Archlute
Puritan Board Senior
Pink in Our Accountability to God :
We by no means share the popular idea that the Lord saved Adam very soon after his fall; rather we take decided exception to that theory. We cannot find anything whatever in Holy Writ on which to base such a belief; in fact, we find much to the contrary. First it is clear that Adam's sin was not one of infirmity, but instead a presumptuous one, pertaining to that class of willful sins and open defiance of God for which no sacrifice was provided (Ex. 21:14; Num. 15:30-31; Deut. 17:12; Heb. 10:26-29), and which was therefore an unpardonable sin. There is not the slightest sing that he ever repented of his sin, nor any record of his confessing it to God. On the contrary, when charged with it, he attempted to excuse and extenuate it. Genesis 3 closes with the awful statement "So he drove out the man." Nothing whatever is mentioned to Adam's credit afterward: no offering of sacrifice, no acts of faith or obedience. Instead we are merely told that he knew his wife (4:1, 25), begat a son in his own likeness, an died (5:3-5). If the reader can see in those statements any intimation or indication that Adam was a regenerated man, then he has much better eyes than the writer - or possibly a more lively imagination.
Nor is there a single word in Adam's favor in later Scriptures, rather is everything to his condemnation.... In the New Testament he is contrasted in considerable detail with Christ (Rom. 5:12-21; I Cor. 15:22, 45-47); and if he were saved, then the antithesis would fail as its principlal point. Moreover, such an anomaly - that the great majority of those whom he represented should eternally perish, while the responsible head should be recovered - is quite out of keeping with what is revealed of God's justice.
I don't agree with Pink here, but I knew I read that some time ago.
This is exactly where I tend to have problems with Pink - he often fails to grasp the profound nature of the application of grace.
