Tabular comparison of WCF and 1689 LBCF

[raekwon]

If anyone's interested, that is. I've found this page quite profitable in my study.

http://www.proginosko.com/docs/wcf_lbcf.html

 

[wsw201]

Good site. Very helpful.

 

[VirginiaHuguenot]

I recently posted the link to that site in this thread, where I have also posted a comparison of the 1646 and 1789 WCF.

A Tabular Comparison of the 1646 WCF and the 1689 LBCF

Differences Between the 1646 and 1789 WCF

 

[S. Spence]

Very Helpful!

 

[raekwon]

I recently posted the link to that site in this thread, where I have also posted a comparison of the 1646 and 1789 WCF.

Looks like the link to the comparisons between the two WCFs is dead. Accursed linkrot!

No worries, though. It's apparently still available on the Wayback Machine . . .
http://web.archive.org/web/20050204111905/http://www.opc.org/documents/WCF_orig.html

 

[VirginiaHuguenot]

Looks like the link to the comparisons between the two WCFs is dead. Accursed linkrot!

No worries, though. It's apparently still available on the Wayback Machine . . .
http://web.archive.org/web/20050204111905/http://www.opc.org/documents/WCF_orig.html

Thanks!