Thanks for all the post but now I have time for clarification.
1. Yes I have brought this issue up before and wanted to do so again to get more opinions on the matter. I think the previous thread was based on the want to wear a tie because Ronald Reagan wore one in the oval office. I got responses for that which were interesting and now I want more responses that will me understand the different sides of the issue. Not very "punkish"...is it Ben?
2. When I say I am going to where a tie for one out of the three services. It is because someone said I needed to "look like a minister" in a same sort of way we are to "walk like an Egyptian". This someone listened to my whole sermon and came out of it thinking I need a tie. If the issue of tie wearing is so great to this person to the point were it deters them the scriptures preached on as well as the sermon itself, then suit me up and grab me my finest tie! I think I expressed my want to do this for the service that this person is apart of in the OP. I do not mean to cause an offense nor cause a stumbling block for this person.
3. The other 2 services that we have is one that is casual dress (we got a lot of people heading from work right to church, this is a Saturday Evening service (another thread topic for another day)) and another Sunday service that is a mix of casual,semi-formal,and formal. My normal wear for Sunday is semi-formal since that is what the majority in all three services. They have no issue with it and in two of the services I have heard people actually like. The third service which is held early Sunday morning is the one that has the minority that I am trying to ease.
4. The Geneva robes would be a long way off from becoming used in my church. It is just a like of mine that people know of.
But I'm also not a fan of some punk "minister-in-training" thinking its his calling to "expose the cold dead formalism" of the congregants by breaking the rules.
Brother, you are truly mistaken and would wish you either inquire whether these things are so before throwing out accusations. This is the first time I have been told by a congregant that it is requirement to wear a tie in order to look like a minister. The other time was a suggestion by the youth pastor who merely suggested I do so, he did not make it requirement. How can you say that I'm trying to expose formalism by giving into this person's demands so that when the person see's me preaching (which is always one particular service) that the person will see a preacher that fits their "requirements" and allowing them to concentrate on the worship of God, reading of His word as well as preaching of.
Look, "not a kid" -- I not trying to shake things up, I'm in fact trying for the opposite. I would love to discuss this more with you either on private message or on this thread.