I was introduced to the Amil view with a partial preterist twist. The PP view seemed to answer lots of questions that I had such as: Why did Jesus say "this" generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened? Etc.
Until recently I didn't know that historical Amil allowed for an Antichrist and a tribulation. I learned this from Kim Riddlebarger who preaches against preterism (partial and full). He also holds to the belief that the book of Revelation was written after 70 AD which would blow preterism out of the water. I find myself still wanting to hang on to the partial preterist view though I am certainly no expert (or even a good amateur ) in this area. Any comments are welcome though our Premil and Postmil friends might want to stay out of this one because we will be discussing REAL eschatology !
Man I can't wait to see what a glorified body looks like so I will know what to expect my body to look like when the 1000yrs end. Not only that I'm extremely curious how these glorified bodies will look like after they have fallen into apostacy
Well, I'm married to someone who holds to Amil views, and am a member of a church that is predominately in that camp, yet I still hold onto a Postmil perspective. Stubborn, huh?