Question about the Sabbath for those holding to the Westminster Standards

Status
Not open for further replies.

MichaelNZ

Puritan Board Freshman
After seeing the discussion about the Super Bowl and the Sabbath, and the objections thereof to those upholding the Westminster Confession of Faith, I have a question for those people who attend a church that holds primarily to the Westminster Confession.

As per Chapter XXI, Paragraph VIII of the Westminster Confession, do you spend every single moment of Sunday engaged in the worship of God, reading Christian books, watching Christian videos, discussing the Christian faith (I mean apart from time spent eating, sleeping, preparing food etc)? Would you ever, say, read a novel or watch a secular TV programme at any time on Sunday?

While my church does affirm the Westminster Confession (in addition to the Three Forms of Unity), our pastor has told me that Christ is our Sabbath rest and he doesn't seem at all legalistic with Sabbath keeping. He has mentioned that the Sabbath is supposed to be a delight.
 
True it is that the Sabbath is a delight, but it is delight in Christ and the things of Christ.
It is a tithe of one in seven to the Lord, and for our spiritual improvement and comfort.

Henry Martyn's wrote that,"we may judge by our attitude to the Sabbath whether eternity
will be forced upon us." All secular activities are unnecessary as they are eclipse by more
solid joys and lasting pleasures. The things that are seen are temporal, but the things that are unseen
are eternal. One of my own country men wrote,"every Lord's day is the true Christian's Easter day."
It is a rest for the soul and the opportunity to put aside all other hindrances that prevent a closer
communion with our Lord. Someone wrote,"the decline in religion is noted by the manner of spending
the Sabbath,especially in conversation before and after the preaching." Forgive another quotation but
itis apposite, written by Swinnock,"on other days God feeds us, on the Sabbath he feasts us."
 
Do you keep the other 9 commandments perfectly? Or do you only expect perfection from those who love the 4th Commandment?

Your pastor is quoting from Isaiah 58. Please read it -

13 - “If you turn away your foot from the Sabbath,
From doing your pleasure on My holy day,
And call the Sabbath a delight,
The holy day of the Lord honorable,
And shall honor Him, not doing your own ways,
Nor finding your own pleasure,
Nor speaking your own words,

14 - Then you shall delight yourself in the Lord;
And I will cause you to ride on the high hills of the earth,
And feed you with the heritage of Jacob your father.
The mouth of the Lord has spoken.”

You will have to do some homework in order to show us why you consider turning all thoughts towards God on the Sabbath "legalism" and yet "not looking at a woman with lust" is not legalism?

What does it mean when God tells you in the 4th Commandment to keep the day "holy"? Where in the New Testament is this idea repealed? My question is - why do you want to spend time doing anything else? By the time the Lords Day is over I always feel like the day is too short. There's more I could have done - more I could have read. More time I could have spent with God's People. More time I could have spent in prayer. More time I could have spent discussing the Word with my family. One thing I have yet to spend time on are deeds of mercy. We are challenged in this in the church. Yet here's a day to take care of widows, the poor and orphans.

Why would I want to watch movies and read novels in comparison to that?
 
I also find it curious that people say "their rest is in Christ", yet use that to excuse breaking the 4th Commandment to spend time apart from Him.

Jesus is present in the means of grace and communion with the body of Christ. Not in secular TV shows and books.

Interestingly enough He also promises that which is done to the "least of these" is done to Him as well, giving us an interesting view on deeds of mercy.

Christ is present so richly in the Sabbath Day, and yet some who claim to have rest in Him wish to flee from Him and run back to the World. The irony is pretty rich.
 
I also find it curious that people say "their rest is in Christ", yet use that to excuse breaking the 4th Commandment to spend time apart from Him.

Jesus is present in the means of grace and communion with the body of Christ. Not in secular TV shows and books.

Interestingly enough He also promises that which is done to the "least of these" is done to Him as well, giving us an interesting view on deeds of mercy.

Christ is present so richly in the Sabbath Day, and yet some who claim to have rest in Him wish to flee from Him and run back to the World. The irony is pretty rich.

I have often heard the "rest in Christ" argument from fellow Baptists. I think they are mainly getting this from Hebrews 3-4, but I think it is pretty clear in those passages that the ultimate rest being spoken of is a future rest that will take place in heaven, and not one that we are already fully entered into.
 
As per Chapter XXI, Paragraph VIII of the Westminster Confession, do you spend every single moment of Sunday engaged in the worship of God, reading Christian books, watching Christian videos, discussing the Christian faith (I mean apart from time spent eating, sleeping, preparing food etc)?
On a given Lord's day, we listen to between 2 and 4 sermons, attend service, and I read to the Children. Currently Manual of Christian Doctrine. We sing Psalms, catechize and discuss the doctrine and word received that day. No we do not keep the Sabbath perfectly. However, we do delight in the Lord and his Word, and worshipping him with our Church, and as a family when at home.

Would you ever, say, read a novel or watch a secular TV programme at any time on Sunday?
No. We are given a full day to rest from these things. While these are permissible on 6 other days, they are not on this day. It would be foolish in my mind, to waste the day on the things of this world, when we are given this day to turn our hearts and minds to the things of God. The world is in my face 313 days a year. The Lord has given me 52 days of rest from that. If I did have a television, I would not allow it to be turned on in a Lord's day. Why train my children that the world has something to offer that is more desirable than the things of the Lord on his Day? This is no Legalism. This is accepting what the Lord has given, and recognizing that we are due him 1 full day in 7. We have a duty to the Lord, it is especially unique duty on the Sabbath.

I heard an illustration once. One who carried 7 gold coins came upon a destitute man. He gave 6 of his coins to the man of destitute. However the man who received the coins took it upon himself to overcome the giver of 6 to take the 7th also unto himself. What would we say of this action?
 
The fourth commandment is as moral as the other nine and we are bound to follow it as strictly as the Jews did, apart from the ceremonial differences where they were more burdened such as the labor involved in the sacrifices etc. On the other hand, what the Scripture proofs for acts of necessity and mercy show (the disciples eating grain-heads in the field walking along on the Lord's day from one place to the next and Christ's appeal to David eating the shewbread; and Christ's healing on the Lord's day) is that while we are as strictly to follow this commandment as the Jews, they were no less free when it came to acts of necessity and mercy.
 
He has mentioned that the Sabbath is supposed to be a delight.

Indeed. And sometimes our focus is completely negative, as in focusing on the things we are not supposed to do. I call this "guardrail thinking," as in driving a car by looking only at guardrails rather than looking down the road. You are not going to enjoy the drive, for sure.

Maybe a lesser to the greater analogy might help: Let's say your wife's birthday is today and you have promised to enjoy it with her in her company. There are at least two approaches you can follow for the day:

1. Make a list of all the things you promise not to do, and spend most of the day scrupulously avoiding doing those things ("I won't go out for beer with my buddies today, I won't spend all day on the golf course, I won't do this...I won't do that...").

2. Focus on being together, learning more about your wife, what she likes, spending time communicating.

Which is approach is more likely to lead to "delight"?

Likewise on the Lord's Day. We can make lists of all the things we shouldn't do and go over them meticulously and constantly, and miss the delight.

Or we can commune with our Lord by reading his Word, prayer, meditation, quiet fellowship, etc. For me, sometimes sitting in a chair reading a Psalm and drifting off to a nap for a half hour is a delight beyond any thing else.

Focus on the blessings and the means of grace and everything else seems to flow without much effort at all. The yoke is easy, the burden is light.
 
All of life is a form of worship

Maybe so, but I don't see how it relates to the topic of the 4th Commandment.

I reflect on that by saying that all my living is worship, for sure, and apart from Christ's work and apart from hearing his voice on the matter, my living worship is rebellion.
 
I would deny that time I spend reading a newspaper, or a novel, or talking to a friend about a movie, or jogging, is time "spent apart from Him." I dare say I don't spend any time "apart from Him." To characterize all thought/activity into either or a secular or sacred sphere seems wrong to me.
 
The thing is, Michael, when I read what brothers like Rom, Chris, Jeff, Victor and others are writing, I don't hear "legalism." I hear men delighting in the Lord and His Christ and all the gracious provisions that are ours in Him.

I grant, as I did on the sister thread to this, that this whole matter can be treated in a Pharisaical way that can make the Sabbath oppresive. Victor and others have acknowledged such and eschewed such an approach.

In fact, it is the world, the flesh, and the devil that oppress us. I realize that we are to die to them at all times, but we do give way, sadly, and the Lord provides time in daily secret and private prayer as respites from such, and the Lord's Day in particular as a day of public, private, and secret rest. The Lord and His day are not the oppressors, and don't let the real oppressor paint them as such.

I hope that you can come to hear a positive, delightful treatment of this day of days for what it is and not mistake it for imposing burdens, but as the day in which burdens are particularly lifted.

Peace,
Alan
 
I would deny that time I spend reading a newspaper, or a novel, or talking to a friend about a movie, or jogging, is time "spent apart from Him." I dare say I don't spend any time "apart from Him." To characterize all thought/activity into either or a secular or sacred sphere seems wrong to me.

Sure, God is present everywhere, David says as much - he also says that God is present in Sheol. That wasn't the point I was trying to make though.

The Question is - where are your thoughts - do they rest on Him? Are you spending quality time with your Heavenly Father? Those of us who are married or have children know we can spend time with them in our living room, but still ignore them. How many wives plead with us to spend "quality time" with the family? This is what I'm trying to express (poorly, no doubt).

We know that God's blesses the Means of Grace - by putting His stamp on them. Christ is present in the Word of God in a way that He isn't in talking to your friend about The Avengers. So in a real sense, our theology teaches us that some things are set apart. The Means of Grace, and the Lord's Day are set apart. Many ministers speak of this when blessing the elements of the Lord's Supper, saying that the ordinary (bread, wine) have been set apart from an ordinary use to a sacramental use.

Talking to your friend about her spiritual walk, her physical needs, and sharpening each other is something however that is wonderful on the Lord's Day. But note how we tend to gravitate towards that which is temporal and not that which is eternal? As many have expressed - the Sabbath Day is a training vehicle to prepare us for eternity. Can we put away temporal things for a single day of the week and focus on the eternal? How will we enjoy eternal life?

Are there not six other days of the week to spend discussing novels, and movies? 85% of the week (rounding down) can be spent in these pursuits. 15% (rounding up) of the week the Lord has set apart particularly for Himself. How gracious is our Lord!

The parable that Benjamin gives is a good one.
 
Last edited:
Are there not six other days of the week to spend discussing novels, and movies? 85% of the week (rounding down) can be spent in these pursuits. 15% (rounding up) of the week the Lord has set apart particularly for Himself. How gracious is our Lord!
A "tithe" of the week was also mentioned in Jeff's (Cymro, post #2) post. As a new covenant minister I'm not an advocate of strict tithing, by any means. But I suppose it is possible to see an even closer (i.e. "more exact") sense in which the Lord's Day is his "tithe."

Consider how 1/3 of even the Lord's day is already consumed by us (somewhat of necessity) in sleep. If we assume 8hrs (1/3 of 24hrs) is given up to our own demands, and if we consider there are 21 such divisions during the week, God urges (or commands, let's not soften it...) our remembrance of slightly less than 10% of the time (2 portions, 16hrs) he has provided to us in a given week mostly (+90%) to do with what we will.

Again, I'm actually among them who oppose teaching even a "voluntary evangelical tax" (the divine-legal Tithe). So, I don't think this is a "good argument" for promoting the enforcement of such compulsion of conscience. But it is an observation consistent with certain exacting demands of the old (Mosaic) covenant.

Chris's (Naphtali Press, post #8) is quite good, in describing how the Jews then, and we today, are to strictly keep our Sabbaths--less by noting the specific limits on our preferences; more by admiring the grace of God and demonstrating it in the opportunity. Jesus clarifies; he does not set aside the truth of the Sabbath.
 
I once went to a Church and on a particular day the regular Preacher wasn't there. We were told he was not here today as there was a big market on and he was there as it was a good opportunity to sell some of his furniture that he makes! Needless to say we left that church.
 
I am not referring so much to the concept of "God is everywhere," which of course I acknowledge.

I refer more to the Christian philosophy, the Biblical philosophy, that whether I eat, or drink, or whatever I do, do it all to the glory of God. The concept of a consecrated life.

Now, that would exclude sinning. I can't murder to the glory of God.

But I would take the position of denying that I am less close to God, necessarily, when I am doing the dishes or making coffee or doing my taxes. I don't see a sacred/secular distinction prescribed in the Christian life.
 
To elaborate, may I respond to:

"Are there not six other days of the week to spend discussing novels, and movies? 85% of the week (rounding down) can be spent in these pursuits. 15% (rounding up) of the week the Lord has set apart particularly for Himself. How gracious is our Lord!"

Yes, there are six other days. But I don't discuss them in a secular way any day of the week. Whether I am discussing a novel or a movie, washing my hair, or walking the dog, I am not living a secular life.

My point is NOT that watching the Super Bowl all day on Sunday instead of attending to the divinely appointed means of grace of worship is ok. If God commands or forbids an activity, His word should be adhered to, or I am sinning, and in that case am NOT closer to God.

My point is that I am not necessarily less close to God when teaching my daughter a math lesson than when I am reading the Bible. I don't see my life as divided between secular and sacred activities, and I am not convinced that I should. My whole life as a Christian is sacred; unless I am sinning at a given point. At least that's the best I understand how it should be.
 
After seeing the discussion about the Super Bowl and the Sabbath, and the objections thereof to those upholding the Westminster Confession of Faith, I have a question for those people who attend a church that holds primarily to the Westminster Confession.

As per Chapter XXI, Paragraph VIII of the Westminster Confession, do you spend every single moment of Sunday engaged in the worship of God, reading Christian books, watching Christian videos, discussing the Christian faith (I mean apart from time spent eating, sleeping, preparing food etc)? Would you ever, say, read a novel or watch a secular TV programme at any time on Sunday?

While my church does affirm the Westminster Confession (in addition to the Three Forms of Unity), our pastor has told me that Christ is our Sabbath rest and he doesn't seem at all legalistic with Sabbath keeping. He has mentioned that the Sabbath is supposed to be a delight.

We do rest in Christ by faith and He has fully entered into His Father's and our Fathers' rest. But we ourselves have not yet entered that rest, except in principle by faith in Christ.

Therefore - as the writer to the Hebrews says - there remains the keeping of a Sabbath Day unto the New Testament people of God, For the One that is entered into His rest, He also has ceased from His own works, as God did from His.

We will never cease from the fight with the world, the flesh and the Devil, from the tasks of the Great Commission and Creation Mandate until we enter that place that is characterised by rest and worship.

Thetefore we have not reached the Sabbatical antitype, and the type remains for us until death, and for the world until the Eschaton.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2
 
To elaborate, may I respond to:

"Are there not six other days of the week to spend discussing novels, and movies? 85% of the week (rounding down) can be spent in these pursuits. 15% (rounding up) of the week the Lord has set apart particularly for Himself. How gracious is our Lord!"

Yes, there are six other days. But I don't discuss them in a secular way any day of the week. Whether I am discussing a novel or a movie, washing my hair, or walking the dog, I am not living a secular life.

My point is NOT that watching the Super Bowl all day on Sunday instead of attending to the divinely appointed means of grace of worship is ok. If God commands or forbids an activity, His word should be adhered to, or I am sinning, and in that case am NOT closer to God.

My point is that I am not necessarily less close to God when teaching my daughter a math lesson than when I am reading the Bible. I don't see my life as divided between secular and sacred activities, and I am not convinced that I should. My whole life as a Christian is sacred; unless I am sinning at a given point. At least that's the best I understand how it should be.

You need to read John Murray on specific and generic worship. If this distinction is broken down we could make walking the dog , teaching maths or doing the ironing part of the Lord's Day worship services.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2
 
That Murray distinction that Richard cited is vital. I agree with Miss Marple that we are indeed to worship whatever we are doing, because life is religion. I wholeheartedly affirm that, but also the regulative principle, which defines worship. In life, what the Bible does not forbid (either explicitly or impliedly), we may do. The opposite is true for worship: as for elements, we are to do only what is commanded.

I like to put it this way sometimes: I am to worship if I am watching a baseball game (generic; not on the Sabbath we assume!), but I don't play a game of baseball in public worship (specific and regulated by the Word). So I worship while shining my shoes, but I don't shine my shoes in public worship. This is the kind of simple distinction for which we are arguing.

Peace,
Alan
 
(sigh) I did not say that we can make walking the dog, teaching maths or doing ironing a part of public worship. I just said that I don't think I am necessarily farther from God when I do these or any other non-sinful activities. I guess I am not making myself clear but it does seem Dr. Strange understood my point :)
 
After seeing the discussion about the Super Bowl and the Sabbath, and the objections thereof to those upholding the Westminster Confession of Faith, I have a question for those people who attend a church that holds primarily to the Westminster Confession.

As per Chapter XXI, Paragraph VIII of the Westminster Confession, do you spend every single moment of Sunday engaged in the worship of God, reading Christian books, watching Christian videos, discussing the Christian faith (I mean apart from time spent eating, sleeping, preparing food etc)? Would you ever, say, read a novel or watch a secular TV programme at any time on Sunday?

While my church does affirm the Westminster Confession (in addition to the Three Forms of Unity), our pastor has told me that Christ is our Sabbath rest and he doesn't seem at all legalistic with Sabbath keeping. He has mentioned that the Sabbath is supposed to be a delight.

May I commend this excellent sermon series on the Sabbath to you...I think it will answer many of your questions.

The Sabbath Day - by Rev Mark Koller
 
Thanks for all the replies.

I would like to add that my church was founded by those of the Dutch Reformed tradition and a significant portion of our members are either Dutch of of Dutch descent. They seem to have a less 'restrictive' (I won't use the term 'legalistic') view of the Sabbath than most of the people on this board. We don't even use that term - instead we call it the 'Lord's Day'. Is that significant? Our pastor (who studied at Mid-America Reformed Seminary) told me that it is okay to go for a walk on the Lord's Day.

I have seen members of our church go to the supermarket or buy food from a takeout shop on the Lord's Day. I know that views of working on the Sabbath can be taken to the extreme that the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland takes them. I was told by a member of our church who was involved with them that they believe it is a sin to take public transport to church on the Sabbath (presumably because the driver is working).

You may not consider the situations above 'legalistic', but I have obsessive-compulsive disorder and have a real problem with legalism and determining if something is a sin or not. So I do tend to focus on the things I can't do on that day. When I've asked my pastor about the Lord's Day he said it is primarily to glorify God.

I personally would observe the Lord's Day more strictly if I was living with other Christians or with a Christian wife. I think there is merit in setting one day aside to worship God and I wouldn't take a job that required me to work on the Lord's Day unless it was something in the medical field that would be a valid exception.

I'll have a listen to the sermon series on the Lord's Day. Thanks for recommending it.
 
I just want to address the driver situation - with public transportation. I think that before we start talking about people as 'extremist' or 'legalistic', we have to understand the heart of why people have an issue of conscience regarding such things.

The reason someone will have a problem with having others work for you on the Lord's Day, is that it keeps that other person away from the means of grace.

Paul tells us that faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. If our employment of another keeps them from church (I have talked with some folks who tell me that they'd love to come to church sometime, but they have to work) then we are keeping them from hearing the gospel.

That is breaking Jesus' command to "love your neighbor as yourself".

This is why in Exodus 20:10 - "In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates."

This is particularly poignant when the Ten Commandments are repeated in Deuteronomy. Look at Deut. 5:14,15 -
"...nor your stranger who is within your gates, that your male servant and your female servant may rest as well as you. 15 And remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the LORD your God brought you out from there by a mighty hand and by an outstretched arm; therefore the LORD your God commanded you to keep the Sabbath day."

This is important, because we too used to be slaves, spiritually speaking - and were liberated by our mighty God, and entered into spiritual rest. We desire that the strangers to the promise of God would come hear the gospel, and enter into that same rest! We are committed that no such barrier should be placed by us by worldly employments.

So please, brother - I encourage you to consider that rather than being 'extremists', these brothers and sisters who might seem odd to you, may have a real heart for the lost, and those outside of the visible church.
 
Michael:

Thanks for sharing more about yourself and your situation in #25 (and my warmest greetings to your dear Pastor, Rev. Stolte, whom I helped train at Mid-America).

Your mention of a walk on the Lord's Day is quite instructive. No one in this discussion, of whom I am aware, has said anything to the contrary. I think it quite important that we catch the meaning of the WCF in its prohibition of "recreations" (noting the plural) as a term of art connected with the Book of Sports and not a broad prohibition of anything that anyone might suppose is such. For example, there is no prohibition of fellowship with friends around a meal or taking a refreshing walk between services or the like. That is not what we're talking about with the prohibition of "recreations." We are talking about organized games, which were held in place of what would have been afternoon services were the Puritans permitted to have them (the Stuarts thought one service per Lord's Day, and the use not only of the Prayer Book but the Book of Homilies, was best).

Michael, I am not even suggesting that all on this Board agree in all the details of application of the Lord's Day. I've seen enough to know that we don't. Some may regard that as disturbing. I don't. We can differ on some of the applications, but it is true that the WCF teaches that the Day is His in a way that we refrain from things that we lawfully do the rest of the week (except for duties of necessity and mercy--again we'll differ in some particulars here), laying aside such to engage more pointedly in the worship of our God.

I always say to God's people, why don't we think more about how we can bring the blessings of this one Day, that is particularly His, into the other six days of the week, rather than bringing what pertains to those days into this Day? Why not challenge a priority for Him in the other six days than for ourselves on this one Day that is His? Think about it. And every blessing on this wonderful Day!

Peace,
Alan
 
(sigh) I did not say that we can make walking the dog, teaching maths or doing ironing a part of public worship. I just said that I don't think I am necessarily farther from God when I do these or any other non-sinful activities. I guess I am not making myself clear but it does seem Dr. Strange understood my point :)

Sorry if I took you up wrongly.

It is right that we seek to do all things to God's glory, but, as you know, essential distinctions are made in and drawn by good and necessary consequence from Scripture between what we can do to God's glory on the Lord's Day via-a-vis the other six days, what we can do in worship via-a-vis what we can do in non-worship, and what we can do in public worship via-a-vis private worship.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2
 
I like Alan’s statement focusing on propriety. It reminds me of Calvin, where we are to bring the experience of the Lord’s day into the rest of the week, and not vice versa. As he is cited by Nicholas Bownd at various points:
When it is said, Thou shalt labor six days, our Lord would hereby signify unto us, that we ought not to complain of yielding unto Him one certain day, when He leaves unto us six for one. As if He did say, “Shall the cost and charge be great unto you, to choose one day which may be wholly given to My service? that you do no other thing in it, but read and exercise yourselves in My law, or hear My doctrine which shall be preached unto you; a day to come to the temple to the end you may there be confirmed by the sacrifices which are there made; a day to call upon My name, to declare and protest that |237| you are of the number and company of My people. Ought this to be grievous and troublesome unto you, seeing you have six days free to traffic and to do your business in? When I use such gentleness towards you, that I demand but one day of seven, is not this an over great unthankfulness on your part, if you complain of this time as being evil employed? if you be such covetous and niggardly wretches, as not to spare Me one seventh part of the time? I have given you your whole life, wheresoever the sun shines upon you; you ought to acknowledge My goodness, and how that I am a liberal Father towards you. For this sun which I make to shine is to give you a means to go and walk by, to the end that every one may do his business. And yet for all this, why is it that I shall not have one day among seven in which every one should withdraw himself from his travail and labor? that you be not wrapped in the care of the world, and so have no care to think on Me?” Now then we see that this sentence of travailing the six days is not placed as a commandment, but is rather a permission which God gives, and that to reproach the unthankfulness of men, if they observe not the Sabbath day, and sanctify it in such sort as we have spoken…. So then when men shall have well considered of this thing, they shall be convinced that God bears with them as a Father, which should show himself pitiful to His children. And therefore let us take diligent heed that we be not ungrateful, but be provoked and allured to serve our God so much the more, seeing He commands us not those things which might seem over bitter and painful unto us, but has a due regard to our power and ability. Therefore when He bears with us after this manner, and leaves unto us our profits and commodities, so much more dissolute, wicked, and inexcusable are we, if we are not inflamed to yield ourselves wholly unto Him. (Calvin, Deut. 5, Sermon 35. [Ten Commandments, 39r–39v, 40r. Sermons upon Deuteronomie, 206, 207]).

Let us know that it is not sufficient that we come to the sermon on the Sunday to receive some good doctrine, and to call upon the name of God; but we must digest those things, and that by this means we are so formed and fashioned to the thing, that all the rest of the week cost us nothing to aspire to our God, and that we need but to call to our mind, that which we shall have learned before, at good leisure, when our minds were (as it were) unwrapped from all those things which hinder us to recount the word, and works of God. (Calvin, Deut. 5, Sermon 34. [“…fashioned to this thing, that the Monday, and all the rest of the week beside, cost us….” Ten Commandments, 36v–37r. Cf. Sermons on Deuteronomie, 204]).

Although God nourishes us every day, yet notwithstanding we meditate not sufficiently on His goodness, to magnify Him for it. True it is that this should be but a poor thing, if we should consider of the benefits of God, but on the Sunday; but on the other days, because we are occupied overmuch about our worldly affairs, we are not so given to God, as on that day, which is altogether dedicated unto this. The Sunday therefore ought to serve us for a tower to mount on high to view the works of God from afar, when we are neither hindered nor occupied with anything, but that we may apply all our senses and our whole understanding to reknowledge [acknowledge] the gracious gifts and benefits which He has bestowed on us. And when we shall have practiced this on the Sunday, namely, shall have deeply considered of the works of God, it is certain that all the rest of our time should be given hereunto, and that this meditation shall so fashion and polish us, that all the rest of the week we shall be led to thank our God, when so beforehand we shall have premeditated on His works to make our profit therein. (ibid.).

When the Sunday is spent, not only in games and pastimes full of vanity, but in things which are altogether contrary unto God, that men think they have not celebrated Sunday, except God therein be by many and sundry ways offended; when men, I say, unhallow in such sort this holy day, which God has instituted to lead us unto Himself, is it any marvel if we become brutish, and beastly in our doings all the rest of the week? (Ibid., 36v, 204).

Who glut themselves by rioting, and are shut up in their houses, because they dare not show a manifest contempt of their duty in the open streets; so that the Sunday is to them a retreat, to withdraw themselves from the congregation of God; whereby one may see what affection they have to all Christianity and the service of God, when by this, which was given us for an aid and help to draw nearer unto God, they take occasion to withdraw themselves the further from Him. (Ibid., 36v, 204).

“For if we employ the Sunday to make good cheer, to sport ourselves, to go to games and pastimes, shall God in this be honored? Is not this a mockery? Is not this an unhallowing of His name?” (Ibid., 36r, 204).
 
I once went to a Church and on a particular day the regular Preacher wasn't there. We were told he was not here today as there was a big market on and he was there as it was a good opportunity to sell some of his furniture that he makes! Needless to say we left that church.

Excellent decision to leave a church where the Minister dare I say desecrated the Lord's day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top