I'd never defend the fellow, but Paul's words are compelling to me. RZoomer isn't a theologian or pastor. But he does subscribe to the Westminster Confession. Thus, "What then? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed, and in that I rejoice." Do we rejoice he isn't in more error? Are we happy Jesus Christ is not obscured in the important ways? Do we refuse to believe God is using him for any good? Let's focus on the celebratory fact, after all, it could be CatholicZoomer, but it is not, or AthiestZoomer, but it is not. We're so debbie downer, out here on the PB. Are we rejoicing? That is the question. In pretence, perhaps, for gain he posts videos. Carnal? Perhaps. But again. . ."I rejoice," nonetheless. He could be SatanicZoomer, after all.
A little charity. A little grace. Don't hold back on pointing out his errors, surely. But at the end of the day, do we praise God a Christian subscribes to the Westminster, or, as it seems here, do we mourn he isn't as pure in the doctrines as we are? There's more similarity between RZoomer and me than me and a Reformed Baptist on PuritanBoard, for instance, because the Reformed Baptist fails to baptize their children, which is a far more serious error, in my mind, that a lot of Zoomer's idiosyncrasies.
