The "mid-service mint" at Dutch congregations

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tim

Puritan Board Graduate
Late last year, I attended worship at a theologically and ethnically Dutch Reformed church. To my amazement, midway through the worship service, I heard the crinkly sound of hundreds of breath mints and hard candies being opened simultaneously. I later learned that this is common in Dutch congregations.

What a curious tradition! Please explain if you can!
 
Sweeties are eaten in conservative Scottish Presbyterian congregations too, but people usually discreetly slip them into their mouths. I have heard of rare cases where individuals noisily chomp through a whole bag of cream-lined toffees during the sermon, disturbing the concentration of those in front of them.:)
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2
 
Not all at the same time in some kind of "ritual", but a few will take a sweetie as the sermon commences.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2
 
2. It's encouraged for folks to do it all at once so as hopefully to create less of a distraction.

Yes. That would be better than something like this:

[video=youtube;VZMgP2ai79Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZMgP2ai79Q[/video]
 
When I was growing up in the CRC, it was common in many of the more Dutch churches we visited for families to discretly pass around a roll of mints just as the sermon was getting started. They were Dutch-made mints, of course. It was NOT announced from the pulpit as a part of the service or anything, and I don't recall it making much noise, but most families would do it. I was told it was to help you pay attention (as Josh speculated); but as a child, I just appreciated getting candy. It felt more like it was a pleasant little Dutch tradition than like it was done out of piety.

I recall reading a criticism of the practice a few years back. Some Reformed purist complained that Scripture doesn't authorize candy-eating as part of worship. But in my experience, it was never treated as an element of the service nor was it officially encouraged to be done in any particular fashion. It was just something you as a worshiper knew you were going to do at some point, and by common custom it was accomplished at an opportune and discrete moment, like blowing your nose.
 
Last edited:
Generally speaking, as Rev. Kok could testify, what are generally taken are Wilhelmina or King mints. These are taken just before the sermon, not in the earlier part of the service. This is why they are, as Tim noted, "mid-service."

And it is indeed, as Josh noted, to help the pew-sitters maintain alertness during the preaching. Sermons are sometimes referred to as two-mint, or in rare cases, three-mint sermons. It is not considered part of the liturgy as such and thus not listed ("The Taking of the Mint"). It is not considered an element of worship but perhaps a circumstance.

Rev. Kok, you should realize that duelling has been outlawed here in the States (perhaps a surprise to any Canadian!). Nonetheless, if Perg takes up your challenge and chooses something like "theological puns at twenty feet," I may be willing to serve, if you wish, as your second!

Peace,
Alan
 
Some of those dutch "Drops" are very nasty tasting (like black licorice)...

Some of those can be nasty at first, though they're quite a treat once you acquire the taste. But they're not to be confused with the sermon-time mint, which is pure sugar and peppermint. You'd like it.
 
Generally speaking, as Rev. Kok could testify, what are generally taken are Wilhelmina or King mints. These are taken just before the sermon, not in the earlier part of the service. This is why they are, as Tim noted, "mid-service."

And it is indeed, as Josh noted, to help the pew-sitters maintain alertness during the preaching. Sermons are sometimes referred to as two-mint, or in rare cases, three-mint sermons. It is not considered part of the liturgy as such and thus not listed ("The Taking of the Mint"). It is not considered an element of worship but perhaps a circumstance.

Rev. Kok, you should realize that duelling has been outlawed here in the States (perhaps a surprise to any Canadian!). Nonetheless, if Perg takes up your challenge and chooses something like "theological puns at twenty feet," I may be willing to serve, if you wish, as your second!

Peace,
Alan

Sadly, due to the influence of the liberalizing tendencies of American evangelicalism, most of our congregations have replaced the traditional mint with jelly beans, caramels and the Jolly Rancher (a favorite of Emergemint Church). Hence the monikers "tolermints" "permissivemints" and "indulgemints."

Please note that there is not only the Taking of the Mint but also the following Receiving of the Mint and, occasionally, the Snatching of the Mint (for those little hands that are quicker than Mom's eye).

Well then, perhaps I will just throw a case of Wilheminas at him.
 
Just don't preach with one- my pastor took a cough drop while preaching once....I wasn't there, but the tale is legend! At least he wasn't preaching on Rev. 3:16!
 
I am amazed at the toleration of such a practice, from within or from without. It is a quirk in the Scottish church
as our brother has confessed. Having been involved for over 40 yrs with the Free Church I am still disconcerted and
annoyed by this interference in public worship. To chew and chomp whilst engaged in divine worship smacks of entertainment
rather than a mode of concentration. Something to be engaged with in front of a television rather than in front of a preacher!
If a congregation has to resort to unwrapping sweets instead of unwrapping the content of the preacher's message, then change the preacher
rather than the make of sweets.
There was a late Minister in the Free church of authoritative presence and used in the salvation of many, when confronted with this aberration
in a morning service, stopped his sermon and upbraided them thus, "you are like a flock of wedders (2yr old sheep), chomping on a trough of tatties."
(potatoes).
The sermon is an integral part of worship and the same reverence is to be afforded it. If we uphold the doctrine of the Purity of Worship, then we ought
to discountenance this unholy intrusion.
Thy testimonies every one
in faithfulness excel;
And holiness for ever ,Lord,
thine house becometh well.
 
My humblest apologies to all lovers of black licorice everywhere.
There's lovers of black licorice anywhere? I thought those were thrown in as a joke, made from the floor sweepings at the candy factory, like getting the rotten peanut.

See, I learn new things everyday on PB!
 
My wife's CRC family has always done this, and I thought it was a family quirk. They were the only ones in the congregation who did it.

Now that I think about it, they haven't done it in a while now that their youngest is 15. Interesting.
 
To chew and chomp whilst engaged in divine worship smacks of entertainment
rather than a mode of concentration.

To be fair to those who take mints... I've never seen it done distractingly nor seen a mint either chewed or chomped. They're sucked, quietly. And in the case of certain otherwise stuffy and self-important worship services (yes, some churches get that way), a peppermint can provide a sweet change of pace at just the right time.
 
If chewing mints will alleviate some folks from the need to prop their often bare feet up on the chair in front, the radiators, or the balcony parapet, I'd be glad to hand them out at the door...
 
To my amazement, midway through the worship service, I heard the crinkly sound of hundreds of breath mints and hard candies being opened simultaneously. I later learned that this is common in Dutch congregations.

It was also very noticeable and present in my experience at a previous church (a SBC church in NC) ... its seems a mint singularity occurs, with the actual loudness of the mint acting inversely proportional to the desired loudness of the unwrap-per-er ... I found peppermints wrapped up in crinkly plastic twist wrap the worst ... of course, an intention to induce a distraction would be bad, but my anecdotal experience was that the congregation was possessed instead of an unreasonably buoyant and forgetful optimism that the next mint would be "different" ... :)

Regards!
 
Last edited:
I went to one church in North Carolina that had places in each pew to spit your chaw. If Dutchies can have their mints, why not rednecks their toe-backer?

I think I'll bring a bag of super-crunchy nacho chips and a Super Big Gulp to my next service. If told to refrain from such practices, I will noticeably yawn and nod off to justify my practice and tell the elders, "I must do this in order to stay alert during your sermons, Pastor." :)
 
Note to self- New Business Idea category: Evident need found for quieter candy/mint wrappers. Could a utility patent be had for such a thing?
 
Perhaps I'm the only one shaking his head about the obvious indictment of an entire tradition's services which are such that people literally need a stimulant to stay awake during the sermon.

Rather than seeing this as a cute cultural tradition, I see it as a horrible necessity brought on by a terrible culture of almost intolerable boringness in the worship: Faced with an ecclesiastical situation they could not change, the faithful found a way to stay awake and try to engage their being in the worship service. Some people love boring and so they eat stimulants to stay awake. Others, well, others leave.
 
Wife was raised in a Dutch/CRC setting. They would take king mints or mentos at start of sermon. We give our girls jelly beans or worms, which are much quieter.

Perg said:
My humblest apologies to all lovers of black licorice everywhere.

Dubbel Zoute licorice should be considered cruel & unusual punishment.
 
Perhaps I'm the only one shaking his head about the obvious indictment of an entire tradition's services which are such that people literally need a stimulant to stay awake during the sermon.

Hi Ben,

I used to think that way, too. Then I got older and started having blood sugar issues ... :(

Kind Regards!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top