Purpose Driven Worship Defined

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally posted by SemperFideles
What is milk? It is the Gospel. That's all I'm asking the focus be on. Too much about methods, not enough about Christ.

Exactly right. The problem with PDL and its ilk is precisely that it has not even gotten the "milk" right . . . I do not believe anyone here has been criticising PDL in regards to the more complex doctrines of the faith. The influence of PDL is troubling because it obscures the true spiritual "milk ", the Gospel of Christ.

PDL is not spiritual milk. PDL does not present the ABC's of the Christian faith. So any charge that we criticise PDL out of intellectual pride is simply unfounded. We criticise PDL not because it is too basic and elementary, but because it pushes aside and misrepresents many of the basic and elementary truths needed for salvation. We criticise not because it speaks in a simple language, but because what it is saying in that simple language is often wrong and misleading.

Spiritual milk is what we find in the catechisms, not in PDL.
 
...you would realize you're arguing against the necessity to make the Gospel central first before moving on to meat. The meat is wisdom that flows out of a heart transformed and matured by the Word of God and the Church.

I won't dispute the issue that some Reformed people get needlessly caught up in being punctillious about certain issues. The Gospel is one area where I become strident and uncompromising over however.

And we should not compromise the Gospel - Not arguing against that at all - I would consider the centrality of the Gospel the foudation of the church, too - my point is - I argue that RW does, too (take a look at the links I published, if you have the time) and PDL is a good method to begin the process - a good primer - I actually thought the PDL book was Basic Reformed Theology Principles 101 - a good way to reintroduce the "easy believism" crowd to the tenets of the Reformed faith and Biblical worship with an eye toward deeper truth.

Isn't the Reformed faith all about methods? creeds, catechism, confessions...those are all methods to understand God and grow in knowledge and faith - I am asking for consideration for the folks that have not the measure of faith to comprehend and digest these things - they still need to be nurtured and edified - I think innovation in these areas can honor the Master Innovator.

You know as well as I do that not all will progress to deeper levels of the faith through knowledge - some will always sup the milk - the basics of the Gospel, fellowship and worship without moving up and onward in maturity - why seperate ourselves from these children and fellowship with them through our harsh judgementalism?

I am not suggesting that I have any merit over anyone - I am trying to frame the conversation for discussion, it just seems the bias is so strong, it is hard to genuinely and charitably discuss the potential merits of the PD movement and how it may be leveraged to deepen the knowledge of God in Christ through the Holy Spirit.

When every step is met with the harshest of condemnations and strident rebuttals, it is hard to see the charity...

Romans 15

1We who are strong have an obligation to bear with the failings of the weak, and not to please ourselves. 2Let each of us please his neighbor for his good, to build him up.

When I saw your criticism and plan to oppose your pastor's decision to utilize the curriculum, I was interested in why you did not consider this a great opportunity in your teaching ministry to incorporate some of the "meatier" elements for the potential flock. You could be the voice and a guide to Semper Reformanda! :D

Why not market ourselves as "Purpose Driven Deluxe" or something?

"When you are ready to go to the next level in the pursuit of God knowledge and His purpose."

....................................................................................................................

BTW: Semper, are you there as a posted person, or are you there as a missionary?

[Edited on 12-9-2005 by jdlongmire]

[Edited on 12-9-2005 by jdlongmire]
 
JD,
I appreciate your posts. You have been arguing in a very charitable way that is furthering the discussion and helping to clarify the issues.

One comment/question I have for you is, and maybe I missed it, but I never heard you speak directly to the issue of Warren's "gospel" on page 58 of his book that I posted previously.

Yes, I did view the link (I had also already seen that earlier), and I won't offer any criticism of his gospel presentation (and I'm not implying that any is warranted).

Also, if the book is NOT about "methods", then why, as I addressed earlier, has Warren said the book has been so "helpful" to Muslims, Jews, etc?

Please answer these two points. I am seriously interested in another way to view these, in case I am being too critical.


If Warren is truly "starting with the Gospel" and his methods build on that, then why do other faiths find the book enlightening? And why would Warren, on national TV, try to make a case for this instead of a case for Christ?
 
Thanks - I appreciate the tone you have set, as well...:handshake:

Is this the post?

Originally posted by alwaysreforming
This part concerns me:

Whether it's soda pop or pop Christianity, the marketing works. It's a surefire approach. Reinforce the negative brand perception or your competition - boring, unfriendly, and greedy. Present yourself as the alternative - exciting, friendly, and caring.

edited for tidiness - :D

[Edited on 12-9-2005 by jdlongmire]
 
No, sorry, it wasn't in this thread at all (I got confused)

I clipped this from the appropriate thread and here it is:


"Here's the "Gospel" by Rick Warren, quoted from page 58.

"Second, receive. Receive Jesus into your life as your Lord and Savior. Receive his forgiveness for your sins. Receive his Spirit, who will be able to give you the power to fulfill your life purpose. The Bible says, "Whoever accepts and trusts the Son gets in on everything, life complete and forever!"

"Wherever you are reading this, I invite you to bow your head and quietly whisper the prayer that will change your eternity: "Jesus, I believe in you and I receive you." Go ahead.

If you sincerely meant that prayer, congratulations! Welcome to the family of God! You are now ready to discover and start living God's purpose for your life. I urge you to tell someone about it. "

...end of book quote


Also, his "Hula Worship" that goes on at his church. And number three, he seems to be compromising when he gets on TV by getting the heat totally off his back that he's preaching an exclusive message as he says that both Jewish and Muslim folks are also getting a lot out of the book (and its implied that he means without wavering in their own beliefs)."
 
So - let me make sure I understand your areas of focus:

1. This is too simplistic or an heretical exposition of the Gospel call?

2. Hula worship - inappropiate expression of worship - not enough gravitas?

3. The concepts in PDL should emphasize exclusivity - no practical applications of timeless truth or winsome exposition?

Seeking to understand...

[Edited on 12-9-2005 by jdlongmire]

[Edited on 12-9-2005 by jdlongmire]
 
Hmmm.... the way you phrased your questions has got me thinking a little more deeply about these points... but on first glance, yes, the way you phrased it does seem to codify what I'm getting at.

But I wouldn't go so far as to say, "no practical applications to timeless truth..."


This part about the Gospel is the main focus and I would like to concentrate on that:

"Wherever you are reading this, I invite you to bow your head and quietly whisper the prayer that will change your eternity: "Jesus, I believe in you and I receive you." Go ahead. If you sincerely meant that prayer, congratulations! Welcome to the family of God!"

This part I have a problem with. It wouldn't be so bad if it was at the end of some glorious exposition of the person and work of Jesus Christ. At least then it would be carrying with it some substance. But here its at the end of a chapter, where the chapter was on "how can I bring glory to God?" It starts with the premise that you're "receiving Jesus" so that you can then accomplish the greater "purpose" God has for you, which is bringing Him glory. When God's glory is not found FIRST at the foot of the cross for FORGIVENESS, then it misses our purpose in Christ Jesus. For us as fallen creatures, what could be more "glorious" than being reconciled to a Most Holy and Perfect God, through the broken body and shed blood of Jesus Christ, one most perfect and holy himself. The book nowhere truly gives you this sense. We are nowhere in these pages found to be vile, found to be wretches in his sight... who DESPARATELY need a Saviour! Where's the Fall? Really, where is the Fall of mankind in this book? Our alienation from God is something much different than just "now we're not behavin so good anymore."
Maybe I missed it, but could you show me at least a few paragraphs in a row where our fallen nature is discussed?

"Now, is this a theology textbook? Does he have to cover every minute point of doctrine in order for it to be sound?"

No, absolutely not. But neither does he need to be "passing out Christ" to every "purposeless" person that reads up to page 58!
Don't offer Christ as a solution to a mini-problem. If you're not going to "cut us to the heart", then leave the shed blood out of it!

People don't just "get convicted" that they're not "living their whole lives for the glory of God", and then repent of that by "receiving Jesus" so that they can get in step with their true purpose and begin living it out. That's not what its all about. Sure Warren has us repenting of our sin, it just seems to be the sin of "not fulfilling our purpose" that is driving every aspect of his exposition.

I just noticed this:
look at the sentence immediately following his "Receive... and Welcome to the family" line...
"You are now ready to discover and start living God's purpose for your life."

If he didn't really mean that Christ's blood is for your lack of fulfilling your purpose, then he wouldn't have hammered that last point home. We HAVE to read this man in context, its only fair.

And even when he talks about "living your lives for God's glory", he doesn't exposit those attributes of God that are worthy to be worshiped, but just makes "worship" itself an inherently good act that everyone should do.

When he talks about forgiveness he says, "If you want to know how much you matter to God, look to Christ with his arms stretched out on the cross, saying, "I love you this much! I'd rather die than live without you!"" pg 79

So you can take snippets of the book here and there and say, "Oh yeah, Warren mentions sin" or "He talks about God's glory, or God's will, or Jesus, etc"
But when you put the whole thing in context, and read large chunks of it together, one begins to see just how cheesy and sappy it is.

Now do you understand a little better where I'm coming from? Does everyone agree/disagree....? I'd love to find out that I'm just being overly critical and hyper polemic, because if I am, then I'm probably not understanding the Gospel the way I should, and I definitely want to get THAT right.
 
Sure Warren has us repenting of our sin, it just seems to be the sin of "not fulfilling our purpose" that is driving every aspect of his exposition.

So:

1. Is he omitting salient, relevant and critical items from the Gospel call in this book?

(BTW: did you listen to the Gospel presentation on the site? I thought it was fairly complete...from our inability to save ourselves to the substitutionary atonement of Christ - all in a winsome manner in lay terms)

or

one begins to see just how cheesy and sappy it is.

2: His method is distasteful to you?

(BTW2: Look at page 55 top 2 paragraphs)

[Edited on 12-9-2005 by jdlongmire]
 
Thanks for responding, JD!

Yes, I would say he is omitting crucial information.

And is his method distasteful?
I'm not sure if I'd put it like that. And don't read too much into the words "cheesy" and "sappy", they weren't the main thrust of my message, but did in a way describe the overall tenor that I got from the book.

So what do you think of those concerns above; that taken in context he is making our "lack of fulfilling our purpose" the central theme of the Gospel? Instead of truly putting emphasis on Christ as the basis for all we do as Christians, he's made it "purpose." "Purpose" is driving his book. He has a VERY appropriate title!

:D

Can you see this in his writings now that its been pointed out, or am I offbase with this? Thanks for dialoging!
 
Well - I would like to respond with a question:

What is the chief end (purpose) of Man?

...and isn't that the culmination of the area he extends the Gospel call?

[Edited on 12-9-2005 by jdlongmire]
 
Sorry it took me so long to respond...

I see where you're going with your question, and yes, I agree that glorifying God is the chief end of man.
But I guess it depends on what we're glorifying Him about, and this is where I think man's "purpose" has trumped "glorifying God", even IF Warren has tried to verbally equate the two somewhat.

Again, it has to do with what we're glorifying God about, and WHY we're glorifying Him, and I contend that the main issue with fallen mankind is God's mercy and grace to us through the shed blood of Jesus. Warren seems to be talking "fulfillment" in our lives moreso than gratitude over Christ, and I don't think you can properly make a case that he's not.

If you were to ask someone off the street who has read Warren's book, "What did you get out of it? What do you think the main thrust of his message is? Tell me about "glorifying God"?"

I could be wrong, but I'm willing to wager 90% of those people, if they made reference to Jesus at all, would NOT be talking about the person and work of Christ, but about their OWN works, and how now they're "really going to be fulfilling their purpose in life!" And THIS, by the way, is probably why the book can be so "helpful" to Muslims and Jews.

Actually, you know what... I'M going to do my own study, with people who are already Christians who have read the book! I think this is a very fair way to tell how much emphasis their "being redeemed" was given in the book. (Without which their basis for glorifying God is greaty skewed)
If you have any suggestions as to what questions to ask, I'd appreciate the input.

Now I can tell I'm really "pushing the envelope" on my own knowledge of PDL, and I think its best if I don't go any further with answering questions relating to the contents of the book. To do so would I'm sure bring me into slander as I comment in ignorance about things I should not be speaking about. Maybe we can just leave the issues on the table as much as we've highlighted them here in this thread and concentrate on the points that have already been raised.

If we try to talk too much about everything, then we're going to have to get into his dreadful (almost to the point of being dishonest) misrepresentation of Scripture... and I'd rather not even go there.

So, what do you think of the Gospel as presented in PDL? (not the video link, which I saw and have no contention with)
And can you REALLY glorify God without the Gospel? (and I mean in a way different than how even the reprobate in Hell glorify God)
 
To set forth trust in "new methods" rather than the Gospel in simple Word & Sacrament is at the heart of it idolatry. To defend against this is not legalism but defending AGAINST true legalism and works salvation under any label. The so called "easier/milk" methods in the end are a poisonous anti-gospel spinkled with "gopel-like" language. This is what we must see. Again it is not the impuning of a man's motives, but the correction of the teaching that in reality leads away from Christ in the end.

The difference between today's false gospel and the true Gospel in its communication:

Situation #1 the true Gospel delivered (Here faith is biblical and sheer passive trusting in all of one's life):

NOTE: Here there is pure proclamation as in "Good News".
Pastor: Christ has died for your sins, all of them including your sin nature and He is all your righteousness past, present and future - thought, word and deed.

Hearer: You mean that even if I don't clean up my life I'm totally forgiven?

Pastor: Yes, indeed you cannot clean up your life else you will not be saved, God reconciled us in Christ "while we were yet sinners" and "dead in sins and trespasses". You can come in no other way.
Hearer: No conditions, nothing for me to do. Do I need to be righteous?

Pastor: No or if you think so "may your money perish with you that you think you could purchase the gift of God."

Hearer: So there are literally no conditions ever past, present or future - by thought, word or deed, strength or sincerity of repentance or faith?

Pastor: None, as a matter of fact if you set forth conditions and attempt to do something it is not grace nor can you have it. God's gift is received by the hand that is empty and indeed dead and has no strength itself to grasp. It is passively received freely and without conditions, thus it is grace and never works. Pure utter, absolute and naked trust, that is to be convinced and rest in Christ alone and that alone is true faith/trust. It is in a word proclaimed to you to cause faith/trust, "This Christ has done FOR YOU specifically." It is an announcement that has come your way. It is literally God saying and announcing, "I forgive you for Christ's sake". Without pre-existing repentance or faith, for you cannot cause these. The announcement IS the voice of God stating a fact that cannot be a lie or false.

Hearer: If God has said it then how can I not believe!

Pastor: Amen, indeed salvation has come to this household.
Situation #2 the false gospel delivered (Here faith is false and of the devil and defined as obedient faith):

NOTE: Here there is pure works with "gospel like language" interspersed.

Pastor: Christ has died for your sins, all of them including your sin nature and He is all your righteousness past, present and future - thought, word and deed. You must repent and you must believe.

Hearer: Pastor I want to be saved and baptized.

Pastor: Are you born again?

Hearer: I'm not sure how can I know?

Pastor: Have you shown forth the fruits of faith that prove you are of the faith?

Hearer: I don't know I still sin and very much feel the draw and indeed fall into sin.

Pastor: If you do not repent you will go to hell.

Hearer: I do repent but how can I know if it is enough?

Pastor: Have you repented of all your sins?

Hearer: How do I know, I can't seem to shake it?

Pastor: You do not desire to sin anymore do you?

Hearer: Yes but no, I both desire to be righteous but also have desires toward my sins. How can I know.

Pastor: You must repent and show forth righteousness in a changed life.

Hearer: So I must repent first before I can be saved and trust in Christ and be baptized into Him?

Pastor: You must have fruits first or I can never baptize you, fruits and repentance and faith. (Implication communicated): Then, this gospel is yours and you may then have peace.)

The first situation is the true Gospel and is delivered continually over the life of the church and Christians and not just initial conversion. The pastor is preaching Christ and truly calling his people. The second is a false gospel and indeed not Christ or His Gospel at all. This pastor is idol worshipping and not trusting the Word of God though he thinks he is. The second breeds false faith, self-righteousness and despair its author is the devil though it seasons its communication with Christian and gospel-like language.

When the speech type or form of the language is such that it is command and not proclamation it is definitively not the Gospel, that is the Good NEWS of Christ. It matters little what specific words are used to form the speech type.

There is this difference in the type of speech between the two:
The first is proclamation and announcement which in turn causes true faith that is true trust and not defined by obedience but upon the convincing and trusting of the announcement and proclamation - that is to literally trust the Word of God delivered. From this arises without effort and naturally the fruits of such true faith for this faith is real saving faith and being called by God. At length the fruits of faith here will show forth in true love regardless of the outward appearance for all is giving forth from the Gospel of Christ. This faith over flows, even imperfectly among mutual sinners. For all see themselves, looking at the cross via the true Gospel, as nothing more than sinners under grace. All gifts and works are good and mutually appreciated and revered.

The second, more common today in many churches, is command and a "to do" something and obedience couched as a "faith" - that is a faith defined by obedience. From this arises only further wrath and hell. The works arising from this fallen devil's faith are sheer hypocrisy and self indulgent works disguised as grace and faith. This false faith deceives or despairs and is indeed not faith at all. At length the fruits of this faith here will show forth in outward appearance as clean and good but in reality and inwardly strife and hatred will subtly ensue. Differing levels of "christians" will arise in the form of the more "spiritual" Christian verses the "less" spiritual Christian. Some will judge and doubt another's true faith forbidden in Scripture. There will be interest in what a persons leisure life is while works become diminished in what they are. Works at length will become restrictively confined to just a few and mainly those within what is called the "ministry". Lay vocation will at length be despised or at leased looked down upon as lesser than doing the "ministry". Men will raise themselves up in their gifts and talk about other's gifts as lesser or those less engaged or less spiritual or less involved in the "official ministry" will at length be despised and doubted and looked down upon.

What PDL gives as "gospel" with one hand it immediatelly takes back with the other: "Christ alone save (Gospel given), If you prayed for this with sincerity you will be saved (gospel re-snatched away)

Here's a great discussion that analyzes PDL in 2003: I lost the link, sorry about the length:

-Ldh

Issues, Etc.
Broadcast Transcript
with
Radio Host Todd Wilken
Discussion: The Purpose Driven Life
Guests: Professor Larry Rast, Pastor Wil Weedon, and Pastor Tom Baker
Date: October 29, 2003
WILKEN: Welcome back to Issues, Etc. We´re beginning a two-hour roundtable discussion for the remainder of the program. The book has swept the nation. This is"”well, it´s a New York Times best seller, there´s no doubt about that. Congregations are buying this thing in mass. People are buying it. Their pastors are saying, "You gotta buy this book! You gotta read this book!" Some of them are saying, "You have to buy this book! You have to read this book, The Purpose Driven Life, by Rick Warren." It´s not his first book. It´s not the first book that´s come out from Rick Warren. He´s pastor of Saddleback Community Church in California. The churches are doing "40 Days of Purpose," and that follows chapter by chapter this book through 40 days. The book is actually written for that very purpose so that congregations"”whole groups of Christians and individuals"”can go through this book chapter by chapter one chapter a day. And by the end Rick Warren promises that you will not only know God´s purpose for your life, but you will be better equipped to receive eternal reward.
So what´s wrong with The Purpose Driven Life? What´s so troubling about it? We´ve been talking about it for weeks here on Issues, Etc. and finally we´ve assembled our roundtable of pastors and professors. Our call-in numbers are 505-7850 or 1-800-730-2727. Our roundtable includes Pastor Will Weedon of St. Paul Lutheran Church in Hamel, Ill. Pastor Weedon, welcome to Issues, Etc.
WEEDON: Hi, Todd! Good to be with you today.
WILKEN: We also have Pastor Tom Baker, known to our KFUO listeners as the host of Law & Gospel here on AM 850 KFUO. He´s director of development for the Concordia Mission Society. Tom, welcome back to Issues, Etc.
BAKER: Good to be with you tomorrow.
WILKEN: And Dr. Larry Rast is our guest. Dr. Larry Rast, he´s associate professor of historical theology at Concordia Theological Seminary in Fort Wayne, Ind. Larry, welcome back to Issues, Etc.
RAST: Hi, Todd. Great to be with you.
WILKEN: All right, gentlemen, I´m going to go down the line one by one. I´d like to begin with you, Tom, your general impression of The Purpose Driven Life.
BAKER: I think Rick Warren has good intentions and such, but I believe he´s right in the heritage of a Billy Graham, modern evangelical thought, very"”from a Lutheran point of view"”unable to distinguish between Law and Gospel, and has some other problems with the theology of glory, Semi-Pelagianism, little bit of legalism. Outside of that, it´s not too bad a´ book.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, your first impression of The Purpose Driven Life by Rick Warren.
WEEDON: It´s a very well written book, and I think that´s part of its danger. It´s very"”the man writes very well. It´s very easy to read, and it´s full of Scripture! Every page you turn, he´s quoting the Word of God at you in some translation or another. And by the time you´re done, you´re thinking, "Wow! There"”there can´t be anything wrong with this! This man is full of the Word of God!" And he writes so well, and it sounds so practical and so good, and you don´t even see the poison that´s been slipped to you as you read along.
WILKEN: Larry, your impression of The Purpose Driven Life.
RAST: Well, I´ll pick up one word that Pastor Weedon uses just before and that is practical. One of the things that I think people find attractive about this book is it´s straightforward, simplistic, not in the negative sense"”character"”that is, extremely accessible and easily put into practice. The problem is, however, that as my two colleagues have pointed out very well already is that there are some basic problems here, like the confusion of Law and Gospel, confusion of justification and sanctification and, ultimately, it leads you in the wrong direction, which is to take your focus off of Christ and to put it upon yourself.
WILKEN: Now working back the other direction again, beginning with you, Larry. What positives do you find in this book?
RAST: Well, again, there´s a lot of Scripture that´s present in it. There are some practical kinds of lessons to be learned. There is an emphasis on the uniqueness of every human being. There´s the idea that you´re created by God and that is certainly to be affirmed. There´s the idea that you do have unique talents and abilities that can be used in service to the church and one to another and to those outside the church. And all of those things are very good and proper. So in that respect there is a certain usefulness within the book. However, again, that is often tempered by the way it takes the emphasis off Christ and puts it on the self.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, beyond your first impressions, what would you say are the positives of The Purpose Driven Life?
WEEDON: I was really impressed by how he clearly confessed that God uses adversity to bring blessing. That is a theme that is dear to any Lutheran heart, and I was glad to hear that he got that for the most part very clearly said. I also thought his section on temptation and the way temptation works was very well written and very accurately followed the biblical teaching.
WILKEN: And, Tom, finally you on that question. What are the positives, if any, that you can find in The Purpose Driven Life?
BAKER: I think occasionally there are some good exegetical points, which simply means matters of interpretation of the Scripture. His discussion on Romans 8:28-29, I learned some things I was unaware of. I thought that was very good. And then throughout the book he has comments that, in my opinion, seem to contradict other parts of the book but in and of themselves are very good, such as, "Without God life makes no sense . . . At death you won´t leave home, you´ll go home . . . God´s glory is best seen in Jesus Christ . . . Friendship with God is possible only because of the grace of God and the sacrifice of Jesus." And I could on and on with statements that, in their"”just taking a look at them at first glance"”they sound very well.
WILKEN: Now this is going to emerge in the course of this conversation that, with the positives stated here, there is even a more subtle danger in this book as Pastor Weedon pointed out, and that is, at least in my reading of the book, it is often"”he often begins very well, and then with the left hand takes what he´s giving with the right. And we´ll get a bit of explanation of that a little later in the conversation. First, let´s hear from Rick Warren himself on the premise of The Purpose Driven Life:
One day you´re gonna stand before God, and He will do an audit of your life"”a final exam before you enter eternity. The Bible says, "˜Remember each of us will stand personally before the judgment seat of God. Yes, each of us will have to give a personal account to God. Fortunately, God wants us to pass this test so He has given us the questions in advance. And from the Bible we can surmise that God will ask us two crucial questions. First, what did you do with my Son, Jesus Christ? God won´t ask you about your religious background or doctrinal views. The only thing that will matter is, did you accept what Jesus did for you, and did you learn to love and trust Him? Jesus said, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." Second, what did you do with what I gave you? What did you do with your life, all the gifts, the talents, the opportunities, energy, relationships, resources that God gave you? Did you spend them all on yourself? Or did you use them for the purposes God made you for? Preparing you for these two questions is the goal of this book. The first question will determine where you spend eternity. The second question will determine what you do in eternity.
WILKEN: Now, that´s Rick Warren. He´s laying out the premise for The Purpose Driven Life, and we´ve got a lot there to react to initially. First, Larry, what do you make of his statement that there´s going to be essentially an audit or a final exam in eternity based on two questions, "What did you do with my Son, Jesus Christ?" and "What did you do with what I gave you?"
RAST: Yeah, in other parts of the book he calls this life a "try out" for that final exam as well, kind of a practice run, if you will, as you prepare yourself for what is coming down the road. The Scripture says that "indeed at the last day the Lord will return and He´ll separate the sheep from the goats," that there is a judgment coming, and that we all will, in fact, be judged. But, in fact, those of us who are in Christ will find that it´s not us and our works and what we´ve done and what we´ve accomplished that is the basis of that audit, if you will, but rather that the audit is accomplished already, that in fact Christ by His perfect life, suffering, death, resurrection and ascension has in fact finished it all already. Salvation unto us has come by God´s free grace and favor, not by anything we can and would do of ourselves or with the help of God. Rather, salvation by grace is just that, God´s free gift to us undeserved by us but nevertheless granted freely by Him.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, he seems to be making a distinction. Okay, if you´re a Christian, you´re gonna be saved. Judgment Day for you is more or less so God can determine what kind of eternal rewards He´s going to give you, and it´s going to be based upon these two questions, and it´s going to be based upon whether or not you´ve fulfilled God´s five purposes for your life. What do you make of these this teaching about Judgment Day for the Christian?
WEEDON: You know what I really miss in this entire way of speaking? Doesn´t it almost sound as though, you know, God´s gonna sit down and have a chat with you about this--you know, "How did you do it?" Where is the fear and the trembling where Paul can say, you know, "We will all stand before the judgment seat. Therefore knowing the fear the Lord""”you know, where is the fear that rings through in the church´s hymn like Dies Irae, "Day of Wrath, O Day of Mourning": "Though the book exactly worded, wherein all hath been recorded, then shall judgment be awarded. What shall I frail man be pleading when the just are mercy needing? Who for me be interceding?" What I see in his discussion here, as I think it´s endemic throughout the entire work, is he has trimmed down the wrath of God to a manageable proportion. In fact, I think he´s pretty much wiped out the wrath of God.
WILKEN: Tom, your thought.
BAKER: Boy, I almost the exact opposite impression. This is not a heaven I´m looking forward to. Not at all.
WEEDON: [LAUGHTER]
WILKEN: What do you mean?
BAKER: Well, first of all he says on page 231, "At the end of your life on earth, you will stand before God and He is going to evaluate how well you served others with your life." Whoops. It doesn´t look like I´m gonna make it, especially when I maybe give an excuse. Listen to 232. This is God speaking to me: "Sorry, wrong answer. I created, saved, and called you and commanded you to live a life of service. What part did you not understand?" In fact, this is a heaven I´m not even looking forward to! Number one, he says there are three rewards you get in eternity. The first reward is "Good job, well done." I´m not sure He´s gonna say that to me because I confess every Sunday I´m a poor, miserable sinner deserving nothing but temporal and eternal punishment, not eternal heaven! But listen to the next one: "Next you will receive a promotion and be given greater responsibility." That´s what I´m trying to get away from on earth! Ha! If anything, this book has moved me not to do anything in the church because I´d rather"”since we´re all gonna have the same bliss, what he seems to be saying is, if you really work hard for God here on earth, you´re gonna have to work even harder in heaven. Well, forget it! I´ll prefer just to stay here on earth and do my little things, and then I won´t have so much responsibility in eternity. This whole thing"”I don´t know if he´s talking about degrees of glory or whatever, but there certainly does"”and this is the most important part of his whole book"”is that Judgment Day is gonna be the day that God will decide your reward depending on what you do! It seems to me that´s what the entire Reformation was against.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, what do you make of this teaching that he seems to be saying, "Okay, you´re gonna go to heaven, but what you´re determining by what you do in this life is how good your state´s gonna be in heaven, or your estate in heaven." What do you make of this?
WEEDON: Again, as I said in the beginning, I think it´s a dangerous thought"”it´s a very dangerous thought. When you go to heaven and"”the Lord does indeed reward with different degrees of glory the works that are done. The thought is not, "Ah! Look what I got! It´s pretty neat!" It´s like, "Oh, my Lord, would you really give that to me? Oh, how can that be?" And when you look at your neighbor and see what they´ve been given, you don´t say, "Oh, I should´ve worked harder on earth! I would´ve gotten the glory that they´ve got!" You go, "Look at that! Aren´t they shining with the gifts of the Lamb?"
WILKEN: Larry, your thoughts on eternal rewards and, if you would, explain to us what Scripture teaches regarding eternal rewards and how they are acquired.
RAST: Well, the eternal rewards that we enjoy are the gifts of God. In fact, what Warren himself does in a couple of points in the book is contradict himself. Where he talks about how we have to become more and more like Christ, we have to do more, we have to be prepared for the final exam and the like, and he even goes so far as to cite the text that says, "May you always be filled with the fruit of your salvation, those good things that are produced in your life by Jesus Christ," and he says that then proves how we have to work harder.
But you look at this and it says, "May you always be filled the fruit of your salvation, those things that are produced in your life by Jesus Christ." The Lord is the One who is at work in us both to justify us and to sanctify us. He remains faithful to us. He brings us into the faith. He nurtures us in the faith. He maintains us in the faith. He is the beginning and the end of all things. And so as we enjoy His mere presence in heaven, we won´t come in via some exam in which we find ourselves, like Tom rightly noted, disappointed at the results! "Well, you got a C on your exam. You do get into heaven, but it ain´t so great where you´re gonna end up." The fact that we´re there, the fact that our Lord welcomes us to Himself, is purely by His grace. So, again, at every point Warren takes the focus off of Christ and puts it onto the human subject.
WILKEN: Now, lying behind much of Rick Warren´s book, The Purpose Driven Life, is his view of free will:
It´s time to settle this issue. Who are you gonna live for, yourself or God? You may hesitate wondering whether you have the strength to live for God. Don´t worry! God will give you what you need if you´ll just make the choice to live for Him.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, there was a big if there. God will give you what you need to pass this test if you"”how do you respond to that?
WEEDON: Everything that he says of salvation he has made"”because he has predicated it upon our actions, he´s made every last bit of it wobble. There´s no way that a person working through The Purpose Driven Life"”I´m assuming a person, you know, a heathen coming to the book and trying to work their way through it"”how can they ever reach any kind of assurance of their salvation because it´s always predicated upon what they´ve done? In fact, we´ll probably come to that startling passage where after he gives you a "sinner´s prayer," he immediately adds, "IF you sincerely meant that"! He takes away with the one hand what he gives with the other! And that is a consistent pattern.
WILKEN: Let´s hear that:
God is not a cruel slave driver or bully who uses brute force to coerce us into submission. He doesn´t try to break our will, but He woos us to Himself so that we might offer ourselves freely to Him. God is a lover and a liberator, and surrendering to Him brings freedom, not bondage. When we completely surrender ourselves to Jesus, we discover that He is not a tyrant but a Savior. Not a boss but a Brother. Not a dictator but a Friend.
WILKEN: Tom, this sounds so very, very good. But again what I heard in there is, "when we surrender, if we do this." What kind of conditions are you hearing here?
BAKER: As one professor at the seminary always asks, who´s driving the verbs? Which simply means, who is the subject of the sentence? Who is the cause of the salvation? On page 20 he says that "if you don´t have a relationship with Christ, I´ll explain how to begin one." And he does that on page 58 by saying, "all you have to do is accept God´s offer." That´s like going to somebody in a casket in a funeral home and saying, "All you have to do to get out is just lift your leg." On page 79 he says, "We might offer ourselves freely to Him." On page 118, "When we place our faith in Christ." And 137, "The decision to commit yourself to Christ brings salvation." So we´re the ones driving all the verbs here. And he is totally taken up with quoting both Billy Graham and also Bill Bright on the four spiritual laws where, obviously, they are getting mixed up the imperative with the indicative, which simply means that where God explains how God keeps His promises, they reinterpret them to mean this is what human beings are to do in order that God might fulfill His promises. They have everything in this area backwards. We call it Semi-Pelagianism, and as host you will explain that.
WILKEN: Well, Semi-Pelagianism, being a softer form of Pelagianism, taught that man has the capacity to seek God in and of himself apart from any movement of God´s Word or the Holy Spirit. Semi-Pelagianism says, well, man doesn´t have a complete capacity, but man and God could cooperate to a certain degree in this salvation effort. Larry, what do you make of Warren when he says God doesn´t break our will?
RAST: I think one of the things he´s worried about here is a typical error that those of the Arminian persuasion make. They´re worried about the hard-lined notion of double predestinarian Calvinism that says no matter what the human will may choose by virtue of God´s hidden decree in eternity, a person´s eternal destiny is set even before their creation. And so falling off the horse on the other side, Arminians tend to say, no, everything is open to every single person. There is no bondage of the will. There is complete and utter freedom for every human character. And so what he´s saying is that a basic part of human personality is the freedom of the will to choose one way or the other, either for the evil or for the good. And in this case he´s saying we have the spiritual ability to do that. We have the ability to choose God or to choose the evil. Now, what this does, of course, is turn God into a passive bystander who watches as the real job gets done by us. God kind of standing by the sidelines hoping that we´ll choose to do the right thing in seeking Him, but if it doesn´t turn out that way, well, He sorta throws His hands up and says, "I did what I could, but this person chose to reject me and off they go." But if a person does choose then to accept God´s offer of salvation, then God says, "Oh, great! Now let me tell you what else you have to do! There´s this whole other list of five purposes that you have to fulfill before things are really and totally accomplished."
WILKEN: Now, before we go to the break, Pastor Weedon had mentioned the sinner´s prayer that is recommended. Tom had mentioned the off-quoting of Bill Bright. Let´s hear Rick Warren on this subject:
Wherever you are listening to this, I invite you to bow your head and quietly whisper the prayer that will change your eternity. "Jesus, I believe in You and I receive You." Go ahead. Just say "Jesus, I believe in You and I receive You." If you sincerely meant that prayer, congratulations! Welcome to the family of God!
WILKEN: Pastor Baker, respond to this. You´ve talked a lot about the sinner´s prayer.
BAKER: It´s almost unbelievable that someone who reads the Bible can say something like this, that someone who is an unbeliever can say "I believe You" without having received Him. It just makes no sense at all. It´s kind of"”if you´re an unbeliever, you don´t want to receive Jesus Christ. And if are a believer, then there´s no reason to receive Him because He´s already in you. But it once more shows the absolute necessity for people like this to give themselves credit where God alone should get the credit. Jesus is kinda clear, "You have not chosen Me, I have chosen you." And all this theology is directly opposite that very clear statement.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, before we go with a minute here, is this really kind of the fatal flaw of The Purpose Driven Life"”this view of man´s capacity, of God´s passivity, man as the active agent?
WEEDON: I think so because the theme of choice runs throughout this book from start to finish and it shows up in some astonishing statements, which I hope we´ll look at later.
WILKEN: We will. We´ll continue our two-hour roundtable with Pastor Tom Baker, Pastor Will Weedon, and Dr. Larry Rast right after this break. If you´d like to join the conversation, feel free to jump in. 505-7850 or 1-800-730-2727. Now, Rick Warren does not dwell a lot upon Baptism or the Lord´s Supper or the Sacraments in the book. But when we come back we will hear one of the statements that he makes about Baptism, and we´ll see how it figures into the premise that we´ve laid out here in our evaluation of the book, The Purpose Driven Life. If you´ve driven past a church lately where you saw "40 Days of Purpose," you´ve driven past a church where they´re reading The Purpose Driven Life. More on that when we come back.
[COMMERCIAL PAUSE]
WILKEN: Welcome back to Issues, Etc, well into our review of the best selling book, The Purpose Driven Life, by Rick Warren. Maybe you got a copy of this at home. Maybe your pastor has recommended or maybe even required that you read this thing. A lot of churches doing "40 Days of Purpose." Can you read this"”this is something we´ve gotta get to before our two-hour conservation is over"”can you read this and spit the bones? Can you read this and say, "Okay, there´s enough good in here that I can ignore the bad," or does it suffer from a fatal flaw?
Our guest, Dr. Larry Rast, associate professor of historical theology at Concordia Theological Seminary in Fort Wayne, Ind. Pastor Will Weedon joins us here in Studio A. He´s pastor of St. Paul Lutheran Church in Hamel, Ill. And then Pastor Tom Baker, director of development for the Concordia Mission Society and host of Law & Gospel heard here on AM 850 KFUO. Let´s see if we can tie up one loose string before we go onto Rick Warren on Baptism.
This notion that man has a free will, what does Scripture teach about the freedom"”or as Larry put it a few minutes ago"”the bondage of man´s will according to his fallen nature? Pastor Baker.
BAKER: In regard to temporal matters, we really do have free will. We can choose what car to buy, what wife to marry, what house to live in. But in regard to spiritual matters, we are dead in sin. That means that, unlike the book, we are no longer born in the image of God. This is a theme that you find in evangelicalism that there´s still that image of God and, of course, that allows the free will to make choices, etc. We´re actually born in the image of Satan now. And that´s why in infant Baptism, it´s taking the person"”it´s kind of taking them out of the kingdom of Satan into the kingdom of heaven. So that´s how I would respond to that question.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, you often hear the objection from someone who says, "But I remember October 27, 1972. I remember the day I made my decision for Christ!" What was really going on October 27, 1972?
WEEDON: The Holy Spirit is the giver of faith, and faith is not something we do. Or I should say, faith is not something that originates in us. Ephesians 2 is just a crucial passage in God´s Word for this whole discussion. As Pastor Baker already pointed out, you know, "you were dead in your trespasses and sins in which you once walked." And then later on in the chapter when he comes to the topic of faith, he says, "By grace you are saved through faith""”and he could not be clearer"”he says, "and this is not your own doing, it is not the result of works so that no one can boast. It´s a gift of God."
WILKEN: Let´s hear what Warren has to say on the subject of Baptism:
Now Baptism doesn´t make you a member of God´s family. Only faith in Christ does that. Baptism shows you are part of God´s family. Like a wedding ring, it´s a visible reminder of an inward commitment made in your heart.
WILKEN: Larry, evaluate Rick Warren´s statement there on Baptism.
RAST: Well, he"”it´s a typical kind of thing that you find in this book. Despite the fact that the first sentence of the book is that it´s "not about you""”quoting him"”in fact, what Baptism becomes is totally about you. That is, according to Warren, it is your public identification of an already existing faith"”something internal, something in the heart. As he goes on to say, or kind of the language he uses regarding it, is that Baptism symbolizes God´s purpose for your life. It declares your faith. It shares in Christ´s death and resurrection, symbolizes your death to your old life, announces your new life in Christ but, in fact, really doesn´t have any spiritual impact, any spiritual activity in the life of the sinner.
WILKEN: Is this what Scripture teaches about Baptism?
RAST: By no means! The Scripture is very clear. It says that it is by Baptism that the Holy Spirit works the gift of faith in us. "Baptism now saves you," says 1 Peter. Beyond that, "unless a man be born of water and the Spirit""”John 3"”"he cannot see the kingdom of God." And also Titus 3 where we hear about God "who has washed us clean" and really applied the justifying merits of Christ to us in the waters of Baptism. So Baptism is really God´s work, God´s action on our behalf! Not something that we do, but rather a gift"”a gift given freely by God.
WILKEN: Will, you mentioned at the outset that there were some glaring inconsistencies"”internal inconsistencies"”in Warren´s book. But on this subject of Baptism, is he at least being consistent with his own premise that man has a capacity to seek God?
WEEDON: Oh, yeah! This is what"”I mean, let us state it from the start"”he is a good Arminian. He is teaching exactly what Arminians teach, which is that we have to have this cooperation of the human will to achieve salvation and that the Sacraments"”well, I guess he probably wouldn´t even call them Sacraments; what do they call them, ordinances"”
RAST: Ordinances.
WEEDON: Yeah, ordinances"”ordinances to show our obedience. It´s not at all about what God does; it´s about what we do. And that´s how he pictures it with Baptism. I think Communion only gets a single passing mention.
WILKEN: Tom, your thoughts on Warren as he portrays Baptism as this outward symbol of something"”kind of the product of our will.
BAKER: Because of his Arminian background and his theology, he´s quite anti-sacramental in the sense that God is the One who objectively saves us, so I don´t have to look within myself. He supplants Baptism and the Lord´s Supper with prayer"”talks about a mantra, of breath-prayers throughout the day, and then we´re supposed to also make sure that we do this in order to honor God, not to control Him. We´re supposed to have the ability to keep our motives straight. In fact, he says "prayer is the most important tool for the mission in the church" and goes so far also to say that "your personal testimony""”page 290"”"is more effective than a sermon." Now get that. Personal testimony, namely, what Christ means to me is more important than a sermon based on God´s Word. And he goes so far to try and prove that"”and it´s almost comical here"”where he says on six different occasions, "Paul used his testimony to share the Gospel instead of quoting Scripture." Perhaps he forgot that Paul´s testimony was Scripture.
WILKEN: That´s a good point. Now, moving on from Baptism, obedience is a major feature of this book. You can hardly read this book without getting a very clear impression that Rick Warren is big on obedience. When he talks about sanctification, he talks about it as "friendship with God":
Second, to develop a friendship with God, I must choose to obey God in faith. Every time you trust God´s wisdom and do whatever He says to do"”even when you don´t understand it"”you deepen your friendship with God. We don´t normally think of obedience as a characteristic of friendship. That´s reserved for relationships with a parent or a boss or a superior officer, not a friend. However, Jesus made it clear that obedience is a condition of intimacy with God.
WILKEN: Will, you´re shaking your head. What are your thoughts on that when he talks about obedience as a condition as a friendship with God?
WEEDON: It reminds me of something of my own past. At one point I had"”when I was teenager"”drifted away from the Lutheran church and was listening to a bunch of charismatic nonsense, and I remember hearing a preacher once say, "The grounds of your salvation is grace. The condition of your salvation is obedience." And when I heard that, the Holy Spirit was reminding me that´s not true! That´s not what God´s Word says! "By grace you are saved through faith"! And that led me to realize right away that this group was something that I had to leave. It drove me back to the Lutheran church literally.
WILKEN: Tom, you mentioned before that you confess on a daily basis that you are a lost and condemned creature, a poor, miserable sinner. Warren says if you´re going to be a friend of God, it requires obedience. What kind of obedience is he calling for? Is it the perfect obedience required by the Law?
BAKER: Since it´s impossible to have perfect obedience in light of our old Adam"”I do have to say though, my old Adam really does like this book, because to develop friendship with God, I need to be obedient to Him, and I tried that on my wife. Went to Louise and said, "Look, you want to be my friend? Be obedient, cook when I tell you to, wash the clothes, etc." and for some reason a division occurred rather than"”
WEEDON: [LAUGHTER]
BAKER: "”rather than a unity. And I said, "You´re just not thinking right, woman!"
WILKEN: You didn´t win a friend that day.
BAKER: No, it really didn´t seem"”and, I tell ya, this is a God and this is a heaven where I would prefer to be on earth.
WILKEN: Larry, this is an old theme that must sound quite familiar to you, because you´ve made a career of studying the revivalism era of American Christianity. Tell us about that.
RAST: Yeah, in this respect Tom´s absolutely right that Warren does find himself in the line of a Bill Bright and back to Billy Graham, but this stretches well back before that to the revivalists in the 19th century and even before that. The greatest example of whom, of course, is Charles Finney who said that really what the Christian life is about is just that"”obedience"”and that salvation in the end is a conditional matter, conditioned upon the faithful response of the person who has the free will to choose God not only as Savior but to continue to choose God and to do the will of God in this life.
This is the word that undoes this book. Even though he says it´s not about you, well, in the end as soon as you say that obedience is a condition of intimacy with God, you´re distancing human beings from God! You´re putting up a great barrier between them because, as we´ve already heard and rightly so, there is no human being"”no naturally born human being"”who can keep the Law in its perfection. Only Christ has done that and He´s done it for us. But there´s the whole thing. Because of our lack of ability to do so, because of the fact that we, in fact, don´t want to do so and that we resist God and rebel against God, God insisted on breaking into our situation through the Incarnation of Jesus Christ and making that broken relationship right.
Whether I choose to obey God or not in this respect doesn´t change the fact that Jesus Christ came into this world and lived a perfect life, died, suffered and rose again so that the sins of the world are in fact forgiven. Now, Christ comes to me and the merits of His wonderful life are applied to me freely by God in Baptism, not as an obedient command that I fulfill but rather as a gracious act on God´s part on my behalf.
WILKEN: You know what I thought, guys? I thought when I read that section, obedience is a condition for intimacy with God, I said, "You know, he´s right, but it´s not my obedience."
WEEDON: Right.
WILKEN: Christ´s obedience is the condition for intimacy with God.
RAST: Exactly.
WILKEN: Christ´s obedience is what has purchased and won for me a relationship with God where I need not fear, where I have peace with God. Tom?
BAKER: Yeah, I think that´s an important point that, why does he think that Jesus Christ is important? Here´s the difference, I think, between his theology and Reformation theology. For him Jesus Christ is absolutely important because he provides the potential for my able to cooperate in order that I might, by my obedience, please Him. Whereas in Lutheran theology, Jesus doesn´t just provide the potential for my salvation, He actually provides my salvation. Therefore my works are never a cause of my getting right with God, they are always a result of Him getting me right with Him.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, is there any getting around this when you read The Purpose Driven Life? Is there any getting around the fact that essentially what he´s saying is, your works cause a bettered relationship with God?
WEEDON: No, everything is integral to the whole message. And the picture he gives of the Christian is inherently flawed because he does not picture the Christian as same time, as we say, saint and sinner. He does not deal with the fact that there is an old Adam who corrupts every work that we do so that even the good works that we do need to be forgiven because of the rotten motives sometimes for which we do them! They´re always going to be flawed! As Isaiah said, you know, it´s our "righteousnesses that are as a filthy rag" in God´s sight, not the sins"”the good things we do that need forgiveness too.
WILKEN: Pastor Will Weedon is our guest here in Studio A, along with Pastor Tom Baker. Dr. Larry Rast joins us on the phone. This is our two-hour roundtable discussion of The Purpose Driven Life by Rick Warren. Another major theme"”and you mention this earlier, Will"”in the book, The Purpose Driven Life, is that of choices:
Christ´s likeness is not produced by imitation but by inhabitation. We allow Christ to live through us. The Bible says, "For this is the secret, Christ lives in you." How does this happen in real life? Through the choices we make. We choose to do the right thing in situations and then trust God´s Spirit to give us His power and His love and His faith and wisdom to do it. Since God´s Spirit lives inside of us, these things are always available for the asking.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, your response.
WEEDON: You know, when I first started reading that paragraph I was almost getting excited. I thought, "Well, he might be onto something here! He might be getting it right! Christ´s likeness is not produced by imitation." And I wanted to say, "Amen! No way!" I kept on thinking about John 15, the branches and the vine. I kept on thinking about Jesus saying, "Apart from Me you can do nothing"! And I thought, "Surely now, surely this will be the place where he talks about how God through the Word and Sacraments inhabits us." And instead we are told that God inhabits us through the choices we make. I cannot express my horror at such a statement.
WILKEN: Why is that?
WEEDON: This takes guts, this Christianity, because our faith is not about the choices we make. It´s about the Divine life which is in Jesus Christ, which He´s"”you know, He suffered and died and rose again to impart that life to us so that we may have koinonia"”fellowship with God through Him. He wants that Life to be in us. And He extends that Life to us through the Word and Sacraments. And to say that that Life comes to us through our doings? This is worse than anything Rome ever came up with.
WILKEN: Tom, if salvation begins with my choice, it only makes sense that the indwelling of Christ"”the ongoing indwelling of Christ"”would occur also through my choices, right?
BAKER: If salvation begins with your choice.
WILKEN: Yes.
BAKER: Which the Bible contradicts, right?
WILKEN: Right!
BAKER: [LAUGHTER]
WILKEN: So if salvation doesn´t begin with my choice but of God´s choice of me"”
BAKER: Yes.
WILKEN: "”is there any way that someone who follows in the stream of the Reformation, "salvation by grace through faith for the sake of Christ alone," can say that Christ indwells us through the choices we make?
BAKER: No, not at all. What´s happening with Rick Warren as a theologian of glory, he is simply interpreting Bible from his experience. He probably grew up in a household where his parents appreciated him more by how he acted, where his teachers gave him A´s when he did well on tests, and where his job"”employers"”gave him promotions when he did well, and he thinks that´s the way God is also. He is just applying the way things work in the temporal realm to the spiritual realm and, unfortunately, is falling back into pre-Reformation theology.
WILKEN: Larry, your thoughts on the choices we make.
RAST: Well, it seems that what Warren tends to do is reduce faith to choice, that is, almost to make the two synonymous so that the choices you make then become either the faith that you have or you don´t have"”faith as the action or the deed that´s actually done, rather than how the Scriptures so clearly teach faith as that which receives the gifts of God, that which clings to Christ and Him alone.
In every case the author of this book retreats to the conditions that are left in front of us that we have to fulfill, the potential that we have to fulfill them, and then leaves us with the word of the Law that says "now do this!" whether it´s in Baptism, whether it´s faith, whether it´s free will, whatever it may be. We´re always left with the statement, "Now do this; it´s up to you."
WILKEN: Larry, is this what we talked about"”is this a good example of what we talked about Sunday night on the program"”the similarities between Roman Catholicism and where Rick Warren stands, that is, in the heart of American Evangelicalism?
RAST: Yes, that´s an excellent point you make there, Todd, because here you see one of the most amazing things of church history in that, those who claim to be apart of the Reformation to have grown out of it have, in fact, walked a path if not back to Rome in terms of their allegiances and their alliances, at least theologically they´ve beat a path towards that door. And in some cases have even gone beyond what Rome teaches. But you say, "How can that be?" Well, I think in the end it´s simply a matter of the human nature playing itself out as it must if it´s not well informed by the Word of God. Namely, that we human beings work from the posture of the Law, and we believe that if we are to be right with God, if we are to be in the fullest possible relationship with Him, then there is something that we have to do. Whether it be a little or whether it be a lot, there´s something that´s left up to the human being. And what Scripture makes clear over and over again is that it is God who makes things right between Himself and human beings"”not the human being who does that.
WILKEN: So, I guess what I´m wondering is, someone is reading this book and they´re loving every minute of it. Why does it appeal, Pastor Weedon? Is it precisely for the reasons that Larry just stated?
WEEDON: Yeah.
WILKEN: It speaks to the old Adam"”
WEEDON: Yeah, it strokes the old Adam. It sure does. It feels so good to accomplish something. And this is what, you know, he´s going to give you 40 steps to groom that old Adam every day. Can I add one thing on that before we go on?
WILKEN: Sure!
WEEDON: It strikes me as characteristic of the whole book. Instead of killing the old Adam, he is out to reform him.
WILKEN: Clean him up.
WEEDON: Clean him up! I keep on thinking of that terrible phrase in the Anglican liturgy where in the confession of sins they confess that we are "very far gone from original righteousness." You know, we were very far gone but, you know, we´re not totally lost, we´re just very far gone and we just need to get our act together, and he has a book to help us get our act together.
WILKEN: Tom, you have served as a parish pastor in a previous incarnation for a long time.
BAKER: Yes.
WILKEN: I think 25 years we celebrated with you last year, is that correct?
BAKER: Yes.
WILKEN: So you´ve had a lot of time with the people of God as a pastor in the church. Having read The Purpose Driven Life, what do you think would be the result of one of your parishioners reading this book, taking it deeply to heart? Where would they actually be at the end of 40 days?
BAKER: I had two kinds of parishioners: those who are somewhat pharisaical because there´s not really any problems in their life, and so they thank God they´re not like other people and they would love this book. And then I had another kind who are really depressed. They´re unable to follow God´s will. They don´t think God loves them. They don´t think they´re appropriate for the church. And here´s the kinds of things that Rick Warren would want me to say to them if they walked into my office. This depressed person"”page 80: "You can´t call Jesus your Lord when you refuse to obey Him." Page 95: "Jesus made it clear that obedience is a condition of intimacy with God." 175: "God waits for you to act first." And 180: "Every choice has eternal consequences, so you had better choose wisely."
WILKEN: So where would that parishioner who believes that God hates them and realizes their own sin, where would that person end up after "40 Days of Purpose"?
BAKER: It depends on how they read it. If they read it with pharisaical eyes thinking that they can achieve these things, they´re gonna feel real good about themselves. And the first thing that will happen, there will be a division within any community that attempts to do this, between those who´ve "We´ve made it!" verses those who say "I don´t think I even want to be part of this!" because in their heart of hearts they know that this is not godly.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, you serve as a parish pastor right now. This is "40 Days of Purpose" that´s being recommended to the church. The church has been doing its own 40 days for an awful long time"”
WEEDON: Amen! Amen!
WILKEN: What´s the difference? What´s the difference between "40 Days of Purpose" and the 40 days that the church has called Lent?
WEEDON: You know, I was struck as I read this book about how it doesn´t seem to fit very well with Paul´s statement in 1 Corinthians 2: "I was determined to know nothing among you but Jesus Christ and Him crucified." Those are 40 days"”the season of Lent"”when the church invites her people to know nothing but Jesus Christ and Him crucified, to be transformed the Bible way, not by, you know, pulling yourself up with your own bootstraps"”even with the help of the Holy Spirit"”but to gaze upon the Crucified and to hear the message that this is what your God has done to save you. You are His. You belong to Him. He has answered for every one of your sins. And you will share an eternity of joy with Him as you believe this.
WILKEN: Well, folks, I tell you what, I have a lot of questions that remain. That´s why it´s good we´ve got still an hour left for our roundtable, evaluating and reviewing the best selling book, The Purpose Driven Life, by Rick Warren. When we come back, Rick Warren on worship, on mission, on the unity of the church, on the end times, and we´ll revisit the subject that lies as the foundation of The Purpose Driven Life, and that is this notion of eternal rewards. Now, we haven´t been taking your phone calls during this hour due to the fact that we have an awful lot of material to cover, and we have to cover it thoroughly in order to do justice to the book. We will be taking your phone calls right after this break. 1-800-730-2727 or 505-7850. We also have an in-studio e-mail address. If you´re getting a busy signal, please keep trying. Or just e-mail us and we´ll pick it up here. [email protected].
Here´s one of the biggest questions that remains for me. Picking up on what Pastor Weedon had to say about knowing Christ and Him crucified, what´s going to happen in those congregations who are now taking up the call for "40 Days of Purpose" if they take it to heart and do it as Rick Warren prescribes and they go 40 days without Jesus Christ and Him crucified? 40 days of you!"”40 days of your purpose, your obedience, your choices, of your ability to please God, your ability to prepare for that test that´s coming, that final audit, that final evaluation, wherein will hang in the balance whether or not you spend eternity in coach or in first class. What´s going to be the end result for a congregation that has to go 40 days without Christ and Him crucified? When we come back, Warren on worship.
[Commercial Pause]
WILKEN: I fear that having even allowed two hours for this roundtable discussion of The Purpose Driven Life by Rick Warren, we might still have bitten off more than we can chew. Maybe we should´ve planned a 40-hour review of the book. It might take that much time to examine not only its premise but also the errors therein. And I have promised to take your phone calls, so we will be taking a couple of phone calls here right at the outset of hour two of this two-hour discussion of The Purpose Driven Life.
Dr. Larry Rast is our guest, associate professor of historical theology at Concordia Theological Seminary in Fort Wayne, Ind. Pastor Will Weedon and Pastor Tom Baker join us here in Studio A to round off the roundtable. Pastor Will Weedon is pastor of St. Paul Lutheran Church in Hamel, Ill., and Pastor Tom Baker is director of development for the Concordia Mission Society and host of Law & Gospel heard here on AM 850 KFUO. Our call-in numbers are 505-7850 or 1-800-730-2727. You will be getting a busy signal, but we´ll be freeing up some phone lines here right now. We´ll start talking with Al who´s calling from his car. Al, welcome to Issues, Etc.
AL: Evening, gentlemen.
WILKEN: Evening.
AL: Just stepped in the middle of this. I just turned my radio on so I haven´t heard too much. But it sounds like what we´re dealing with is a study that"”and I´ve been involved in studies like these before to where they really give a false image of what they´re about. It´s like they put forward that it´s gonna be all Gospel and all good news and such, but in reality they may start you out with a little bit of Gospel, but they throw you right back under the Law or they leave you under the Law. And it´s like you´re left to your own resources then of what to do.
WILKEN: Go ahead, Al. Thank you for the call. Pastor Weedon, is Al´s assessment pretty accurate?
WEEDON: I think it´s a very accurate assessment. What is promised in the book is not delivered by the end of the book.
WILKEN: What does he promise?
WEEDON: I think what he promises you is a life that will be filled with the peace, the joy, the love of God"”which he says very clear is not in contradiction to the"”I mean, he gives us those things also in the midst of earthly sufferings and difficulties"”but the way in which he would invite that into your life is by your obedience. And by your obedience you will not achieve any of that. Those things flow to you as gifts of God to you in the Word and in the Sacraments.
WILKEN: Tom, the book starts out with its thesis, it´s not about you, it´s about God, it´s about Jesus. Is that your experience as you have read the book? Is this book about me or is it about Jesus?
BAKER: There´s two people in the world that think different ways: those who are living under the Law, living under the Gospel. Those who live under the Law really think that what they do really"”their contribution is gonna make a difference in how God regards them, in contrast to those who live under the Gospel. What he offers here"”for example, he offers pie-in-the-sky things that simply don´t happen. For example, "the more you meditate on God´s Word, the less you will have to worry about""”verse 90"”uh, page 90"”I got in verses. "The next 40 days will transform your life""”page 10. Well, yes, so does Mormon theology and Jehovah Witness theology and other such theologies. What he offers is not fulfilled.
WILKEN: Let´s go back to the phones. Kurt is calling from his car. Kurt, welcome to Issues, Etc.
KURT: Hi. My question is, if Rick Warren had submitted this manuscript to CPH, how would"”what would the editors have said? Or how could they have edited the book to make it better? And I guess, would it had been sufficient at the end of every chapter to say, "Okay, we´ve been talking about Law here. I´ve been encouraging you to obey God and to do good things. But keep in mind that your good works are filthy rags." Would that have been sufficient to correct this book?
WILKEN: That´s an excellent question, Kurt. He´s talking about Concordia Publishing House, the publishing house of The Lutheran Church"”Missouri Synod. Tom, could they have fixed the book by putting in the caveat at the end of each chapter?
BAKER: No, because it would totally contradict the many places of the book. I´ll give you one example. "You can actually make God smile by five acts of worship," he says. "God smiles when we love Him supremely, when we trust Him completely, when we obey Him whole-heartedly, and when we praise and thank Him continually." Well, I looked in the mirror today and I found out I don´t do any of those. I do not love Him supremely or trust Him completely or obey Him whole-heartedly or praise and thank Him continually to the point that I say on Sunday morning, "I´m a poor, miserable sinner deserving nothing but temporal and eternal punishment." So if we put that caveat at the end of every chapter, we are then saying therefore, "Well, okay. If these are the five acts of worship that make God smile," guess what? God never smiles at you. Now who would buy such a book?
WILKEN: Mark is calling from Creve Coeur. Mark, welcome to Issues, Etc.
MARK: Hello. I do have a question for your panel members. My question is this: if a person came to one of the members of your panel and said, "The Holy Spirit´s been at work in my life, and I´d like to become a Christian. How do I become a Christian?" What would you say? And I´d also like their comments on the fact that many of the largest Missouri Synod Lutheran churches in St. Louis right now are using the "40 Days of Purpose," like, St. John´s Lutheran in Ellisville, and"”
WILKEN: Oh, I guess we lost him there. Larry, in answer to the question if someone came to you"”you´re a panel member here"”and said, "How do I become a Christian?" What´s your response?
RAST: Yeah, well, the premise was that the Holy Spirit has been working on my heart, this person says. And I´d be interested to know what that person means by that. Do they mean they become aware of their sin, that they´ve read the Scriptures and that they know that they are a poor, miserable sinner, one who cannot in any way, shape or form merit God´s favor or claim to be a person who is worthy of being saved? If they´re saying that´s how the Holy Spirit´s been working on their heart, then I´d say great! You know, but how do I become a Christian? You know, that´s really in a lot of ways the wrong way to put it, although you would expect that of human beings when they find themselves in that position. Think back to Acts 2 where you have Peter preach the Word and these folks say, "What must we do to be saved?" and he comes right back around and said, "There´s nothing you can do"”that is, repent!" There´s nothing at all you can do in yourself. And then he goes on and says, "Be baptized." That is, that´s the place where God makes you His own. This is God´s action on your behalf. So once again we see the clear kind of teaching of Scripture in this regard, that it is nothing in us that brings this about, but it´s all about God´s working on our behalf.
WILKEN: Pastor Weedon, the caller mentioned large Lutheran churches using this book and undergoing "40 Days of Purpose." Your thoughts about that.
WEEDON: My thought is how I don´t know how any Lutheran pastor with any integrity can recommend this book to his people. I just do not understand, unless you´re going to be going through the book and showing them all of the errors that are laced throughout it, that you can hand it to people and say, "˜it´s a good resource, use." You know what it reminded"”the idea that Lutherans could possibly use a book like this with Lutheran presuppositions"”it reminded me of discussions from a long time ago there, Tom, where people would say, "Well, we can use the historical-critical method of Bible study. We´ll just use it with Lutheran presuppositions!" And of course the fact was, it was an impossibility, because the presuppositions of historical-criticism are contrary to the presuppositions of biblical Lutheranism in the same way the presuppositions of the Arminianism that runs through this book are flat-out contradicted by our Lutheran confessions! There is no common ground here.
WILKEN: Tom, how would you have used this book in your former parish?
BAKER: I would have used it the same way I used it when one of my field workers alerted me to Charles Finney. I don´t know where I was in the seminary, but I don´t think the seminary taught me much about Charles Finney. But he has now, in my mind, I understand him to be one of the most influential theologians. And I´ve looked at his book on systematics and done a comparison between his theology and C.F.W. Walther´s on The [Proper] Distinction Between Law & Gospel. I would use a book like this in my parish to help alert people to be, "Here´s the kinds of things you´re hearing on evangelical radio, hearing in evangelical sermons, and these are the things we want to warn you against." I think our people need to know about these things so"”because they are so well stated and at times they sound so good, it´s kinda like a good advertisement that if you really buy that Corvette, you´re gonna get the blonde. And people buy Corvettes"”
WEEDON: [LAUGHTER]
BAKER: "”and don´t get the blonde and they wonder what happened! And some other points. The other thing I would use this for, I tell you I have to say this! I have a whole page of insights that Rick Warren has that I think are very good. You know me on Law & Gospel, I like the Law as a hammer, and he gave me an idea of how God sometimes if a hammer isn´t good enough, He uses a sledgehammer, and if that´s not good enough, He uses a jackhammer. He has, as you mentioned before, Pastor Weedon, some way with words that I would definitely incorporate into my sermons in different ways. But it wouldn´t be a book that I would just give to the laity without a lot of information as to, you know, this is the kind of theology in a nice summary of what we don´t believe.
WILKEN: We´re undertaking a critical evaluation of the best selling book, The Purpose Driven Life, by Rick Warren. Dr. Larry Rast joins us by telephone from Fort Wayne where he serves as associate professor of historical theology. Pastor Will Weedon joins us here in Studio A. He´s pastor of St. Paul Lutheran Church in Hamel, Ill. And Pastor Tom Baker, you just heard him, host of Law & Gospel here on AM 850 KFUO and director of development for the Concordia Mission Society, also here in Studio A. Back to the phones. Troy is calling from Collinsville. Troy, welcome to Issues, Etc.
TROY: Hi, Todd.
WILKEN: Hi.
TROY: Hey, I listen to your program quite a bit, but I have to admit to you that I´m a big Law & Gospel fan.
WILKEN: That´s great!
TROY: Simply because of what time I get off at work, and Tom´s usually on. I do get to listen to you occasionally.
BAKER: Oh, so it´s a time thing, not a content. Hey, thanks a lot!
TROY: Hey you know, guys, this issue that you´re talking about needs to be talked about. I´m 41-years old and I grew up in a Pentecostal background in Cleveland, Tenn., with a Church of God branch down there. And they´ve got churches everywhere. And
 
Whew! what a lengthy post!

Anyway to summarize the content a bit?

I think I see a couple of themes:

1. RW proposes works redemption

2. RW is a papist

Are there more?

RW - "Now what I love to do is to teach theology to non-believers without ever telling them it is theology and without ever using theology terms. For instance, I once did an eight-week series on sanctification and never used the term. I did a four-week series on the incarnation and never used the term. I did a twelve-week series on the attributes of God "” the omniscience, omnipresence, omnipotence "” and never used the terms. I just called it "Getting to Know God." I love to teach theology to non-believers without them knowing what it is; I find that a challenge. So it´s a good balance."
 
Originally posted by jdlongmire
Whew! what a lengthy post!

Anyway to summarize the content a bit?

I think I see a couple of themes:

1. RW proposes works redemption

2. RW is a papist

Are there more?

RW - "Now what I love to do is to teach theology to non-believers without ever telling them it is theology and without ever using theology terms. For instance, I once did an eight-week series on sanctification and never used the term. I did a four-week series on the incarnation and never used the term. I did a twelve-week series on the attributes of God "” the omniscience, omnipresence, omnipotence "” and never used the terms. I just called it "Getting to Know God." I love to teach theology to non-believers without them knowing what it is; I find that a challenge. So it´s a good balance."

Hi JD...

Other traits RW bears is gnostic/mystic. He regularly claims things like: "God told me to tell you...." and/or speaks "for" God....which, among other things, is the sin of presumption.

Obviously, this is a huge problem since the claim cannot be made accountable, putting RW's proclamation on a par with Holy Scripture (though, I'd doubt RW would agree it was.) The point is, RW claims one thing then turns right around and does the opposite. I think Scripture refers to this as "double-minded." It is also common knowledge that anyone questioning his claims or PDL is put-down, vilified; shunned. The PDC seminars teach how to "deal" with dissenters. (Not all dissenters are "jealous" of his success....some are genuinely discerning problems.)

:2cents:

r.
 
Whew! what a lengthy post!

LOL, I thought so to after I posted it. But like a dunderhead I lost the link but still had the text. It was so good in spelling it out that I thought it worth posting. Tough to read that much on cpu, I do it all day at my job and it gives me a headache if I can't get a hard copy!

L
 
Originally posted by jdlongmire
Whew! what a lengthy post!

Anyway to summarize the content a bit?

I think I see a couple of themes:

1. RW proposes works redemption

2. RW is a papist

Are there more?

RW - "Now what I love to do is to teach theology to non-believers without ever telling them it is theology and without ever using theology terms. For instance, I once did an eight-week series on sanctification and never used the term. I did a four-week series on the incarnation and never used the term. I did a twelve-week series on the attributes of God "” the omniscience, omnipresence, omnipotence "” and never used the terms. I just called it "Getting to Know God." I love to teach theology to non-believers without them knowing what it is; I find that a challenge. So it´s a good balance."
Aw shucks JD. Nobody can summarize a long dialogue about the dangers of R.W.'s approach by three learned men like you can. So I'm supposed to get as much out of your pithy quote from Rick Warren as I am from the dialogue that you crassly summarize with utter disdain for their concerns?

You make it increasingly clear that there is little reason to dialogue with you. You accuse us of a lack of charity when many of us have seen the fruits of PDL firsthand in many Churches and then you provide an unwarranted caricature of other's reasonable criticisms. Physician, heal thyself.

[Edited on 12-13-2005 by SemperFideles]
 
Ow, brother - I am genuinely hurt...

I actually was just trying to get a few simple discussion topics out of a HUGE post that was very disdainful and one-sided.

The RW quote was simply to highlight what I consider the PDL does - present theologic and doctrinal principles distilled into lay language.

Again - sorry if I offended.

I think I'll go back and debate Atheists - at least when they insult me I understand from where it originates.

- pax vobiscum -

[Edited on 12-13-2005 by jdlongmire]
 
Originally posted by jdlongmire
Ow, brother - I am genuinely hurt...

I actually was just trying to get a few simple discussion topics out of a HUGE post that was very disdainful and one-sided.

The RW quote was simply to highlight what I consider the PDL does - present theologic and doctrinal principles distilled into lay language.

Again - sorry if I offended.

I think I'll go back and debate Atheists - at least when they insult me I understand from where it originates.

- pax vobiscum -
I need no apology. It's two Lutheran Pastors and a Professor of Theology that Larry cited that you should contact. It is their writing that you misrepresent very uncharitably.

If you cannot understand how you have and your only choice is to interact with Atheists then that is unfortunate as well.
 
no - my choice is to interact with those who may be Elect and present the Gospel in a winsome way, so that they respond to the call or have the seeds of the Gospel planted.

Again, your view of my intent is most uncharitable. These gentlemen - learned as they may be - invited no counterpoint and mocked a brother very uncharitably themselves.

The length of the post made detailed rebuttal very problematic - I highlighted a couple of points to invite additional discussion - and perhaps be corrected in my observations - yet you post and cut me with your cynical, mocking, judgemental and caustic comment - not in a loving manner at all...much in the manner of my opponents on the atheist board.

Examine yourself, brother.

[Edited on 12-13-2005 by jdlongmire]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top