VirginiaHuguenot
Puritanboard Librarian
I am curious where theonomists on this board stand on the issue of the binding nature of the Old Testament dietary laws. As is well-known R.J. Rushdoony, the 'father of theonomy,' advocated that they are binding today (Law and Society, p. 702). Gary North and many other theonomists argue that they are not binding today (see http://freebooks.entrewave.com/freebooks/docs/html/gnbd/Chapter21.htm). There is clearly a division amongst theonomists on this point.
I view them as part of the ceremonial laws, which were abrogated in the New Testament. Where stand ye?
I view them as part of the ceremonial laws, which were abrogated in the New Testament. Where stand ye?