Partial Preterism & Amillenniumism

[Mayflower]

Are there any good books which has both Partial Preterism & Amillenniumism ?

 

[Blueridge Believer]

I think Jay Adams has written about it from that perspective. You might want to check him out.

 

[Scott1]

Others on Puritian Board have recommended Kim Riddlebarger's, "A Case for Amillennialism."

I have only perused the book, especially the last part, "Concluding thoughts." I was impressed with the clarity of the presentation of millennial issues, including a discussion of preterism.

My recollection is that in making the case for amillennialism, he does not favor preterism but does discuss it in various forms (e.g. "full" and "partial").

 

[Blueridge Believer]

Also get Mauro's book on Matthew 24 and Daniel's70 weeks.

 

[Andrew P.C.]

Others on Puritian Board have recommended Kim Riddlebarger's, "A Case for Amillennialism."

I have only perused the book, especially the last part, "Concluding thoughts." I was impressed with the clarity of the presentation of millennial issues, including a discussion of preterism.

My recollection is that in making the case for amillennialism, he does not favor preterism but does discuss it in various forms (e.g. "full" and "partial").

On Kim Riddlebarger, He doesn't have a fully partial preterist view in his book. It is a good book nonetheless though.

 

[Pilgrim]

The Jay Adams book is Because the Time is Near. It is considered a seminal work in arguing for the partial preterist view and was originally published in the 1960's.

 

[Scott1]

Others on Puritian Board have recommended Kim Riddlebarger's, "A Case for Amillennialism."

I have only perused the book, especially the last part, "Concluding thoughts." I was impressed with the clarity of the presentation of millennial issues, including a discussion of preterism.

My recollection is that in making the case for amillennialism, he does not favor preterism but does discuss it in various forms (e.g. "full" and "partial").

On Kim Riddlebarger, He doesn't have a fully partial preterist view in his book. It is a good book nonetheless though.

To clarify for those looking for resources on this,

Are you saying Mr Riddlebarger's book does not advocate a full or partial preterist view

or

does not discuss a partial preterist view much in his book?

Thanks.