staythecourse
Puritan Board Junior
My boss asked me: What do you think of R.C. Sproul?
Then we get into a discussion where he devalues Scripture and in essence says that we need to look at Scripture with new eyes as we discover new truths outside Scripture.
I tried to have him get specific and he offered the creation story. To him it's a symbolic story where Adam is simply a reference to mankind.
I told him Paul refers to him as being a real person, Jesus referred to him as well as real, and "through the disobedience of one man sin entered the world so through one man's obedience the many were made righteous."
He gave me a blank stare when I said, "and we agree Jesus was the Son of God, right?" If he references Adam as a real person we can take it as such.
He knew of Phil Johnson and his stance with Scripture and does not agree with him at all.
Any points of attack you think might help?
Then we get into a discussion where he devalues Scripture and in essence says that we need to look at Scripture with new eyes as we discover new truths outside Scripture.
I tried to have him get specific and he offered the creation story. To him it's a symbolic story where Adam is simply a reference to mankind.
I told him Paul refers to him as being a real person, Jesus referred to him as well as real, and "through the disobedience of one man sin entered the world so through one man's obedience the many were made righteous."
He gave me a blank stare when I said, "and we agree Jesus was the Son of God, right?" If he references Adam as a real person we can take it as such.
He knew of Phil Johnson and his stance with Scripture and does not agree with him at all.
Any points of attack you think might help?


