Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
which can be found here Defined King James Biblesuses footnotes to define virtually all of the archaic, obsolete, difficult, or uncommon words in the King James Bible.
You can also purchase for $0.65 a paper from TBS that has this.
As suitable for reading as it is valuable for reference, this book provides an explicit and comprehensive examination of every word in the Authorized Version of the Bible that has been deemed archaic, obsolete, antiquated, or otherwise outmoded. The result is both a fascinating and encyclopedic study of words--their meaning, derivation, usage, and significance. The thesis of this seminal work is that the Authorized Version is no more archaic than daily newspapers, current magazines, and modern Bible versions. To further supplement the work and substantiate the underlying thesis, considerable reference is made not only to a wide variety of newspapers and magazines, but also to four contemporary Bible versions. This book is unique in that it seeks neither to criticize nor correct the text of the Authorized Version. Extensively documented with over 5,300 footnotes, the book contains twenty-four chapters and twelve appendixes, with a preface, introduction, epilogue, and bibliography.
Robert did mean to tell you that in Australia they use the ESV which is basically the KJV with the archaic words updatedn the way of King James Bibles
Robert did mean to tell you that in Australia they use the ESV which is basically the KJV with the archaic words updated
That KJB Protector site is terrible. Fundamentalist pentacostal?
I think you are correct Robert. An Australian would say that a New Zealander living in Australia would be vastly improved by the experience. In the same vein the ESV is vastly improved over the RSV.The ESV was basically the RSV with a slight makeover, its like if you took a New Zealander and sent him to live in Australia for a few years where he partook of our hospitality & welfare, yet he would still be a New Zealander.
I think you are correct Robert. An Australian would say that a New Zealander living in Australia would be vastly improved by the experience. In the same vein the ESV is vastly improved over the RSV.The ESV was basically the RSV with a slight makeover, its like if you took a New Zealander and sent him to live in Australia for a few years where he partook of our hospitality & welfare, yet he would still be a New Zealander.
It is amazing when a New Zealander agrees with an Australian isn't it?
JI Packer, I understand, was one who encouraged the RSV as the starting point. The argument was that the RSV had its problems but its accuracy vs readability balance was helpful, ie, the RSV is more accurate than the NIV though not as evangelical. The goal of the ESV was a more accurate translation than the NIV etc. In terms of the liberalism of the RSV, I cannot find any of this in the ESV.The ESV falsely claims to be in the Lineage of the KJB, It would have been a considerably better translation if they had disregarded the RSV altogether and had done a translation from scratch or rather as they had claimed they could Truly have made
a translation in the Lineage of the KJB by using it as the starting text base, then you would have had a translation that was vastly improved over the RSV.
Actually they make the claim that the translation is in the Tyndale tradition.The ESV falsely claims to be in the Lineage of the KJB,
That KJB Protector site is terrible. Fundamentalist pentacostal?
its not without its merit, ... you need to define what you mean by "fundamentalism".
That KJB Protector site is terrible. Fundamentalist pentacostal?
its not without its merit, ... you need to define what you mean by "fundamentalism".
How about the very first sentence: "The Authorized King James Version of the Holy Bible is God’s providentially appointed Word for the whole world."
Which is apparently an even more extreme form of KJV-onlyism than Sam Gipp. They even seem to have a problem with other KJV texts that aren't in the "pure" Cambridge tradition as not being worthy of the title "inerrant", as theirs is.
In my humble opinion.The Authorized King James Version of the Holy Bible is God’s providentially appointed Word for the English speaking world.
Robert did mean to tell you that in Australia they use the ESV which is basically the KJV with the archaic words updated
This electronic text has been made in Australia for the purpose of the exaltation of the Bible within Australasia.
The KJV Pocket Reference Edition is modelled on the elegant KJV Pitt Minion and has exactly the same page layout in a smaller size, making it even more compact and portable.
It includes the Old and New Testaments, supported by Cambridge bold-figure cross-references, together with a pronunciation guide and glossary.
The Bibles all have gilt or silver edges and a ribbon marker. The choice includes traditional fastening styles – a zip and a button flap, as well as one edition with a thumb index.