page 233 (context Romans 6:14)
I am more and more inclined to the belief that in order to a consistent interpretation of the New Testament, we must scrupulously regard Israel only as having been placed under The Law, though doubtless all men have moral responsibility.
page 234 - The Law of Moses has nothing to say to a believer! We know the legalists and the pretenders to human righteousness will cry out at this. But God says about The Law two things that cannot be escaped:
First, that the Gentiles were not under Moses' Law, that the Law, having never been given to them, but to Israel only. And second, that God, who gave to Israel the 'foregoing commandment' the Law "“ has disannulled the same...
Page 393, (context of Roman 10:4), "The vast discussion among commentators concerning the expression, 'the end of the Law' would never have been, had it been recognized: (1) that God gave the Law only to Israel "“ as He said; (2) that it was a temporary thing, a "˜ministration of death,´ to reveal sin, and therefore the necessity of Christ´s death; (3) that Christ having come, the day of the Law was over "“ it was annulled...It is because Reformed Theology has kept us Gentiles under the Law, "“if not as a means of righteousness, but as a 'rule of life' that all the trouble has arisen. The Law is no more a rule of life than it is a means of righteousness. Walking in the Spirit has now taken the place of walking by ordinances.