How do I know if its Emergent?

Status
Not open for further replies.

khaki

Puritan Board Freshman
Hi, I have read a few threads, and searched online...but can someone give me a reader's digest version of what an Emergent church is (without giving me a link, please)? Is it possible for a once PCA church to be an emergent church? Did I read correctly that Rick Warren is emergent? Is "emerging" different than "emergent"?
Thanks!
 
The PCA is in theory to hold to the westminster standards. The emergent church refers to the mood of using modern methods with either orthodox teaching or bad teaching. Nothing wrong inherently with the emergent church. The emerging is heretical and usually has an emphesis on left wing politics and a denial of scripture more specifically the sufficiency of scripture.

I do not like personally contemporary worship music but that is not what defines Christian confessional orthodoxy. There is nothing in the WCF that forbids contemporary stuff. But the PCA does have a wide variety in the denomination. Everything from near OPC to conservative charismatics. But each PCA church is orthodox and I would pick any PCA over any mainline church anyday.
 
The PCA is in theory to hold to the westminster standards. The emergent church refers to the mood of using modern methods with either orthodox teaching or bad teaching. Nothing wrong inherently with the emergent church. The emerging is heretical and usually has an emphesis on left wing politics and a denial of scripture more specifically the sufficiency of scripture.

I do not like personally contemporary worship music but that is not what defines Christian confessional orthodoxy. There is nothing in the WCF that forbids contemporary stuff. But the PCA does have a wide variety in the denomination. Everything from near OPC to conservative charismatics. But each PCA church is orthodox and I would pick any PCA over any mainline church anyday.

I think you may have your terms backwards (it is VERY difficult to keep the two straight!!!).

Although some emergent thinkers such as Brian McLaren and other Christian scholars such as D. A. Carson use "emerging" and "emergent" as synonyms, a large number of participants in the emerging church movement maintain a distinction between them. The term emergent church was coined in 1981 by Catholic political theologian, Johann Baptist Metz for use in a different context. "Emergent" is sometimes more closely associated with Emergent Village. Those participants in the movement who assert this distinction believe "emergents" and "emergent village" to be a part of the emerging church movement but prefer to use the term "emerging church" to refer to the movement as a whole while using the term "emergent" in a more limited way, referring to Brian McLaren and emergent village.

Many of those within the emerging church movement who do not closely identify with "emergent village" tend to avoid that organization's interest in radical theological reformulation and focus more on new ways of "doing church" and expressing their spirituality. Mark Driscoll, an early leader associated with the emerging church conversation, now distances himself from the "emergent thread." Some observers consider the "emergent stream" to be one major part within the larger emerging church movement. This may be attributed to the stronger voice of the 'emergent' stream found in the US which contrasts the more subtle and diverse development of the movement in the UK, Australia and New Zealand over a longer period of time. As a result of the above factors, the use of correct vocabulary to describe a given participant in this movement can occasionally be awkward, confusing, or controversial. Key voices in the movement have been identified with Emergent Village, thus the rise of the nomenclature "emergent" to describe participants in the movement. Some people affiliated with the relational network called "Emergent Village" do not identify with the label "emergent".

In other words, people like Driscoll and Kimball are OK being called "emerging" but don't want to be associated with heretics like McLaren and his "emergent" village. I'm not sure that the distinction is all that justifiable. Sounds to me like too many guys jumped on McLaren's bandwagon too quickly and are belatedly attempting to distance themselves from his heterodoxy any way they can. Having already aped the term "emerging," they are using "emergent" as the differentiator. Nice try, but no cigar.
 
P.s. that "Church History" motivational poster has a slight ring of truth to it in reference to many of the Anabaptist groups.
 
Thank You!

Thank you all very much for the help. This clarifies a lot for me. I can say my former PCA church is simply quite contemporary, non-confessional...but at least not emergent, so thanks for all the teaching on the subject.
Blessings,
khaki
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top