself rejected and crushed him" but I cant help but not seeing how those (seemingly) very temporal things that Jesus faced (abandonment of disciples, rejection by religious elite, etc.) atoned for billions of sinners' eternity of torment?
I would assume the atonement/wrath was at the point that God had "forsaken" Jesus, but what then was the moment of Jesus' being forsaken, and the main question (as above), what was the nature of God forsaking Jesus?
---Hmm Im not sure why you would have jumped to that conclusionI did have a follow up question in connection with the above: in what way/how/chronologically did Jesus' take the full wrath of God? I see above where, from Kaleb's helpful post, he said "Jesus war against the forces of hell came through the abandonment of his disciples; his rejection by the scribes and Pharisees; his false arrest and illegal trial; his mocking and ultimately his crucifixion, where after all this from the world and the devil, God himself rejected and crushed him" but I cant help but not seeing how those (seemingly) very temporal things that Jesus faced (abandonment of disciples, rejection by religious elite, etc.) atoned for billions of sinners' eternity of torment?
I would assume the atonement/wrath was at the point that God had "forsaken" Jesus, but what then was the moment of Jesus' being forsaken, and the main question (as above), what was the nature of God forsaking Jesus?
As for "temporal things," I sincerely pray you do not despise the instruments God has chosen to show forth the greatness of his mercy. He made the frail life of his Son to suffice for the sin of the world.
How could temporal things/punishments that exist in time have been in any way atoning for the worlds eternal punishment? Indeed I believe that all these things played a role in the atonement, but I would think that it was based in the fact that somehow, in some way, there was a serious amount of punishment inflicted upon Jesus that I could know nothing about - I dont doubt that Jesus friends abandoning him was torture, and I dont doubt that his being physically tortured wasnt a horrific instance, but those are things that other humans have the capability of facing, therefore it either must be that when he faced these temporal things they were in some way on a divine level (and felt/experienced in a divine capacity) OR there is something else that we really see "wow, that is an incredible weigh to bear that only God-man/Jesus could have survived... I really think it is rooted in, as you said, the "hour of darkness's power (Lk.22:53)" as the moment where the unbearable was born by the incarnate God... Thoughts?
How could temporal things/punishments that exist in time have been in any way atoning for the worlds eternal punishment? Indeed I believe that all these things played a role in the atonement, but I would think that it was based in the fact that somehow, in some way, there was a serious amount of punishment inflicted upon Jesus that I could know nothing about - I dont doubt that Jesus friends abandoning him was torture, and I dont doubt that his being physically tortured wasnt a horrific instance, but those are things that other humans have the capability of facing, therefore it either must be that when he faced these temporal things they were in some way on a divine level (and felt/experienced in a divine capacity) OR there is something else that we really see "wow, that is an incredible weigh to bear that only God-man/Jesus could have survived... I really think it is rooted in, as you said, the "hour of darkness's power (Lk.22:53)" as the moment where the unbearable was born by the incarnate God... Thoughts?
OK. My concern is that you should not take the Savior's temporal sufferings, putting them in a category sealed off from the Lord's atonement. As if, the only meaningful portion of his grief (Is.53:10) is that which he bore spiritually. As if the torments he endured in the body, in his flesh, in his psychology--these things were only incidental to the atonement. The wicked are promised their own resurrection-unto-dishonor, why? Because their eternal punishment will take place in both their bodies and their souls. If the judgment of God is against the full person, a body and soul unity, then it had to be the case that our Lord and Savior suffered our punishment, body and soul, in our stead.
You wondered how I jumped to a conclusion.... Well, it was not a conclusion, but a fear. My prayer was/is that you will not press your doubts expressed (if I may condense the thought), How could limited, temporal sufferings suffice for neverending misery that is fitting, when that seems impossible and unreasonable? You are correct to surmise there is MORE to what we see than meets the eye, when we encounter our Lord upon his cross. Much, much more. The infinite wrath of God is present; but also, the Savior's infinite divinity is present in hypostatic union with his humanity. And because of that infinite power, Christ is equal to the task.
It is not the excess of his pain, or how long it is drawn out, or any other quantifiable measure of Jesus' miseries of this life which render them of any value, let alone infinite value. It is WHO he is. He did not deserve to "strike his foot against a stone," to stub his toe in other words. And he goes through far more than that. All we need to acknowledge is that it was enough. Enough to prove he has shared in our bodily suffering; and all the way unto death.
Yes, there have been people, any one of which for whom an argument could be made: he endured more physical agonies or greater psychological degradation on the way to his death. But in the end, that is our own subjective and psychological projection of a comparison. We actually have no good standard of comparison, because none of us have ever been sinless.
Think for just a moment of some scarred person, wounded tremendously, but still alive years later but always in pain. And finally, he succumbs to the effect of his injury. There are people today who boldly declare: "My private hell-on-earth is all the suffering I would ever need, and more. I did not deserve this. God owes me now." Such attitudes are not uncommon, even with some who have had comparatively comfortable lives. Jesus' great trial lasted "only" a few hours. Or "only" a few years. "Only 33yrs." Yet, without repentance, the suffering of this life is but a hint of eternal woe.
On the other hand, so excellent was Christ's person, and the satisfaction of "only 33yrs" or "only" his final 24hrs; that those temporal sufferings combined with his soul's endurance of the unmitigated wrath of God are regarded by God as sufficient. For not one other, or a handful of people; but for all the sins of all the elect from the beginning to the end of this age. There's something special about Jesus. And there's nothing special about any of the rest of us.
We're not in any position to test the measure of Jesus' temporal or his spiritual agonies. But we dare not relegate anything he bore in our place to the condition of a mere sign, something only indicative of his divine capacity. He suffered and died as a MAN. But one minuscule fraction of the pains that Man felt in his jangling nerves and psychic pathways is worth more than a lifetime of your pains or mine, be they 2yrs, 20yrs, 100yrs, or 969yrs. Because he was unique.